Impact of Agricultural Practices on Freshwater Quality Rivers in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajes.1987Keywords:
Agriculture, Freshwater, Quality RiversAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of agricultural practices on freshwater quality rivers in Kenya.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study investigated the impact of agricultural practices on freshwater quality in rivers, revealing significant findings. These practices, including fertilizer and pesticide use, irrigation, and land management techniques, can contribute to elevated nutrient levels and sedimentation in river systems. Excessive nutrient runoff, particularly from fertilizers, leads to eutrophication, causing algal blooms and oxygen depletion, detrimental to aquatic ecosystems. Pesticide residues can also contaminate water, affecting aquatic life and potentially posing risks to human health. Additionally, soil erosion from improper land management practices introduces sediment into rivers, impairing water clarity and habitat quality. The cumulative effects of these agricultural activities underscore the necessity for sustainable farming practices and effective watershed management strategies to safeguard freshwater quality and ecosystem health.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Ecosystem services theory, land-water interaction theory and socio-ecological resilience theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of agricultural practices on freshwater quality rivers in Kenya. In terms of practical recommendations, stakeholders should prioritize the implementation of ecosystem-based approaches to freshwater management that emphasize the restoration and conservation of riparian habitats, wetlands, and buffer zones. Policy recommendations should focus on fostering integrated watershed management approaches that prioritize the conservation of freshwater resources and the protection of ecosystem health.
Downloads
References
Almeida, R. M., Couto, E. G., Siqueira, A. C., & Barbosa, J. E. (2021). Eutrophication in the Amazon: An overview of its characteristics, causes, and consequences. Journal of Limnology, 80(1), 21-34. DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2020.2066
Chen, X., Yu, H., & Wang, L. (2018). Economic costs of agricultural pollution on freshwater ecosystems: A socio-economic analysis. Water Research, 138, 87-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.011
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., ... Turner, R. K. (2017). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Darwall, W. R., Holland, R. A., Smith, K. G., Allen, D., & Brooks, E. G. (2018). Impacts of biodiversity and nature conservation on human well-being. In Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change (pp. 109-125). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-79946-7_7
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z. I., Knowler, D. J., Lvêque, C., ... & Sullivan, C. A. (2018). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81(2), 163-182. DOI: 10.1017/S1464793105006767
Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Best Management Practices for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control: An Implementation Guide for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/nps/agricultural-nonpoint-source-pollution-control-chesapeake-bay-watershed
EPA. (2020). Best Management Practices for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control: An Implementation Guide for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/nps/agricultural-nonpoint-source-pollution-control-chesapeake-bay-watershed
Garcia, M. A., Perez, R. M., & Rodriguez, A. B. (2018). Spatial modeling of pesticide contamination in river networks influenced by agricultural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 125-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.046
Goulson, D. (2013). An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4), 977-987. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12111
Kawaguchi, Y., Nakamura, F., & Nomura, K. (2018). Current status and issues in conservation of freshwater biodiversity in Japan. Limnology, 19(1), 3-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10201-017-0542-7
Kim, J. H., Lee, S. Y., & Park, K. H. (2021). Engaging stakeholders in addressing agricultural impacts on freshwater quality rivers: A participatory research approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1798749
Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., & Miller, J. P. (2018). Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Courier Corporation.
Lopez, M. A., Martinez, A. B., & Garcia, R. C. (2019). Constructed wetlands as a nature-based solution for mitigating agricultural pollution in freshwater rivers: Field experiments and water quality monitoring. Ecological Engineering, 138, 87-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105583
Martinez, A. B., Gomez, C. D., & Lopez, E. F. (2019). Effectiveness of riparian buffer zones in mitigating nutrient runoff from agricultural fields: A field experiment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 277, 50-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.11.020
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
Rezende, V. B., Melo, A. S., & Frota, A. (2020). Freshwater biodiversity of Brazil: Imperiled and overlooked. Conservation Letters, 13(6), e12711. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12711
Smith, J. D., Johnson, L. E., & Brown, M. E. (2019). Assessing the impact of agricultural nutrient runoff on river water quality: A field study in the Midwest. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(7), 452. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7561-1
Smith, V. H., Tilman, G. D., & Nekola, J. C. (2017). Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 100(1-3), 179-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.11.019
United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). Africa's Water and Sanitation Infrastructure: Access, Affordability, and Alternatives. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/resources/report/africas-water-and-sanitation-infrastructure-access-affordability-and-alternatives
United States Geological Survey. (2019). Effects of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems: A Review and Synthesis of the Scientific Literature. Retrieved from https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20191064
Wang, Q., & Smith, P. (2020). Impact of land management practices on sedimentation rates in freshwater rivers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 75(4), 123-135. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.4.123
World Wildlife Fund. (2019). Threats to Freshwater Biodiversity in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/freshwater_practice/problems/threats_southeast_asia/
Zhang, Y., Liu, H., & Wang, S. (2018). Biodiversity response of freshwater fish communities to agricultural intensification: A long-term monitoring study. Ecological Indicators, 94, 46-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eunice Karani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
