Usage and Security of Examination Modes of Assessment: A Survey of Two Universities in South Western Uganda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajodl.820Keywords:
Usage, Security, Electronic Assessment and modes of AssessmentAbstract
Introduction: Academic institutions are faced with challenges related to usage and security of existing modes of assessment. Security issues include confidentiality, integrity and availability while usage issues include complexity, compatibility, accessibility and flexibility.
Methodology: This study assessed three modes of assessment used in universities and these include electronic, paper-based and oral. A cross sectional survey was conducted where quantitative methods were used to determine the mode of assessment that is more secure and acceptable. Participants for the study were students and lecturers from Bishop Stuart University and Mbarara University of Science and Technology. The study population was 411 and a sample of 352 participants was obtained using the Krejcie and Morgan formula. A questionnaire tool was used for data collection and SPSS software was used for data analysis to generate descriptive statistics.
Findings: Results obtained from the study show that usage is ranked at 63.68% for paper based assessment, 68.76% for electronic and 60.28% for oral assessment. Analysis of security issues suggests that electronic assessment (67.72%) is more secure than paper based (63.0%) and oral assessment (62.32%). Although the paper based mode of assessment ranked best in usage, the method faces challenges such as poor computation of marks, poor storage of answer scripts and a slow feedback process. The results show that much as electronic mode of assessment ranked best using security parameters, the mode is not widely used because of its limited question types. Incorporation of various question types in the electronic mode of assessment will increase choice of questions and improve its adoption and usage in academic institutions.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: This study established that, there is need for developing an electronic examinations framework that incorporates various question types, electronic free handwriting and electronic answer booklets to the current university examination process and procedures more robust and appropriate. The study contributes to the body of knowledge since it was found that, in the use of electronic learning technologies in the administration of examinations in Ugandan universities is not robust and appropriate for commonly used essay question types, also it was found out that, these technologies lack electronic free-handwriting, hence the need for a framework to address such gaps.
Downloads
References
A, A. (2018 ). "Uganda struggles with widespread exam fraud, as pupils and teachers perpetuate cheating " Global Press Journal.
Adebayo, O. and S. M. Abdulhamid (2014). "E-exams system for Nigerian universities with emphasis on security and result integrity." arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.0921.
Al-Azawei, A., P. Parslow, et al. (2016). "Barriers and opportunities of e-learning implementation in Iraq: A case of public universities." The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17(5).
Al-Hakeem, M. S. and M. S. Abdulrahman (2017). "Developing a new e-exam platform to enhance the university academic examinations: The case of Lebanese French University." International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science 9(5): 9.
Al-Hujran, O., A. Aloudat, et al. (2013). Challenges to E-learning Success: The student perspective. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information, Business and Education Technology (ICIBET 2013), Atlantis Press.
Alruwais, N., G. Wills, et al. (2018). "Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment." International Journal of Information and Education Technology 8(1): 34-37.
Amongin, F. (2016). Kyambogo students strike over delayed results. daily monitor.
Arinto, P. B. (2016). "Issues and challenges in open and distance e-learning: Perspectives from the Philippines." International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17(2): 162-180.
Ayo, C., I. Akinyemi, et al. (2007). "The prospects of e-examination implementation in Nigeria." Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 8(4): 125-134.
Barros, J. P. (2018). Students' perceptions of paper-based vs. computer-based testing in an introductory programming course. CSEDU 2018-Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, SciTePress.
Burgess, S. and H. H. Sievertsen (2020). "Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education." VoxEu. org 1.
Candrlic, S., M. A. Katić, et al. (2014). Online vs. paper-based testing: A comparison of test results. 2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), IEEE.
Eickholt, J., V. Jogiparthi, et al. (2019). "Supporting Project-Based Learning through Economical and Flexible Learning Spaces." Education Sciences 9(3): 212.
Eke, H. N. (2010). "The perspective of e‐learning and libraries in Africa: challenges and opportunities." Library Review.
El Guemmat, K. O., Sara (2018). "Issues of E-Learning Search Engine and its Challenges." The International Journal of E-Learning and Educational Technologies in the Digital Media (IJEETDM) 4(3): 75-85.
