Land and Boundary Conflicts in Russia and Former Soviet Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ejcm.1457Keywords:
Land Conflicts, Resolution, Russia, Former Soviet Countries, Mediation, Arbitration, LitigationAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the nature and resolution of land and boundary conflicts in Russia and former Soviet countries.
Materials and Methods: The study adopted a desktop methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low-cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Results: The literature review on environmental mediation in Bolivia reveals significant impacts on conflict management, including changes in dispute resolution approaches, mediator roles and outcomes. Indigenous and community mechanisms emphasize land rights, resource control and livelihoods, influencing contemporary practices. However, integration also raises concerns about cultural identity, self-governance and ecological preservation. Balancing community principles with state environmental laws proves difficult. Strict adherence to indigenous doctrines limits innovation while adaptations undermine cultural identity.
Recommendations: This study contributes to the theoretical understanding of land and boundary conflicts in Russia and former Soviet countries by synthesizing existing literature and providing a comprehensive analysis of the drivers, patterns, and impacts of these conflicts. The study offers insights into the practical implications of land and boundary conflicts, including the need for effective governance, inclusive decision-making processes, and sustainable resource management. The findings can inform policymakers, practitioners, and scholars in developing strategies to address land and boundary conflicts, foster peacebuilding, and promote regional stability in the context of Russia and former Soviet countries. The study also identifies gaps and areas for further research, highlighting the complex and dynamic nature of land and boundary conflicts in this region.
Downloads
References
Agnew, J. A. (2002). A map is not the territory: Textual analysis and geographical space. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), 782-795.
Allison, R. (2008). Russia's estrangement from Europe. International Affairs, 84(4), 711-733.
Banerjee, R. (2016). Marginalized voices in borderland spaces: Livelihood struggles in peripheral spaces. Geoforum, 75, 142-151.
Baskaeva, A. (2013). Migration in the context of land use conflicts in Russia: a case study of the Baikal region. International Migration, 51(2), 71-85.
Bowen, W. B. (2010). The history of pharmaceuticals in the former Soviet Union. Drug Safety, 33(5), 371-384.
Brown, A. W. & Richardson, D. (2016). Theorizing landscapes in geographical thought: Identity, place and subjectivity. Progress in Human Geography, 40(4), 432-450.
Croft, S. (2012). Russia's Middle East policy and the question of Palestine. The Review of International Affairs, 11(4), 103-119.
DeLeon, J. P. (2018). Moral reasoning and policy change: Reframing territorial disputes in the former Soviet Union. Policy Studies, 39(1), 51-68.
Engstrom, J. B. (2015). Territorial disputes and border conflict resolution. Geopolitics, 20(3), 670-698.
Golubchikov, O., Didyk, M. & Sadovska, T. (2017). Urban land governance and conflicts in Ukraine: Actors, interests and narratives. Cities, 70, 41-49.
Hale, H. E. (2008). The nation and the state in Russia and Iran after the state: Power, politics, governance and democratic transformation. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(1), 3-17.
Heldt, B. (2013). Border disputes in the former Soviet sphere. Energy Research & Social Science, 2, 38-45.
Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1999). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton University Press.
Ivanova, A., Bezborodova, N. & Ivanov, A. (2018). The socio-economic impact of land use conflicts in rural peripheral areas of Russia: A case study of the North Caucasus region. Land Use Policy, 73, 709-720.
Kerimov, A. (2018). Ethnic migration, displacement and multiethnic relations in territorial conflicts: A case study of the Tabilinka locality in the Vardzia region of Georgia. Nationalities Papers, 46(4), 708-733.
Khutyrov, T. (2017). Management of land resources in spatial planning and management of environment quality. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 71(1), 012141.
Kolossov, V., Kristof, M. & Šafaříková, M. (2015). Cross-border cooperation of border regions in Central and Eastern Europe in the field of resolving territorial disputes. Quaestio Geographica, 34(4), 99-111.
Kuznetsova, A., Kolossov, V., Dijkink, J. & Paasi, A. (2020). Legalized boundaries or border disputes: How does international law matter in political boundaries evolution? Political Geography, 78, 102166.
Lynch, D. (2013). Russia's Policy in the Caucasus region. Caucasus Survey, 1(1), 93-107.
Nzongola-Ntalaja, G. (2002). The Congo from Leopold to Kabila: A People's History, trans. by John Conteh-Morgan. London: Zed Books.
Ogorkiewicz, R. M. (2010). Territorial disputes and their resolution: Contrasting approaches. Geopolitics, 15(2), 290-310.
Orudzhev, K.M. (2019). Ecological consequences of border conflicts between states. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 220(1), 012001.
Panossian, R. (2006). The Armenians: From kings and priests to merchants, mecenates, soldiers, and revolutionaries. Leiden: Bril.
Petersen, A. D. (2012). Russia's border disputes in historical context. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 53(5), 645-661.
Ponomarenko, L. N. (2011). Border policy of the Russian Federation: legal regulation, contemporary state and future perspectives. Eurasian Law Journal, (4), 58-66.
Smith, G. A. (2014). Territorial disputes and resource wars: Spatial structures as narratives of conflict. Progress in Human Geography, 38(5), 621-639.
Tkacheva, E. (2014). Socio-political transformation effects on spatial development of border regions in post-Soviet countries: The case of Russia and Kazakhstan. Quaestio Geographica, 33(4), 99-111.
Ttkhe, D. (2017). Geopolitical rivalry in the Caucasus: Cultural borders and regional powers in an ethnically diverse space. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58(4), 458-479.
Veselovsky, M. Y. (2016). Border security in the Asia-Pacific region: Potential sources of conflict and perspectives of resolution. Russia in Global Affairs, 14(2).
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill Humanities Social Sciences Languages.
Wilson, A. (2014). The Crimean Crisis and the Changing Baltic Security Complex. Baltic Security & Defence Review, 16(2), 5-19.
Woehrel, S. (2016). Russia's territorial disputes with neighbors: Issues and implications. DIANE Publishing.
Wolfe, A. E. (2016). Strategic Studies Quarterly. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 10(1), 151-156.
Zevelev, I. (2017). Border conflicts between Russia and neighboring countries in the post-Soviet space: Lessons learned and suggestions on peaceful resolution. Geopolitics, 22(3), 659-684.
Zhorov, M. B. (2015). Territorial disputes in the Asia-Pacific region: From the historical perspective to modern challenges. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, (3), 165-171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 European Journal of Conflict Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
