The Kano Model Assessment Framework for Soil Environmental Quality under Good Governance Doctrine of Bank Independence and Accountability for Code of Conduct towards Corporate Ethics

Authors

  • Zharama M. Llarena LLM International Tax Law student, Faculty of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/jsm.1578

Keywords:

Transparency, Accountability, Independence, Corporate Governance, Business Law

Abstract

Purpose: Bank trading is basically observed in their traditional agreements of bargaining products and services. However, in terms of meeting and complying with global economic standards set by WTO to promote sustainable development known as doctrine of good governance, it is certain that corporate practices will be lacking explanatory tools for achieving corporate ethics as their culmination of bank independence and accountability to civil society. This paper aims to map the importance of bank independence and its accountability using Kano model assessment in addressing issues of concerns in trade-environmental problems under WTO economic standards.

Methodology: Soil environmental quality is a quantitative measurement of Kano developmental framework using positivistic paradigm towards legal scholarship defiance of corporate ethics for culmination reflection and plotting the behavior of corporate institutions to eradicate poverty line and promote the economic prosperity of their territory or jurisdiction by answering issues on environmental problems such as soil quality for advocacy of environmental protection under trade-environment conflicts of WTO as accountability to human society for achieving sustainable development following good governance doctrine.

Findings: Business law has a dynamic performance of both the behavior of the corporate and its environment through interactions of human society in their competition market. Innovation of products and corporate services must be integrated with good governance principles using the insufficiency of their code of conduct explanatory authority to enforce trade-environment agreements in achieving human rights of sustainable development in international and global economic standards. The realization of civil rights to sustainable development is reflected with the good governance principle.

Recommendations: The legal scholarship defiance of doctrinal research using positivistic paradigm of objective knowledge can be recommended to other corporate practices to advocate financial intelligence through active participation to environmental calls as political agendas as intended to lessen poverty towards integration to economic transparency and ecological protection. The plotting over time can be predicted towards comparison of constitutional rights of public welfare and safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Briault, C, Haldane, A, & King, M. Central bank independence and accountability: theory and evidence. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, February 1996, 63-68.

Schlemmer-Schulte, S. (2001). The Impact of Civil Society on the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization: The Case of the World Bank. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 7(399), p.399-428.

Kula, CJ. (2002). The Advantages of Utilizing the WTO as a Global Forum for Environmental Regulation. Journal of International Business and Law, Vol. 1(1), Art. 4.

Wiese-Rozanov, L. (2022). Soil organic carbon commitments under three Rio Conventions: Opportunities for integration. Soil Security, Vol. 6, 100052.

Singh, K, Yu, F, Sanderson, T, Fidelis, C, Yinil, D, & Field, DJ. (2022). Building an impact pathway framework for a project through soil connectivity. Soil Security, Vol. 6, 100045.

Bilgilia, B, Ercis, A, & Unal, S. (2011). Kano Model Application in new product development and customer satisfaction (adaptation of traditional art of tile making to jewelries). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 24, p. 829-846.

Lin, F-H, Tsai, S-B, Lee, Y-C, Hsiao, C-F, Zhou, J, Wang, J, & Shang, Z. (2017). Empirical research on Kano's model and customer satisfaction. PLoS One, 12(9: e0183888.

Denkers, J, & Jagers, N. (2008). The World Trade Organization and Human Rights: The Role of Principles of Good Governance. PER/PELJ, Vol 11(2).

Lupo-Pasini, F. (2017). Financial Stability in International Law. Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol. 18(1).

Downloads

Published

2023-09-06

How to Cite

Llarena, Z. . (2023). The Kano Model Assessment Framework for Soil Environmental Quality under Good Governance Doctrine of Bank Independence and Accountability for Code of Conduct towards Corporate Ethics. Journal of Strategic Management, 8(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.47672/jsm.1578

Issue

Section

Articles