Examining Learner-Centered Modes of Assessment: Perspectives from the 2014 South Sudan National Curriculum Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajep.2977Keywords:
Formative Assessment; Summative Assessment; Learner-Centered Assessment; Teacher CompetenceAbstract
Purpose: To explore learner-centered modes of assessment employed in 15 randomly selected public and private secondary schools within Juba City following the implementation of the competency-based curriculum.
Methodology: The study employed a mixed methods convergent parallel design. A total of 225 teachers were randomly selected to respond to a self-administered questionnaire. Interviews were conducted with 16 teachers, 13 head teachers, and three officials from the National Examination Council (NEC) in the Ministry of General Education and Instruction (MoGEI), while focus group discussions involved 42 science and humanities teachers. Participants for the interviews and focus group discussions were purposively selected. The questionnaire attained a Content Validity Index (CVI) of 0.88, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.916 for test-retest reliability, and a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.75 for internal consistency.
Findings: Teachers employed various learner-centered modes of assessment, primarily through formative assessment conducted continuously using oral questioning, class exercises, assignments/homework, and presentations to evaluate learners’ understanding of the topics taught. Summative assessment was administered through examinations, with final evaluations incorporating scores from both formative and summative assessments. However, traditional and individualistic assessment methods continued to dominate, with minimal application of authentic, process-oriented assessments. The findings further revealed that only a limited number of teachers had received training in learner-centered modes of assessment.
Recommendations: The study recommended the application of the full range of formative assessment approaches, including the use of portfolios, as well as continuous professional development for teachers on learner-centered modes of assessment.
Downloads
References
Akpan, V. I., Igwe, U., Mpamah, I., & Okoro, C. (2020). Social constructivism: implications on teaching and learning. British Journal of Education, 8(8), 49-56. https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/Social-Constructivism.pdf
Baran, M. L., & Jones, J. E. (2019). Applied social science approaches to mixed methods research. IGI Global. https://books.google.com › Reference › Research
Birgin, O., & Baki, A. (2007). The Use of Portfolio to Assess Student's Performance. Online Submission, 4(2), 75-90. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED504219
Brookhart, S. M. (2023). Classroom assessment essentials. ASCD.
Chand, S., & Pillay, K. (2024). Understanding the fundamental differences between formative and summative assessment. Global Scientific and Academic Research Journal of Education and Literature, 2(2), 6-9. https://gsarpublishers.com/gsarjel-home-page/Understanding [accessed Jan 19 2026].
Cullen, R., Harris, M., & Hill, R. R. (2012). The learner-centered curriculum: Design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. https://scholar.google.com/scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning. John Wiley & Sons. https://scholar.google.com/schola
Denscombe, M. (2017). EBOOK: The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). https://scholar.google.com/scholar
Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2013). Action research in education. https://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir ›
Fah, L. Y., & Hoon, K. C. (2021). Quantitative Approaches in Educational Research. Universiti Malaysia Sabah Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar
Francis, O. R. (2008). Early childhood education curriculum and programs. In L. G. Thomas (Ed.), 21st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 388 – 394). SAGE. https://scholar.google.com/scholar
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson Higher Ed. https://yuli-elearning.com/pluginfile.php/4831/mod_resource/content/
Gingell, J., & Winch, C. (2008). Philosophy of education: The key concepts. Routledge. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781134109661_A25025848/preview-9781134109661_A25025848.pdf
Guest, G., & Fleming, P. (2015). Mixed methods research. Public health research methods, 5, 581-614. https://doi.org/DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398839.n19
Hemmati, M. R., & Aziz Malayeri, F. (2022). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of obstacles to implementing student-centered learning: a mixed-methods study. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 10(40), 133-152. http//: http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/journal/
Holcomb, Z. (2016). Fundamentals of descriptive statistics. Routledge. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781351970334_A27750925/preview-9781351970334_A27750925.pdf
Islam, S., Dilshad, M., & Ali, W. (2024). Analysis of Problems and Challenges of Secondary Schools Head Teachers of Conducting Punjab Examination Commission Exams in Pakistan. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 10-21. https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-8.3.2
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches ,(Çev. Ed. SB Demir). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264274753_Educational_Research_Quantitative_Qualitative_and_Mixed_Approaches_Fifth_Edition