Essel, H. B., P. K. Butakor, et al. (2019). "Summative e-Examination for High Stake Assessment in Higher Education: A Case of Undergraduate Students at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology."
Farzin, S. (2016). "Attitude of Students Towards E-Examination System: an Application of E-Learning." Management Science and Information Technology 1(2): 20-25.
Fayomi, O. O., L. Amodu, et al. (2016). "E-Invigilation: Panacea to Examination Malpractice in Nigeria."
Fee, K. (2013). "Delivering e-learning. A complete strategy for design, application and assessment." Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.
Islam, N., M. Beer, et al. (2015). "E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education." Journal of Education and Training Studies 3(5): 102-112.
Itaaga, N., A. M. Mugagga, et al. (2013). "Apathy among undergraduate education students at Makerere University: An analytical study of the causes and possible solutions." International Journal of Educational Research and Development 2(8): 203-210.
James, R. (2016). "Tertiary student attitudes to invigilated, online summative examinations." International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 13(1): 19.
Joughin, G. (2010). A short guide to oral assessment, Leeds Met Press in association with University of Wollongong.
Kabarungi, M., A. Musiimenta, et al. (2016). "Impact of e-learning management system adoption at Mbarara university of science and technology." International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology 39(2): 62-65.
Kassem, A., Y. Falcone, et al. (2015). Monitoring electronic exams. Runtime Verification, Springer.
Kippers, W. B., C. H. Wolterinck, et al. (2018). "Teachers' views on the use of assessment for learning and data-based decision making in classroom practice." Teaching and teacher education 75: 199-213.
Krejcie, R. V. and D. W. Morgan (1970). "Determining sample size for research activities." Educational and psychological measurement 30(3): 607-610.
Liu, Q. and S. Geertshuis (2016). "Exploring and facilitating learning management system adoption."
Makaula, F. B. (2018). "Perceived causes and methods of examination malpractice in the Malawian education system: A case study of secondary schools in South East Education Division (SEED)."
McGowan, B. S. (2015). "The rise and stall of eLearning: Best practices for technology-supported education." The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 46(7): 292-294.
Memon, M. A., G. R. Joughin, et al. (2010). "Oral assessment and postgraduate medical examinations: establishing conditions for validity, reliability and fairness." Advances in health sciences education 15(2): 277-289.
Mukhaye, D. ( 2017). Makerere students strike over delayed marks, ids. Newvision.
Ndunagu, J. (2013). "The electronic examination in Nigerian universities: A case study of NOUN."
Noesgaard, S. S. and R. Ørngreen (2015). "The Effectiveness of E-Learning: An Explorative and Integrative Review of the Definitions, Methodologies and Factors that Promote e-Learning Effectiveness." Electronic Journal of E-learning 13(4): 278-290.
Oye, N., M. Salleh, et al. (2012). "E-learning methodologies and tools." International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA) 3(2).
Pagram, J., M. Cooper, et al. (2018). "Tales from the exam room: Trialing an E-exam system for computer education and design and technology students." Education Sciences 8(4): 188.
Pandey, N. (2013). "Social benefits of e-learning." KDK College, Journal Jan.
Patel, A. A. (2019). "QuestionMark PerceptionTM: A Novel E-Assessment Tool."
Piirainen, K. A. and R. O. Briggs (2011). Design theory in practice–making design science research more transparent. International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems, Springer.
Rose, S. (2020). "Medical student education in the time of COVID-19." Jama.
Saefurrohman, S. (2018). EFL Teachers Assessment Methods in Oral Communications. 5th Asia Pasific Education Conference (AECON 2018), Atlantis Press.
Sangrà, A., D. Vlachopoulos, et al. (2012). "Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework." International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 13(2): 145-159.
Stevanović, J. A., Srdjan Atanasijević, Tatjana Zahar, Monika (2019). Raising the skills of business analysts–the benefits of elearning technologies in corporate education. The 10th International Conference on e-Learning (eLearning-2019).
Tserendorj, N., U. Tudevdagva, et al. (2013). Integration of learning management system into university-level teaching and learning, Techn. Univ., Fak. für Informatik.
UNESCO (2020). "COVID-19 educational disruption and response."
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
