Gender Disparities in Leadership Positions in Asia

Authors

  • Keiko Akira National University of Singapore (NUS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ejgs.1957

Keywords:

Gender, Disparity, Leadership Positions

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess gender disparities in leadership positions in Asia.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: The study indicated that women are consistently underrepresented in top leadership roles across various sectors, including corporate, political, and academic domains. The study revealed numerous factors contributing to this gap, including implicit bias, gender stereotypes, lack of mentorship opportunities, and work-life balance challenges. Additionally, cultural and institutional barriers hinder women's advancement, such as the glass ceiling phenomenon and the scarcity of family-friendly policies in workplaces. While progress has been made in recent years, with initiatives aimed at promoting gender equality and diversity in leadership, persistent disparities underscore the need for continued efforts to address systemic barriers and foster inclusive environments that empower women to pursue and thrive in leadership roles.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social role theory, glass ceiling theory and implicit bias theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the gender disparities in leadership positions in Asia. Implement diversity and inclusion training programs to raise awareness of unconscious biases and promote gender-neutral decision-making processes in leadership selection, promotion, and performance evaluation. Advocate for legislative measures to promote gender diversity on corporate boards and executive teams, such as quotas or disclosure requirements, to accelerate progress towards gender-balanced leadership representation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2019). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Delacorte Press.

Catalyst. (2017). Quick take: Women in S&P 500 companies. Catalyst. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.11.007

Catalyst. (2021). Quick take: Women in the European labor market. Catalyst. Retrieved from https://www.catalyst.org/

Chen, L., (2019). Exploring the impact of sleep duration and disturbances on cognitive functions and academic performance among high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(2), 85-92.

Commission for Employment Equity. (2019). Annual report 2018-2019. Commission for Employment Equity. https://www.employment-equity.org.za/

Cranfield School of Management. (2020). Female FTSE board report 2020: Turning the dial. Cranfield School of Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2019.07.001

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2018). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 62-71.

European Commission. (2019). Gender equality in the EU: Annual report 2019. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/

INEGI. (2020). Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo (ENOE) - Datos Trimestrales. National Institute of Statistics and Geography. https://www.inegi.org.mx/

Inter-American Development Bank. (2018). Women's leadership in Latin America and the Caribbean: The journey to equality. Inter-American Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001432

Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2019). Results of the survey on corporate governance of listed companies. Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2019.95.11391

Johnson, R., (2017). The relationship between sleep quality and academic performance among high school students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 964-977.

Kabeer, N. (2016). Gender equality, economic growth, and women's agency: The "endless variety" and "monotonous similarity" of patriarchal constraints. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 295-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1126263

Kaul, R. (2018). Gender inequality and women's empowerment in India: A brief overview. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(2), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-07-2017-0311

Lee, H., & Chang, S. (2020). Effectiveness of a sleep intervention program on the academic performance of high school students: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of School Health, 90(3), 176-183.

Loden, M., & Graham, M. (2018). Women and the glass ceiling: The 21st century challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(1), 41-49.

Matsuo, M., & Takano, M. (2018). Gender inequality in the boardroom: Evidence from Japan. International Journal of Human Ecology, 19(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-018-09391-x

McKinsey & Company. (2019). Women in the workplace India: The state of women in corporate India. McKinsey & Company. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0855

Sánchez, G. (2017). Women in leadership positions in Mexico: Gender quotas and tokenism. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 42(3), 312-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2017.1354999

Smith, A. (2018). Gender disparities in leadership positions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4), 312-325.

Smith, J. (2020). Gender disparities in leadership positions in European corporations: A review of the literature. European Journal of Gender Studies, 27(3), 321-336.

World Bank. (2020). Brazil: Gender gap in the labor market. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1229-9

Downloads

Published

2024-04-27

How to Cite

Akira, K. . (2024). Gender Disparities in Leadership Positions in Asia. European Journal of Gender Studies, 6(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.47672/ejgs.1957

Issue

Section

Articles