Kabombwe, Y., Machila, N., & Sikayomya, P. (2021). A comparative analysis of the Zambian senior secondary history examination between the old and revised curriculum using blooms taxonomy. Yesterday and Today(25), 1-25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17159/2223-0386/2021/n25a2
Kitta, S., & Tilya, F. (2010). The status of learner-centred learning and assessment in Tanzania in the context of the competence-based curriculum. Papers in Education and Development(29), 77-91. https://journals.udsm.ac.tz/index.php/ped/article/view/1449
Lafferty, K., & Barnes, M. (2024). Competency-based Assessment: Evidence-based Insights and Strategies for Educators. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.ug/books
Lincoln, & Guba. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). sage. https://scholar.google.com/scholar
Maba, W. (2017). Teacher's Perception on the Implementation of the Assessment Process in 2013 Curriculum. International journal of social sciences and humanities, 1(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/ DOI: 10.29332/ijssh.v1n2.26
Marcus, A. C., & Joseph, E. A. (2014). Science teachers’ and continuous assessment implementation in secondary schools: Competence and effects. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 4(4), 36-41. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/
Mdessa, F., & Nyoni, K. Z. (2022). Challenges of Learner-centred Assessment in Teaching and Learning Geography in Secondary Schools in Kilolo District, Tanzania. Chief Editor, 71. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chipanda-Simon/publication/363090778
MoEST. (2015). South Sudan Education Statistics for Central Equatoria. Data and Statistics unit. https://mogei.gov.ss › assets › SSEMIS_2015_CEQ
MOGEI. (2017). The General Education
Strategic Plan, 2017-2022. Juba South Sudan: Ministry of General Education and Instruction Retrieved from https://mogei.gov.ss
Mogga, J. L. E. (2017). Teacher Education in South Sudan: Mapping the Ideological and Theoretical
Vacuum. https://www.saudijournals.com/media/articles/JAEP-22-66-79-c.pdf
Mokhtaria, L. (2015). The use of portfolio as an assessment tool. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(7), 170-172. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/72291336/
Mpanza, C. K., & Banja, M. K. (2025). An Analysis of Classroom Assessment Strategies Utilized by Secondary School Teachers: A Case of Selected Schools in Kabwe District, Zambia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(4), 1190-1205. https://doi.org/DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90400092
Muhammad, I. M. S., Tomalá, M. P. C., Coello, C. R. M., Silva, S. A. C., & Silva, C. d. R. C. (2024). Assessment methods and their impact on learning outcomes in education: Los métodos de evaluación y su impacto en los resultados del aprendizaje en la educación. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 5(5), 3336–3350-3336–3350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i5.2865
Nazeef, N. M., & Fareed, N. (2024). Teachers Perspective towards Assessment Techniques: Balancing Formative and Summative Approaches at Secondary Level. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 5(3), 411-426. https://doi.org/: https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2024(5-III)37
O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers. http://www.acousticslab.org/dots_sample/module4/OneillMcMahon2005.pdf
Salema, V. (2017). Assessment practices in secondary schools in Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania; a gap between theory and practice. European Journal of Education Studies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.248668
Shah, D., & Kumar, R. (2020a). Learner centered teaching: Barriers in developing countries. International Journal of All Research and Scientific Methods (IJARESM), 8(2), 11-22. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rajendra-Shah-Ph-D/publication/357429035
Shah, D., & Kumar, R. (2020b). Secondary School Teachers and Students Perceptions and Practices towards Learner-Centered Education. 8(3), 19-29. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/77802524/012_IJARESM
Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J. A., & Chappuis, J. (2004). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right, using it well. Assessment Training Institute.
Terrell, S. R. (2012). Mixed-methods research methodologies. Qualitative report, 17(1), 254-280. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2(17-37), 25. https://books.google.co.ug/books
Toma, J. D. (2011). Approaching rigor in applied qualitative. The SAGE handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry, 263-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483351377.n17
Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). So each may soar: The principles and practices of learner-centered classrooms. ASCD. https://books.google.co.ug/books
Topping, K. (2021). Peer Assessment: Channels of Operation. Educ. Sci. 2021, 11, 91. Cooperative/Collaborative Learning, 103. https://doi.org/;
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030091
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press. https://books.google.co.ug/books?hl
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rose Hezekiah Jonathan Kilonga, Dr Imelda Kemeza, Dr Alice Mwesgwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
