ASSESSMENT OF BIODEGRADATION EFFECTS OF AGRO-WASTES (POULTRY DROPPINGS AND COW DUNG) ON SOME PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THEIR EFFLUENTS

Authors

  • Meyiwa Stephen Chomini Federal College of Forestry
  • Florence Osaze Federal College of Forestry
  • Osasebor Miriam Ameh Federal College of Forestry
  • Micah Kalu Peter Federal College of Forestry
  • Akunna Emilia Chomini Federal College of Forestry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajes.438

Keywords:

Anaerobic, Co-Digestion, Biogas, Cow dung, Maize Cob

Abstract

Purpose: The biodegradation effects of agro-wastes (poultry droppings and cow dung) on some physico-chemical properties of the effluents were assessed.

 

Methodology: Triplicate slurries (1:3 w/v) of five ratios of poultry droppings and cow dung: (0:1, 1:3, 1:1, 3:1 and 1:0 as treatments A, B, C, D and E) were separately fed into 13.6L locally constructed digesters, under strict anaerobic condition. They were kept for eight weeks retention period. Separate fractions of the undigested and digested treatments were subjected to standard assay procedures to determine their C, N, heavy contents, chemical oxygen demand (COD). The average weekly temperature and the pH before and after digestion of the media were measured.

 

Findings: The cumulative biogas yield was in the order of treatment C (2961.0ml) >D(2241.7ml) > E(2197.9ml) > A(2079.0ml) > B(2031.1ml), based on the following mixing ratios  1:1>3:1>0:1>1:0>1:3. The gas production was affected by weekly temperature variation, which peaked at the mesophilic range (40.5±0.3 ̶ 44.1±0.3OC). The resultant pH of the digestates was in the order of 1:3 > 3:1 > 1:1 > 0:1 > 1:0. There was a general reduction in heavy metal contents for all treatment digestates, except Cu, with 200.00, 35.82 and 7.34% as %increases in treatments A, E and C respectively. All treatments indicated reduction in C:N ratios, ranging from 7.93 ̶ 13.02, in the order of 3:1>1:1>1:3>0:1>1:0. Similarly, there was decrease in COD contents for all treatments due to AD. Consequently, the percentage COD reduction (%CODR) was in the order of treatment D(53.70%) > E(34.15%) > C(29.63%) > A(25.81%) > B(19.23%).

 

Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The biodegradation process had provided an effective means of alternative energy production, agricultural waste management initiative, which would ensure bioremediation, sustainable public health and environmental management

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Meyiwa Stephen Chomini, Federal College of Forestry

Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Florence Osaze, Federal College of Forestry

Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Osasebor Miriam Ameh, Federal College of Forestry

Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Micah Kalu Peter, Federal College of Forestry

Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Akunna Emilia Chomini, Federal College of Forestry

Department of Forestry Technology, Federal College of Forestry, Jos, P.M.B. 2019, Bauchi Road, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

References

Abd-essamad M., Qarraey, I. and Ouatmane, A(2019). Anaerobic Codigestion of Urban Solid Waste Fresh Leachate and Domestic Wastewaters: Biogas Production Potential and Kinetic. Environ. Eng. Res. 24(1), 38-44.

Adebayo, A. O., Jekayinfa., S. O. & Linke, B. (2013). Effect of co-digestion on anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry with maize cob at mesophilic temperature. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 3(7), 47-54.

Adelekan, B. A. & Bamgboye, A. I. (2009). Comparison of biogas productivity of cassava peels mixed in selected ratios with major livestock waste types. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4 (7), 571-577.

Ahemad, M. (2012). Implications of Bacterial Resistance Against Heavy Metals In Bioremediation: A Review. IIOAB Journal, 3(3), 39-46.

Anhuradha, S. G, Vigayagopal, V. Radha, P. & Ramanujam, R. (2007). Kinetic studies and anaerobic co-digestion of vegetable market wastes and sewage sludge. Clean 35 (2) 197 - 199. www. Clean - Journal. Com.

AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,15th ed Washington DC. USA. pp. 123-126.

AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC, 1168p.

APHA, (2005). Standard Method for Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, D. C..1368p.

Ayu, A.O., & Aryanti, V. D.( 2010). Biogas Production Using Anaerobic Biodigester from Cassava Starch Effluent With Ruminant Bacteria As Biocatalyst. Master Thesis. Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Babaee, A., Shayegan,J. & Roshani, A.(2013). Anaerobic slurry co-digestion of poultry manure and straw: effect of organic loading and temperature. Journal of Environmental Health Sciences & Engineering. 11:15.

Baharuddin, A. S., Wakisaka M., Shirai, Y, Abd-Aziz, S., Abdul-Rahman N. A. & Hassan, M. A. (2009a). Co-composting of empty fruit bunch and partially treated palm oil mill effluent in pilot scale: International. Journal of Agricultural Research,4, 69-78.

