Regulatory Compliance and Factors that Influence Compliance with the Nile Perch Slot Size Regulation among Fish Traders in Nairobi County - Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajes.296Keywords:
Compliance, Fisheries regulation, Nile perch, Fish traders, Under size fishAbstract
Purpose: Effective management of fisheries resources can be significantly undermined by non-compliance with regulations. This study sought to determine compliance with the Nile Perch slot size regulation among fish traders in Nairobi County, explore their perceptions on the regulation and determine factors that influence compliance.
Method: The research adopted a combination of both quantitative and qualitative research methods. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to fish traders to determine compliance, obtain a general picture of their attitudes towards compliance and determine factors that influence compliance with the fisheries regulation on Nile Perch slot size requirements. A total of 148 fish traders were enumerated by simple random sampling. Only fish traders dealing with Nile Perch trade were included in the study, three fish traders declined to participate in the study leaving an average response rate of 98%. The questionnaire was followed up with more in-depth semi-structured key informant interviews with 14 stakeholders consisting of fisheries staff deployed to the fish markets and the County fisheries office as well as leaders in the fish market committees in order to obtain a thorough understanding of the factors leading to non-compliance. The average duration of interviews was half hour and were conducted at their places of work. Two focus group discussions (FGDs) were also conducted with fish traders from the two main fish markets in the city in order to provide a deeper understanding of the drivers of non-compliance among fish traders. The FGDs comprised of 12 and 8 members from Gikomba and City markets respectively. Results: The results revealed 87% levels of non-compliance among fish traders. The study revealed that weak enforcement, poverty and lack of knowledge of the importance of the regulation as significant factors for non-compliance.
Policy recommendation: It is recommended that capacity building programmes are necessary to increase voluntary compliance and an effective enforcement is recommended to help deter fish traders from engaging in illegal fish trade.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, N. M. R., Kuperan, K., & Pomeroy, R. S. (1998). Transaction costs and fisheries co-management. Marine Resource Economics, 13(2), 103–114.
Anderson, L. G., & Lee, D. R. (1986). Optimal governing instrument, operation level, and enforcement in natural resource regulation: the case of the fishery. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(3), 678–690.
Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095–1111.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. In The Economic Dimensions of Crime (pp. 13–68). Springer.
Berkes, F. (2001). Managing small-scale fisheries: alternative directions and methods. IDRC.
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.
Berkes, F., Doubleday, N., & Armitage, D. R. (2007). Adaptive Co-management: Collaboration, Learning and Multi-level Governance. UBC Press.
Chavez, C. (2004). Legitimacy, Local Participation, and Compliance in the Galapagos Marine Reserve. In Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings. Econometric Society.
County Government of Nairobi (CGoN), 2014. Nairobi County integrated development plan, 2014. Nairobi city county, Nairobi.
Eggert, H., & Lokina, R. B. (2010). Regulatory compliance in Lake Victoria fisheries. Environment and Development Economics, 15(2), 197–217.
Etiegni, C. A., Ostrovskaya, E., Leentvaar, J., & Eizinga, F. (2011). Mitigation of illegal fishing activities: enhancing compliance with fisheries regulation in Lake Victoria (Kenya). Regional Environmental Change, 11(2), 323–334.
Farm Africa, 2016. Report on market study of the aquaculture market in Kenya. Kenya market-led Programme (KMAP). Lattice Consulting.
Fisheries Act (Revised, 2012). Chapter 378. Laws of Kenya. Government Printer, Nairobi
Fisheries Annual Statistical Bulletin, 2014. Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, State Department of Fisheries. Republic of Kenya, Nairobi
Hatcher, A., Jaffry, S., Thébaud, O., & Bennett, E. (2000). Normative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulations. Land Economics, 448–461.
Hauck, M., & Kroese, M. (2006). Fisheries compliance in South Africa: a decade of challenges and reform 1994–2004. Marine Policy, 30(1), 74–83.
Hønneland, G. (1998). Enforcement and legitimacy in the Barents Sea fisheries. Northern Waters: Management Issues and Practice. London, Blackwell Science.
Hughes, N. F. (1992). Growth and reproduction of the Nile perch, Lates niloticus, an introduced predator, in the Nyanza Gulf, Lake Victoria, East Africa. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 33(3), 299–305.
Jentoft, S., & Kristoffersen, T. (1989). Fishermen’s co-management: the case of the Lofoten fishery. Human Organization, 48(4), 355–365.
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) (2010). The 2009 Kenya population and housing census. Population and household distribution by socio –economic characteristics. Volume II. Nairobi.
Kuperan, K., & Sutinen, J. G. (1998). Blue water crime: deterrence, legitimacy, and compliance in fisheries. Law and Society Review, 309–338.
Lilburn, B. (1986). Management of Australian fisheries: Broad developments and alternative strategies. Mollett (1986), 141–187.
LVFO (2008) The fisheries management plan for Lake Victoria 2009–2014. Prepared through the support of the implementation of the fisheries management plan (IFMP) EDF project NO. 8 ACP POR 029, p 115
Mugenda, O. M. (1999). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. African Centre for Technology Studies.
Nielsen, J. R., & Mathiesen, C. (2001). Important factors influencing rule compliance in fisheries lessons from Danish fisheries.
Nielsen, J. R., & Vedsmand, T. (1999). User participation and institutional change in fisheries management: a viable alternative to the failures of “top-down”driven control? Ocean & Coastal Management, 42(1), 19–37.
Njiru, M., Waithaka, E., Muchiri, M., Van Knaap, M., & Cowx, I. G. (2005). Exotic introductions to the fishery of Lake Victoria: What are the management options? Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management, 10(3), 147–155.
Ogutu‐Ohwayo, R. (2004). Management of the Nile perch, Lates niloticus fishery in Lake Victoria in light of the changes in its life history characteristics. African Journal of Ecology, 42(4), 306–314.
Ogwang, V. O., Nyeko, J. I., & Mbilinyi, R. (2009). Implementing comanagement of Lake Victoria’s fisheries: achievements and challenges. Afr J Trop Hydrobiol Fish, 12, 52–58.
Pomeroy, R. (2007). Conditions for successful fisheries and coastal resources co-management: lessons learned in Asia, Africa, and the wider Caribbean. Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-Level Governance. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 173–187.
Sutinen, J. G., & Andersen, P. (1985). The economics of fisheries law enforcement. Land Economics, 61(4), 387–397.
Sutinen, J. G., & Kuperan, K. (1999). A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance. International Journal of Social Economics, 26(1/2/3), 174–193.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law New Haven. CT: Yale University.
Viteri, C., & Chávez, C. (2007). Legitimacy, local participation, and compliance in the Galápagos Marine Reserve. Ocean & Coastal Management, 50(3), 253–274.
World Bank. 2002. Linking Poverty Reduction and Environmental Management: Policy
Challenges and Opportunities. Washington DC: World Bank.
Young, J. A., Smith, A. P., & Muir, J. F. (1996). Representing the individual fishermen: an attitudinal perspective on one PO’s membership. Marine Policy, 20(2), 157–169.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
