Exploring Funding Models in ‘’No-Fee’’ Schools in Cape Town: Evidence from Selected Public Primary Schools.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajep.1129Keywords:
Funding models, no-fee schools, initiatives, education, South Africa.Abstract
Purpose: The explicit goal of education funding policy is to raise educational standards by addressing historical financial disparities. This study, explored the funding models in three no-fees public primary schools within the Western Cape Education Department in Cape Town. The specific objective of this study was to explore and discuss the funding models’ initiatives of schools in resources scarce communities in Cape Town.
Methodology: A qualitative research model was adopted for the investigation. Semi-structured guided questions were used to obtain the data. Using intentional sampling, which selects individuals based on their backgrounds and expertise, a total of nine people was recruited. Three school principals, three chairs of the governing body, and three administrators of the school's finances made up the group of participants. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, data were recorded using telephone conversations. The researcher used a thematic data analysis approach to analyse the data after recording and meticulously transcribing the talks. Individual interviews, participant data, and document analysis were all merged by the researcher in order to make the research conclusions credible.
Findings: As a result, it was determined whether the information from the case study and the interviews headed in the same direction. Additionally, the researcher gave each participant a chance to confirm that the facts were what they had provided as data. The study indicated that despite receiving 75% of their income from the government, certain no-fee public primary schools still had a high level of resource reliance. A sizeable part of school funding—25%—comes from voluntary donations. The funding attempts, however, have not succeeded in bringing in the money the schools sorely need. Due to government rules, schools feel they have too little money left over and are unable to make significant improvements. The study also showed that fundraising campaigns have an impact on education since they interfere with class time. Additionally, the study demonstrates that learner’s social competition has increased as a result of selling products on campus to raise extra money since learners whose parents cannot afford it do not want to feel afraid or humiliated.
Recommendations: Selected schools should raise funds using stronger and more innovative funding initiatives rather than traditional, hands-on approaches. The government should rethink amending schooling policies to legally accord schools to collect fees, since studies show that parents in low-resource communities are removing their children from low-resource schools to well-resource schools. Governments also need to rethink school policy changes to give schools the flexibility to make significant budget changes.
Downloads
References
Apple MW (2011). Democratic education in neoliberal and neoconservative times. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2011.543850
Ball SJ & Youdell D (2009). Hidden privatization in public education. Education Review, 21(2):73–83.
Beyonyi, E. Y. (2022). An Assessment of Funding Management Strategies in ‘’No Fee’’ Schools in Cape Town: With Specific Reference to Selected Primary Schools. American Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 65 - 80. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajep.1067
Blake B & Mestry R (2014). The changing dimensions of the finances on urban schools: An entrepreneurial approach for principals. Education as Change, 18(1):163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.847017.
Blake BS (2008). The principal as entrepreneur in the management of schools. MEd dissertation. Johannesburg, South Africa: University of Johannesburg.
Bush T, Joubert HJ, Quist D, Chalufu S, Heystek J, Maile S & Van Rooyen J.W. (2004). The Evaluation of School Management Development and Governance training in the Gauteng Province of South Africa. Centre for British Teachers.
Buys, Melanie; du Plessis P and Mestry, Raj. (2020). The resourcefulness of school governing bodies in fundraising: Implications for the provision of quality education. South African Journal of Education Open Access Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 1 - 92020 Article number 2042.
Denscombe, M. (2009). The good research guide for small-scale research projects: Third edition. McGraw Hill Education.
Department of Education (1996). Education White Paper 2: The Organization, Governance and Funding of Schools. Government Gazette, 169(16987):1–46, February 14.
Department of Education (2007). South African Schools Act (84/1996): National norms and standards for school funding. Government Gazette, 507(30322), September 26.
Department of Education, Republic of South Africa (1995). White Paper on Education and Training. Cape Town.
Department of Education, Republic of South Africa (2006). South African Schools Act (84/1996): Regulations to the exemption of parents from payment of school fees in public schools. Government Gazette, 496(29311):1–32, October 18.
Dhillon JK (2013). Senior managers’ perspectives of leading and managing effective, sustainable and successful partnerships. Education Management Administration & Leadership, 41(6):736–750. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143213494186.
Du Plessis P (2012). Budgeting process. In JW van Rooyen (ed). Financial management in education in South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.
Du Plessis, P.J. (2013). Budgeting process. In J. van Rooyen (Ed.), Financial Management in Education in South Africa (pp.77-98). Pretoria. Van Schaik.
