Phonemic Awareness as a Determinant of Reading Abilities of Children with Reading Disabilities in the Buea Municipality, South West Region of Cameroon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajp.1082Keywords:
Phonemic awareness, reading ability, children with reading disabilitiesAbstract
Purpose: This study was aimed at examining phonemic awareness as a determinant of reading abilities of children with reading disabilities in the Buea Municipality, South West Region of Cameroon
Methodology: This Study Was Based on the Premise That Phonemic Awareness Has Been Identified As The best early indicator of a learner’s reading potentials because it sets the stage for phonics, and literacy. A quasi-experimental design was adopted for the study with 14 participants, 7 in the experimental group and 7 in the control group. A pre-test and post-test were administered to the children before and after the intervention. The instrument used for data collection was a phonemic awareness test that constituted elements of reading, sound identification, deletion of the first phoneme, deletion of the second phoneme, initial phoneme identification and final phoneme identification. Data was analyzed using EpiData Version 3.1 Cohen’s d test and Cramer’s V test.
Findings: Results indicated that the phonemic awareness has a significant effect on the reading abilities of children with reading disabilities, this was based on the mean difference of the pre-test (11.37) and post-test (15.17) giving a mean difference of 3.8 with a paired sample t-test of 2.844 giving a significant value of P= 0.05. The study concluded that effective instructions through the development of a child’s ability to understand how individual phonemes can be manipulated and arranged to create words can stop and repair the learning gap and can impart the skills an older reader missed in the earlier grades.
Recommendation: Based on the findings, it was recommended that teachers should be more inclusive in their handling of students’ .Also, parents should be encourage to help children back at home to develop reading skills.
Downloads
References
Andzayi, C. A. &Ikwen, E. U. (2014).Developing beginning reading skills among primary school pupils in cross river state Nigeria: a pilot study report.Journal of modern education reviews. 4(6) 427-438.
Ball, E. & Blachman, B. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word? Reading Research Quaterly, 49-66.
Bowers, P.G., Sunseth, K. & Golden, J. (1999). The route between rapid naming and reading progress. Scientific Studies in Reading, 3, 1, 31–54.
Chan, L.K.S. & Dally, K. (2000). Review of literature. In W. Louden, L.K.S. Chan, J. Elkins, D. Greaves, H. House, M. Milton and others (2000). Mapping the territory: Primary students with learning difficulties in literacy and numeracy, V.2, pp.161–331.
Carrell, P. & Devine, J. E. (2000). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coltheart, M., K. Rastle, C. Perry, R. Langdon & J. Ziegler (2001). DRC, Dual Route cascaded Model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108,204-56.
Considine, D., Horton, J. & Moorman, G. (2009). Teaching and reaching the millennial generation through media literacy. Journal of adolescent and adult literacy, 52(6), 471-481..
Davis M. J., (2000).Reading and literacy in New Mexico State, Demarest: High Desert Education
Ehri, L. (2004). Teaching phonemic awareness and phonics. In P. McCardle& V. Chhabra (Eds.).The voice of evidence in reading research, 153–186.
Fletcher J, Reid, L. G, Fuchs L, Barnes M. (2007). Learning Disabilities: From Identification to Intervention. Guildford Press; New York.
Grabe, W. (2009).Reading in a second language: moving from theory to practice. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Hamka, (2005).The concept of reading. www.aminlimpo.com/2012/05/concepts-of-reading. html. Retrieved February 2021.
Jenkins J. R. & O’Connor R. E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In: Bradley R, Danielson L, Hallahan DP, editors. Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ: 99–149.
Kamhi, A. G., &Catts, H. W., (2012).Language and reading disabilities (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Katzir. T, Kim. Y, Wolf. M & O’Brien. B (2006). Reading Fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56 (1): 51-82.
Kilfoil, W. & Van Der Walt, C. (2007). Learn to teach: English language teaching in multilingual context. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leppanen, U., Aunola, K., Nieman, P. &Nurmi, J. (2008). Letter knowledge predicts grade-4 reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and instruction. 18, 548-564.
Lonigan, C., Schatschneider, C., &Westberg, L. (2008).Results of the national early literacy panel research synthesis: Identification of children's skills and abilities linked to later outcomes in reading, writing, and spelling. In Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel, pp. 55-106. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
L’opez, P. S (2003). The Effect of Phonemic Awareness Instruction on the Reading Development and Spelling Development of Mexican American First Grade Students. University of Houston.
Mc Rae, K., V. de Sa& M. Seidenberg, (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representation for word meaning, Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 126, 99-130.
Moats, L. (1998). Teaching decoding. American Educator, 42–49, 95–96.
Moats, L, &Tolman, C (2009). Excerpted from Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS): The Challenge of Learning to Read (Module 1). Boston: Sopris West.
Mohler, G. M. (2002). The effect of direct instruction in phonemic awareness, multisensory phonics, and fluency on the basic reading skills of low -ability seventh grade students. Unpublished Ph. D Dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Tufis, P. A., &Sperling, R.A. (2008). Are reading and behavior problems risk factors for each other? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 417-436.
National Institute for Literacy, (2008). Developing early literacy; report of the national literacy panel. U. S Department of Education.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence- based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading success. Washington,DC: National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development.
Nelson, W. N. (2010). Language and literacy disorders: Infancy through adolescence. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Oyentunde, T. O. &Muodumogu, C. A., (1999).Effective English teaching in primary and secondary schools: Some basic considerations and strategies. Jos: LECAPS.
Paris, S. (2005). Reinterpretin the development of reading skills. Reading research quarterly. Vol. 40. No. 2.
Plaut, D. (2005). Connectionist Approaches to Reading. In M. Snowling, C. Hulme, and M. Seidenberg (eds.), The science of reading: A handbook, Blackwell: Oxford
Prasongsook, S. (2011).Teaching and learning English at the grade-3 level of primary schools in Thailand: evaluating the effectiveness if three teaching methods. Ph.D. thesis.
Renzulli, J. S. and Reis, S. M. (1994). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Model. Gifted Child Quarterly 38: 2–14.
Renzulli. J.S., &Reis, S.M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning. Mansfield Center, Conn.
Rosenberg M. (2006).Sound and Letter Time: Building, Phonemic Awareness and Alphabet Recognition through Purposeful Play, Haifa: The Gordon Teachers College.
Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. Alfred A. Knopf.
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., &Griffin, P. (eds.) (1998).Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford Press
Stanovich, K. E., (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review,10.72-100
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. Torgesen& B. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87–131). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Torgesen, E. & Mathis, A., (2010). What we know about: effective instructional approaches for language minority learners. Arlington, VA: educational research service.
Tsiadimos, N. S. (2015). Early EFL literacy introduction: a comparative study of whole-word and systematic phonics approaches. Master’s thesis.Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Wolf, M., &Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology,91(3), 415–438.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