Bhatnagar S. & R. Kumari (2013). Bioremediation: A sustainable tool for environmental management - A Review. Annual Review and Research in Biology, 3(4), 974-993.

Burak D., Paul, S., Orhan, Y., & Turgut, T. O.(2010). Production of Methane and Hydrogen from Biomass Through Conventional and High-Rate Anaerobic Digestion Processes. Journal Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 116-146.

Chae, K.J., Jang, A, Kim, I.S., Yim, S.K.(2008). The effect of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure. Bioresour Technol, 99:1-6.

Chomini, M.S., Ogbonna, C.I.C., Falemara, B.C. & Micah, P. (2015). Effect of Co-Digestion of Cow Dung and Poultry Manure on Biogas Yield, Proximate and Amino Acid Contents of Their Effluents e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. 8 (11) I (Nov. 2015), PP 48-56 www.iosrjournals.org

Chomini, M.S. (2017). Comparative Studies on Biogas Production From Some Selected Indigenous Substrates and The Effects of Their End-Products on Growth and Performance of Zea mays L.(Maize). (Ph.D Thesis), University of Jos. p. 292.

Dioha, I. J., Ikeme, C.H., Nafi"Ÿu T., Soba, N.I. & Yusuf, M.B.S. (2013). Effect of Carbon to Nitrogen Ratio on Biogas Production. International Research. Journal of Natural. Sciences, 1(3), 1-10.

Fulladosa, E., Murat, J. C., Martínez, M.& Villaescusa, I. (2005a). Patterns of metals and arsenic poisoning in Vibrio fischeri. Chemosphere, 60, 43-48.

Fulladosa, E., Murat, J. C. & Villaescusa, I. (2005b). Study on the toxicity of binary equitoxic mixtures of metals using the luminescent bacteria Vibrio fischeri as a biological target. Chemosphere.58, 551-557.

Ghasimi, S. M. D., Idris, A., Chuah, T. G. & Tey, B. T. (2009). The Effect of C:N:P ratio, volatile fatty acids and Na+ levels on the performance of an anaerobic treatment of fresh leachate from municipal solid waste transfer station. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8 (18), 4572-4581.

Hammed, T. B., Soyingbe, A. A. & Adewole, D. O. (2011). An Abattoir waste water management through composting: A case study of alesinloye waste recycling complex. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences,6(2) : 67-78.

Hasan, k.., Shahriar, A,, Jim, K.U.(2019). Water pollution in Bangladesh and its impact on public health. Heliyon 5,1-23.

Holtan-Hartwig, L., Bechmann, M., Høyås, T. R., Linjordet, R. & Bakken, L. R. (2002). Heavy metals tolerance of soil denitrifying communities: N2O dynamics. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34, 1181-1190.

Jagadish H. P., MALourdu A.R., Gavimath, C. C. and Hooli, V.R.(June-2011). A Comperative Study on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Water Hyacinth With Poultry Litter and Cow Dung. International Journal of Chemical Sciences and Applications. 2(2), 148-155.

Jha,A.K. Li, J., Zhang, L., Ban, Q. and Jin, Y. (2013). Comparison between Wet and Dry Anaerobic Digestions of Cow Dung under Mesophilic and Thermophilic Conditions. Advances in Water Resource and Protection (AWRP),1(2),28-38.

Isroi, M. R., Syamsiah, S., Niklasson, C., Cahyanto, M. N., Lundquist, K.& Taherzadeh, M. J. (2011). Biological Pretreatment of Lignocelluloses with White-Rot Fungi and Its Applications: A Review. Bioresources, 6(4), 5224-5259.

Kassuwi S. A. A., Mshandete A. M. and Kivaisi A. K.( December 2012). Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Biological Pre-Treated Nile Perch Fish Solid Waste With Vegetable Fraction of Market Solid Waste. Arpn Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science. 7 (12),1016-1031.

Lehtomaki, A., Huttunena, S. & Rintala, J. A. (2007a). Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio. Resource Conservation and Recycling, 51 (3): 591-609.

Li, J., Jha, A. K., He, J., Ban, Q., Chang, S. & Wang, P. (2011). Assessment of the effects of dry anaerobic codigestion of cow dung with waste water sludge on biogas yield and biodegradability. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 6(15), 3723-3732.

Lin, C. Y. (1993). Effect of heavy metals on acidogenesis in anaerobic digestion. Water Research, 27, 147-152.

Makádi, M., Tomócsik,A.& Orosz,V. (2012). Digestate: A New Nutrient Source - Review, Biogas, Dr. Sunil Kumar (Ed.), InTech, pp 295-310.

Misi, S. N. & Forster, C. F. (2001). Batch co-digestion of multi-component agro-wastes. Bioresource Technology, 80, 19-28.