Federation of Governing Bodies of South African Schools (FEDSAS) (2014). Environmental analysis 2014 report. Available at https://www.fedsas.org.za/Documents/Management-documents/. Accessed 12 October 2021.
Gornitzka, Å. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education. Higher education, 38(1), 5-31.
Gornitzka, Å., & Maassen, P. (2000). The economy, higher education, and European integration: an introduction. Higher Education Policy, 13(3), 217-223.
Gunter HM (ed.) (2011). The state and education policy: The academic programme. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hall, K., & Giese, S. (2009). Addressing quality through school fees and school funding.
Hargreaves DH (2010). Creating a self-improving school system. Nottingham, England: National College for Leadership of Schools and Children Services. Available at https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/2093/1/download%3Fid%3D133672%26filename%3Dcreating-a-self-improving-school-system.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2021.
Jongbloed, B. (2000). The Funding of Higher Education in Developing Countries & Teekens, H. (eds.) The Financing of Higher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. pp. 13-43.
Kelly KS (1998). Effective fund-raising management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kovalchuk S & Shchudlo S (2014). Revoking of school principals’ roles in the context of educational privatization: A view from Ukraine. European Education, 46(2):32–52. https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934460202.
Le Roux, P., & Breier, B. (2007). Steering from a distance: Funding mechanisms and student access and success in higher education in South Africa. In first annual SANORD Centre conference. University of the Western Cape (pp. 5-7).
Maassen, P. A. M., & Cloete, N. (2002). Global reform trends in higher education. In Transformation in higher education. Global pressures and local realities in South Africa (pp. 13-57). Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd.
Maringe F & Prew M (eds.) (2014). Twenty years of education transformation in Gauteng 1994 to 2014: An independent review. Somerset West, South Africa: African Minds.
Marishane, R.N. (2013). Management of School Infrastructure in the Context of a No-Fee Schools Policy in Rural South African Schools: Lesson from the Field. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 8(5), 1-13.
Mestry &Brian Berry. (2016). The perceptions of stakeholders of the implementation of a state funding model in South African public schools.
Mestry, Raj. (2014) A critical analysis of the National Norms and Standards for School Funding policy: Implications for social justice and equity in South Africa. Educational Management Administration and Leadership Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 851 - 86712 November 2014.
Mestry, Rajkumar and Du Plessis, Petrus. (2020). South Africa: Education Authorities and Public Schools: The Organisation and Impact of Policies in South Africa. Educational Governance Research Volume 13, Pages 371 – 3882020.
Mundy K & Verger A (2015). The World Bank and the global governance of education in a changing world order. International Journal of Educational Development, 40:9–18.
Naicker, Inbanathan and Ncokwana, Zamokwakhe Thandinkosi (2016). From the Horse’s Mouth: School Principals’ Leadership Challenges in Fee and No Fee-Paying Schools. Journal of Social Sciences Volume 49, Issue 1-2, Pages 1 - 101 October 2016.)
Nieuwenhuis FJ & Mokoena S (2005). Decentralisation and the management of change in South African teacher training institutions. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 35(2):127–137.
Ouma, G. W. (2007). Reducing resource dependence on government funding: the case of public universities in Kenya and South Africa. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Cape Town.
Republic of South Africa (1996). Act No. 84, 1996: South African Schools Act, 1996. Government Gazette, 377(17579), November 15.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative science quarterly, 224-253.
Soga NN (2004). Self-managing schools in Gauteng: Challenges and opportunities for school-based managers. MEd dissertation. Pretoria, South Africa: University of South Africa.
Spaull N (2013). Accountability in South African education. In J Hofmeyr & A Nyoka (eds). Transformation audit 2013: Confronting exclusion. Cape Town, South Africa: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation. Available at http://www.africanminds.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/TA-2013-text-and-cover-web1.pdf. Accessed 26 October 2020.
Statistics South Africa (2018). Marginalised Groups Indicator report. Accessed 06/06/2020.
Van Dyk H. and White C.J. (2019). Theory and practice of the quintile ranking of schools in South Africa: A financial management perspective. South African Journal of Education Open Access Volume 39September 2019 Article number 1820.
Van Rooyen JW (ed.) 2012. Financial management in education in South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Van Schaik.
Williams V (ed.) (1995). Towards self-managing schools: A secondary school’s perspective. London, England: Cassell.
Witten AL (2015). Community and schools – closing the gap. In L Albertyn, C Swart & F Bonnici (eds). South African education innovator’s review. Cape Town, South Africa: UCT Graduate School of Business (GSB).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
