Anomaly Detection in Pipeline Operations Using Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2854Keywords:
Monitoring Pipelines; Anomaly Detection; Unsupervised Learning; Semi-Supervised Learning, One-Class SVM, SCADA Systems, Time-Series Data, Fault DetectionAbstract
Purpose: Oil, gas, and water transportation is important through pipeline systems which are susceptible to various anomalies such as structural degradation, malfunctions in operations, and leakages. Older physics-based and rule-based methods of monitoring, despite their interpretability, tend to have low sensitivity, flexibility, and scalability. However, the absence of labeled fault data, increasing operational complexity, and non-stationary pipeline conditions create a critical gap in reliable and scalable anomaly detection solutions for real-world deployment. This study addresses this gap by systematically analyzing data-driven unsupervised and semi-supervised learning approaches and their applicability to pipeline monitoring.
Materials and Methods: New developments in unsupervised and semi-supervised learning have made data-driven anomaly detection schemas able to learn typical operational behavior and detect anomalies with little assistance of labeled fault data. This review gives a detailed summary of these methods within pipeline monitoring. Among the methods discussed are distance- and density-based, statistical and subspace methods, and neural network-based methods, including autoencoders and self-organizing maps. Semi-supervised algorithms such as one-class classification and hybrid statistical-learning are also discussed. The review includes the issues of data characteristics, practices of evaluation, interpretability, and real-time implementation.
Findings: The study identifies and discusses a variety of unsupervised and semi-supervised learning techniques that can effectively address the challenges faced by traditional monitoring methods in pipeline systems. It highlights how these data-driven methods are able to detect anomalies by learning typical operational behavior with minimal reliance on labeled fault data. The study also covers important considerations like data characteristics, evaluation practices, and the challenges of implementing these methods in real-time environments.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: This review provides a thorough evaluation of emerging data-driven anomaly detection methods, contributing to the theoretical understanding of how unsupervised and semi-supervised learning can be applied in pipeline monitoring. The study's practical contribution lies in its exploration of real-world applicability, offering insight into methods that can enhance the sensitivity and scalability of anomaly detection in pipeline systems. For policy, the research suggests future directions, including enhanced feature learning, concept drift adaptation, and integration with digital twins, which aim to improve the trustworthiness and efficiency of anomaly detection in pipeline operations.
Downloads
References
[1] A. B. Klass and D. Meinhardt, "Transporting oil and gas: US infrastructure challenges," Iowa L. Rev., vol. 100, pp. 947, 2014.
[2] Strogen et al., "Environmental, public health, and safety assessment of fuel pipelines and other freight transportation modes," Applied Energy, vol. 171, pp. 266–276, 2016.
[3] V. N. Onyechi, "Pipeline integrity and risk prevention: Real-time monitoring, structural health analytics, and failure mitigation in harsh operating environments," Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 139–151, 2021.
[4] Ho, Michael, et al. "Inspection and monitoring systems subsea pipelines: A review paper." Structural Health Monitoring, 19.2 (2020): 606-645.
[5] O. Erge and E. van Oort, "Combining physics-based and data-driven modeling in well construction: Hybrid fluid dynamics modeling," Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 97, p. 104348, 2022.
[6] M. H. Alobaidi, M. A. Meguid, and T. Zayed, "Semi-supervised learning framework for oil and gas pipeline failure detection," Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 13758, 2022.
[7] D. Sen et al., "Data-driven semi-supervised and supervised learning algorithms for health monitoring of pipes," Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 131, pp. 524–537, 2019.
[8] S. Razvarz, R. Jafari, and A. Gegov, "The importance of pipeline transportation," in Flow Modelling and Control in Pipeline Systems: A Formal Systematic Approach, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–24, 2020.
[9] W. Yu et al., "Gas supply reliability assessment of natural gas transmission pipeline systems," Energy, vol. 162, pp. 853–870, 2018.
[10] S. Razvarz, R. Jafari, and A. Gegov, "Flow modelling and control in pipeline systems," Stud. Syst. Decis. Control, vol. 321, no. 1, pp. 25–57, 2021.
[11] D. Zhukov, S. Konovalov, and A. Afanasyev, "Morphology and development dynamics of rolled steel products manufacturing defects during long-term operation in main gas pipelines," Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 109, p. 104359, 2020.
[12] A. R. Munappy, J. Bosch, and H. H. Olsson, "Data pipeline management in practice: Challenges and opportunities," in International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
[13] M. Golshan et al., "Pipeline monitoring system by using wireless sensor network," IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 43–53, 2016.
[14] S. Anwar et al., "A framework for single and multiple anomalies localization in pipelines," Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2563–2575, 2019.
[15] S. Timashev and A. Bushinskaya, "Methods of assessing integrity of pipeline systems with different types of defects," in Diagnostics and reliability of pipeline systems, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 9–43, 2016.
[16] B. Wong and J. A. McCann, "Failure detection methods for pipeline networks: From acoustic sensing to cyber-physical systems," Sensors, vol. 21, no. 15, p. 4959, 2021.
[17] B. Kraszewski, "A study of thermal effort during half-hour start-up and shutdown of a 400 MW steam power plant spherical Y-pipe," Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 21, p. 100728, 2020.
[18] R. Loubere et al., "ReALE: a reconnection-based arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian method," Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 229, no. 12, pp. 4724–4761, 2010.
[19] J. Tejedor et al., "Machine learning methods for pipeline surveillance systems based on distributed acoustic sensing: A review," Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 841, 2017.
[20] S. S. Aljameel et al., "An anomaly detection model for oil and gas pipelines using machine learning," Computation, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 138, 2022.
[21] E. Güngör and A. Özmen, "Distance and density based clustering algorithm using Gaussian kernel," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 69, pp. 10–20, 2017.
[22] C. Spandonidis, P. Theodoropoulos, and F. Giannopoulos, "A combined semi-supervised deep learning method for oil leak detection in pipelines using IIoT at the edge," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 11, p. 4105, 2022.
[23] A. Ayadi et al., "Kernelized technique for outliers detection to monitoring water pipelines based on WSNs," Computer Networks, vol. 150, pp. 179–189, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pankaj Verma, Krishna Gandhi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.