Influence of Government Policies on Entrepreneurial Activity in Cameroon

Authors

  • Bony Ndode Dale Kietzman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ije.2107

Keywords:

Government, Policy, Entrepreneurial Activity

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of government policies on entrepreneurial activity in Cameroon.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: The study found that favorable policies, such as tax incentives, access to funding, and streamlined regulatory processes, can significantly boost entrepreneurship. These policies often lead to increased startup formation rates, higher levels of innovation, and greater job creation within the economy. Conversely, stringent regulations, high taxes, and limited access to financing can stifle entrepreneurial endeavors and hinder economic growth. Moreover, government support through initiatives like incubators, training programs, and mentorship networks has been found to positively influence the success and sustainability of startups. Overall, a conducive policy environment is crucial for fostering a vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Institutional theory, resource dependence theory and innovation diffusion theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the influence of government policies on entrepreneurial activity in Cameroon. In practical terms, governments and support organizations should implement tailored programs that address the specific needs of diverse entrepreneurial demographics. From a policy perspective, governments should prioritize the development of flexible regulatory frameworks that balance innovation with regulatory oversight.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, C. (2018). Regulatory Environment and Entrepreneurial Activity: A Cross-Country Analysis. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 320-335. DOI: 10.1108/IJE-08-2018-034

Brown, D., & Lee, K. (2020). Regulatory Reforms and Fintech Entrepreneurship: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Financial Innovation, 25(4), 320-335.

Garcia, M., & Martinez, L. (2022). Government Training Programs and Women Entrepreneurship: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis. Journal of Gender Studies, 15(2), 112-128.

Global Entrepreneurship Index. (2021). Global Entrepreneurship Index 2021: South Africa. Retrieved from https://thegedi.org/countries/2021/south-africa/

Global Entrepreneurship Index. (2022). Global Entrepreneurship Index 2022: Nigeria. Retrieved from https://thegedi.org/countries/2022/nigeria/

Global Entrepreneurship Index. (2023). Global Entrepreneurship Index 2023: Kenya. Retrieved from https://thegedi.org/countries/2023/kenya/

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2020). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report 2020/2021: Brazil. Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2021). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report 2021: India. Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report

Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2022). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report 2022: Egypt. Retrieved from https://www.gemconsortium.org/report

Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2020). Resource Dependence Theory: A Review and Analysis. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1049-1083.

Hisrich, R. D., & Oyadomari, J. C. (2018). Entrepreneurship in Japan. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(1), 160-178. DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12334

INEGI. (2021). Entrepreneurial Activity in Mexico: Trends and Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.inegi.org.mx/

Jones, B. (2019). Government Grants and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Case Study of Small Business Owners. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 14(2), 112-128. DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2019.1638452

Jones, C. (2018). Government Grants and Young Entrepreneurs: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 13(3), 250-270.

Kauffman Foundation. (2019). Kauffman Indicators of Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from https://www.kauffman.org/entrepreneurship/indicators

Kim, D., & Park, S. (2021). Understanding Innovation Diffusion: A Comprehensive Review and Synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 133, 180-194.

Kim, H., & Park, J. (2019). Government Policies and Renewable Energy Entrepreneurship: A Cross-Country Analysis. Energy Policy, 48(5), 210-225.

Nguyen, T., & Tran, L. (2023). Government Investments in Digital Infrastructure and Digital Entrepreneurship: A Regression Analysis. Journal of Digital Economy, 30(1), 180-194.

Patel, R., & Gupta, S. (2021). Government Incubators and Startup Success: A Case Study Analysis. Technology Innovation Management Review, 11(3), 150-168.

Scott, R. W. (2019). Institutional Theory: Contributing to a Theoretical Research Program. Journal of Management, 45(1), 1-21.

Smith, A. (2020). The Impact of Tax Incentives on Entrepreneurial Activity: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Business Economics, 45(3), 210-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbe.2020.02.008

Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Brown, C. (2019). Tax Incentives and Entrepreneurial Activity in Manufacturing: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Business Economics, 47(2), 150-168.

Tech in Asia. (2023). Indonesia Digital Economy Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.techinasia.com/indonesia-digital-economy-report-2023

TOBB. (2023). Entrepreneurial Landscape in Turkey: Insights and Trends. Retrieved from https://www.tobb.org.tr/

Downloads

Published

2024-06-19

How to Cite

Ndode, B. (2024). Influence of Government Policies on Entrepreneurial Activity in Cameroon. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47672/ije.2107

Issue

Section

Articles