THE STRATEGIC ROLE PLAYED BY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS IN ENHANCING SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE PERFOMANCE: A SURVEY OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN KENYA

Authors

  • Stephen Kariuki Daystar university
  • Kefah Njenga Daystar University
  • Dan Irungu Daystar University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/jsm.152
Abstract views: 206
PDF downloads: 226

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Performance, Board size

Abstract

Purpose: The general purpose of study was to establish the strategic role that corporate governance mechanisms play in the sustainable corporate performance of commercial banking sector in Kenya.

Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive research design. The actual population was also the targeted population was 43 banks since the banks were all accessible. A total of 17 banks were used as an actual sample representing 37% of the total population. The researcher in this study used questionnaire as a data collection tool. The data collected was analyzed by use of both inferential and descriptive statistics.

Results: Study findings indicated that, there was an insignificant relationship between percentage mean of independent directors, top 10 shareholding and ROA. In addition there was an insignificant relationship between board size, percentage mean of independent directors, top 10 shareholding and individual shareholding, and Customer satisfaction index.

Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommends that, commercial banks in Kenya should continue adhering to corporate governance requirements since it may have positively contributed to sustainable performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Stephen Kariuki, Daystar university

Post graduate student

Kefah Njenga, Daystar University

Lecturer, Daystar University

Dan Irungu, Daystar University

Lecturer, Daystar University

References

Agency Costs & Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 3, pp. 305-6.

Cadbury, A., 1992, Report of the on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London, Gee & Co.

Carver, J. & C. Oliver, 2002, Corporate Boards that Create Value: Governing Company Performance From the Board Room. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, John Wiley

Claessesn,S.,(2003). Corporate governance and development. Copyright 2003.The international Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433.

De Jong, Abe, Carles Gispert, Rezaul Kabir & Luc Renneboog (2002). “International Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis”, Second Draft, May

Evaluation. Master of Business in The Faculty Of Business And Enterprise Swinburne University Of Technology.

Fama, Eugene F. & Michael C. Jensen (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics 26, no. 2: 327-349.

Jensen, M.C. & Meckling W.H. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior,

Shidvasani. A (1993). Board composition, ownership structure and hostile takeovers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16. This issue.

Siladi,B.,(2006). The Role Of Non-Executive Directors In Corporate Governance:

Downloads

Published

2017-01-17

How to Cite

Kariuki, S., Njenga, K., & Irungu, D. (2017). THE STRATEGIC ROLE PLAYED BY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS IN ENHANCING SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE PERFOMANCE: A SURVEY OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN KENYA. Journal of Strategic Management, 1(2), 24 - 45. https://doi.org/10.47672/jsm.152

Issue

Section

Articles