Ofoefule, A. U., Nwankwo, J. I. & Ibeto, C. N. (2010). Biogas Production from Paper Waste and its blend with Cow dung. Advances and Applied Sciences Research, 1 (2), 1-8.

Ojolo, S. J., Oke, S. A., Animasahun, K. & Adesuyi, B. K. (2007). Utilization of poultry, cow and kitchen wastes for biogas production: A comparative analysis. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health, Science and Engineering, 4 (4), 232-228.

Orheruata, A.M. and Omoyakhi, J.M. (2008): Livestock-Environment Interaction: Issues and options in Nigeria. Journal of Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. 12(2) 129 - 133.

Rajagopal, R., Mass, D.I., Singh, G., (2013). A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresour. Technol. 143, 632-641.

Sambo, A. S., Etonihu, A. C. And Mohammed, A. M.(November, 2015). Biogas Production From Co-Digestion of Selected Agricultural Wastes in Nigeria. International Journal of Research - Granthaalayah. 3 (11),7-16.

Saev, M., Koumanova, B. & Smeonov, N. (2009). Anaerobic co-digestion of wasted tomatoes and cattle dung for biogas production. Journal of the University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 44 (1), 55-60.

Satisha, G. C. & Devarajan, L. (2007). Effect of amendments on windrow composting of sugar industry pressmud. Waste Management, 27, 1083-1091.

Sobolev, D. & Begonia, M. F. T.(2008). Effects of Heavy Metal Contamination upon Soil Microbes: Lead-induced Changes in General and Denitrifying Microbial Communities as Evidenced by Molecular Markers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2008, 5(5) 450-456.

Souza, A. M., Chaguri, M. P., Castelini, F. R., Junior, J. d. L. & Vidotti, R. M. (2012). Anaerobic bio-digestion of concentrate obtained in the process of ultra filtration of effluents from tilapia processing unit. Research of Brassilian Zootechnology, 41(2), 242-248.

Soyingbe, A. A., Hammed, T. B., Rosiji C. O. & Adeyemi, J. K. (2012). Evaluation of fluted pumpkin (Telfairia occidentalis Hook f.) Waste as nutrient amendment in compost for its effective management and crop production. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology,1(1), 32-38.

Sperling, V. M, & Cherincharo C. A. L. (2005). Principles of anaerobic digestion. In: Biological Waste Water Treatment in Warm Climate Region, 1st edition. IWA publishing, London, UK. 835p.

Sumardiono,S., Syaichurrozi, I., Budiyono, B and Sasongko, S. B. (2013). The Effect of COD/N Ratios and pH Control to Biogas Production from Vinasse. International Journal of Biochemistry Research & Review, 3(4), 401-413.

Umar, H. S., Firdausi, B. R., Sharifah, R. W. A. & Fadimtu, M. (2013). Biogas production through co-digestion of palm oil mill effluent with cow manure. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 21(1), 79-84.

Warren, H. V. & Dela, V. R. E. (1959). Aqua regia extractable copper and zinc in Platonic rocks in relations to ore deposit. Trans. Sect. B., 69: 495-504.

Xie, S., Lawlor, P. G., Frost, J. P., Hud, Z. & Zhan, X. (2011). Effects of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage. Bioresource Technology, 102, 5728-5733.

Yadvika., S., Sreekrishnan, T. R., Kohli, S. & Rana, V. (2004). Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different technique. Bioresource Technology, 95, 1-10.

Zaleckas, E., Sendžikienė, E. and Čiutelytė, R.(2012). Evaluation of Heavy Metals Influence on Biogas Production. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management. 4(62), 14-20.

Zaidi, A, Khan, M.S., Wani, P.A., Ahemad, M. (2009). Bioremediation of heavy metals by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Microbes in sustainable agriculture, Khan MS, Zaidi A, Musarrat J, (eds.) Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA, p. 55-90.

Zayed, G. & Winter, J., (2000). Inhibition of methane production from whey by heavy metals-protective effect of sulfide. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 53, 726-731.

Zhang, T, Liu, L., Song, Z., Ren, G., Feng Y, Han, X. & Yang, G. (2013). Biogas Production by Co-Digestion of Goat Manure with Three Crop Residues. PLoS ONE, 8 (6), 1-7.

Zhu, J., Zheng, Y., Xu, F. & Li.,Y.(2014). Solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of hay and soybean processing waste for biogas production. Bioresource Technology 154, 240-247.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-18

How to Cite

Chomini, M. S., Osaze, F., Ameh, O. M., Peter, M. K., & Chomini, A. E. (2019). ASSESSMENT OF BIODEGRADATION EFFECTS OF AGRO-WASTES (POULTRY DROPPINGS AND COW DUNG) ON SOME PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF THEIR EFFLUENTS. American Journal of Environment Studies, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajes.438

Issue

Section

Articles