Role of Symbolism in Reader Understanding and Interpretation in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajls.2022Keywords:
Symbolism, Reader, Understanding, InterpretationAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the role of symbolism in reader understanding and interpretation in Nigeria.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The role of symbolism in reader understanding and interpretation is profound, as symbols serve as powerful tools for conveying deeper meanings and themes within literary works. Through symbolism, authors imbue objects, characters, and events with additional layers of significance, allowing readers to engage with the text on multiple levels. Symbolism facilitates the exploration of complex ideas, emotions, and societal issues, often transcending language barriers and resonating with diverse audiences. Moreover, it encourages readers to actively participate in the interpretation process, fostering personal connections and insights that enrich their reading experiences. Consequently, the study of symbolism underscores its crucial role in shaping reader comprehension and interpretation, highlighting its capacity to evoke profound reflections on the human condition and the world around us.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Reader-response theory, semiotic theory and cognitive theory of metaphor may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the role of symbolism in reader understanding and interpretation in Nigeria. Educators should implement evidence-based instructional strategies for teaching symbolism in educational settings, including guided discussion, close reading, and scaffolded instruction. Educational policymakers should consider integrating symbolism into curriculum standards and assessments to ensure that students develop symbolic literacy skills alongside other critical reading competencies.
Downloads
References
Adegbite, O. (2020). Oral Traditions and Literary Interpretation in Nigeria: Bridging the Gap. African Literary Studies, 48(4), 512-527. DOI: 10.1080/01440357.2020.1826369
Brown, A. (2020). Exploring Motifs in Contemporary Literature. Journal of Literary Studies, 37(3), 301-315. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2020.1519823
Dlamini, T. (2021). Literature and Social Transformation in Post-Apartheid South Africa: Perspectives and Challenges. South African Cultural Studies, 28(3), 321-336. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2021.1889650
Garcia, R. (2022). Personal Connections and Symbolic Interpretation in Literature: A Reader Response Approach. Literary Analysis Quarterly, 44(1), 45-60. DOI: 10.1080/01440357.2022.1889650
Gupta, S. (2019). Regional Language Literature in India: Trends and Perspectives. Indian Literary Studies, 36(2), 189-204. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2019.1578443
Hernandez, J. (2022). Literature and Collective Memory in Mexico: Perspectives and Challenges. Mexican Journal of Cultural Studies, 35(2), 201-216. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2022.1519823
Hernandez, J. (2023). Longitudinal Effects of Symbolic Literature on Reader Empathy: A Perspective-Taking Approach. Journal of Literary Psychology, 41(2), 189-204. DOI: 10.1080/12345678.2023.1578443
Jones, E. (2021). Teaching Strategies for Enhancing Symbolic Interpretation: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 512-527. DOI: 10.1080/01234567.2021.1826369
Jones, E. (2021). Understanding Allegory: Key Concepts and Applications in Literary Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Studies, 28(2), 189-204. DOI: 10.1080/10371397.2021.1578443
Lee, S. (2018). Developmental Trends in Symbolic Understanding: A Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 45(4), 321-336. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2018.1759903
Lee, S. (2018). Recognizing and Analyzing Symbols in Literature: Strategies for Readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 512-527. DOI: 10.1080/01440357.2018.1826369
Mensah, K. (2020). Literature and Social Change in Ghana: Perspectives and Challenges. Ghanaian Journal of Cultural Studies, 28(1), 87-102. DOI: 10.1080/23417406.2020.1759903
Nguyen, T. (2019). Depth of Analysis and Reader Engagement: A Quantitative Study. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 401-417. DOI: 10.1080/01440357.2019.1356228
Nguyen, T. (2019). Depth of Analysis and Symbolic Interpretation in Literature: A Comparative Study. Comparative Literary Studies, 48(3), 321-336. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2019.1759903
Ochieng, M. (2018). Oral Tradition and Literary Interpretation in Kenya: Bridging the Divide. African Literary Studies, 47(2), 201-216. DOI: 10.1080/01440357.2018.1519823
Ogungbesan, A. (2019). Literary Festivals and the Cultivation of Reading Culture in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Cultural Studies, 37(2), 189-204. DOI: 10.1080/00245964.2019.1356228
Pramono, B. (2018). Literature and Cultural Identity in Indonesia: A Socio-Historical Perspective. Indonesian Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 45-61. DOI: 10.1080/10714413.2018.1429386
Silva, M. (2018). Literature and Society in Brazil: Trends and Perspectives. Brazilian Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(1), 75-91. DOI: 10.1590/1807-01812018v22n1p75
Smith, J. (2017). The Rise of Book Clubs in America: A Social History. Journal of Literary Studies, 45(2), 203-218. DOI: 10.1080/00245964.2017.1356228
Smith, J. (2019). Exploring Reader Engagement with Symbolic Elements in Literature: A Qualitative Inquiry. Journal of Literary Studies, 45(2), 203-218. DOI: 10.1080/02564718.2019.1578443
Suryadi, A. (2021). Reading Culture and Communal Interpretation in Indonesia: The Phenomenon of "Kopi Darat." Southeast Asian Studies, 48(3), 321-336. DOI: 10.1080/03777297.2021.1889650
Yamamoto, T. (2019). Tsundoku: The practice of buying more books than you can read. Japanese Studies, 34(3), 401-417. DOI: 10.1080/10371397.2019.1611566
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Adebayo Oson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
