Servant Leadership, Cultural Dimension, and Adversity Quotient: A Causal Model on Organizational Resilience of the Local Government Units’ Employees in Davao Region

Authors

  • Melvin A. Montejo Post Graduate Student, Doctor in Public Administration, University of Mindanao
  • Dr. Alberto N. Bandiola Doctor in Public Administration, University of Mindanao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.1625
Abstract views: 191
PDF downloads: 139

Keywords:

Public Administration, Servant Leadership, Cultural Dimension, Adversity Quotient, Organizational Resilience, Structural Equation Model, Philippines

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to determine the best-fit model for organizational resilience of local government unit employees regarding servant leadership, cultural dimension, and employees' adversity quotient. The descriptive-causal method and non-experimental quantitative research design were applied. Organizations considerably give these effects of the worrying manifestations attention to guarantee social support in times of need. Resilient leaders should have access to trusted peers and social groups, time, reflection, collaboration, and conversational development chances that request to reduce social seclusion and more chances for partnerships. In this context, the researcher was prompted to conduct the study to determine whether servant leadership, cultural dimension, adversity quotient, and the employees' resilience, especially in local government units, should be strengthened in response to adverse circumstances. Therefore, this would fill the gap, as supported by the literature regarding the local setting.

Methodology: Three hundred ninety-three employees from six cities in Davao Region were surveyed using standardized adapted instruments. The survey questionnaire used was validated and approved by experts. The respondents were selected through a stratified sampling technique. Data were analyzed using the Mean, Pearson r, Regression Analysis, and Structural Equation Modeling.

Findings: Results revealed that all variables gained a very high level. The result of the study also revealed an overall significant relationship and influence between the exogenous and endogenous variables. Furthermore, the best-fit model for organizational resilience was generated and demonstrated a direct effect in Model 5, and the goodness of fit measures' requirements were met. It is detected that there is a correlation between the exogenous and Endogenous variables. The important relationship between the exogenous and endogenous variables, which predicts the study's findings, is a pronouncement that being resilient and adverse to a chaotic situation could be effective and useful to withstand an employee's life

Recommendations: The suggestion between the Exogenous and Endogenous in creating organizational resilience in municipal governments should be essentially measured. This is recommended to the Human Resource Management that embraces and exercises the practice of being efficient in their work and responsibilities to impart individual adversity consciousness and cultivate the employees from training and development. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barasa, E., Mbau, R., & Gilson, L. (2018). What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(6), 491.

Basilio, R. D., Cueto, M. M., Dumas, E. M., Ortega, M. J. B., Zapata, J. D., & Bautista, M. L. A. (2017). Job Satisfaction Levels of PNP Employees in a Provincial City. College of Criminology Research Journal. Retrieved from http://research.lpubatangas.edu.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/ CRIM-2017-002.

Bernard, N. T. (2018). The relationships between resilience, job satisfaction, and anticipated turnover in chief nursing officers (Order No. 10839061). Available from ProQuest Central. (2088030015). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2088030015?accountid=3 1259

Besuner, P. L. (2017). Leadership attributes and behaviors as predictors of organizational resilience in academic health care systems (Order No. 10253605). Available from ProQuest Central. (1855179834).

Blanning, T. C. (2016). Frederick the Great: King of Prussia. London: Penguin Books.

Brendtro, L. K., & Longhurst, J. E. (2005). The resilient brain. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 14(1), 52-60. Retrieved from EbscoHost database.

De Mooij, M. (2010). Global Marketing and Advertising, Understanding Cultural Paradoxes (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

De Mooij, M. & Hofstede, G. (2002). Convergence and divergence in consumer behavior: implications for international retailing. Journal of Retailing, 78, pp. 61-69.

Dierendonck. D. V. Nuijten. I. & Heeren. I. (2009). Servant Leadership, key to follower well-being. In Thosvold. D. & Wisse. B. (Eds.). Power and Interdependence in Organizations. New York. NY: Cambridge. 319:337.

Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2014). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The Globe Study of 62 Societies, SAGE Publications.

Jackson, T. (2002). The Management of People Across Cultures: Valuing People Differently. Human Resource Management 41: 455–475.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (p. 34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Latendresse, S. J., & Luthar, S. S., (2005). Perceptions of parenting among affluent youth: Antecedents of middle school adjustment trajectories. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Linnenluecke, M. K., (2017). Resilience in business and management research: a review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4-30.

Liu, Z. A. (2016). Study on the development of structure model of engagement for knowledge employee. Business management, 11, 65-69.

Louis, K. S., & Murphy, J. F. (2018). The Potential of Positive Leadership for School Improvement: A Cross Disciplinary Synthesis. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 2(2–3), 164– 180.

Markman, G. (2000). Adversity Quotient: The role of personal bounce-back ability in new venture formation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 281-301.

Masten, A. S., & Obradovic, J. (2008). Disaster preparation and recovery: lessons from research on resilience in human development. Ecol Soc 13(1):9.

Maxwell, J.A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE, California.

McCullough, M. E., Bono, G., & Root, L. M. (2007). Rumination, affect, and forgiveness: Three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 490-505.

Menon, S. T. (1999). Psychological Empowerment: Definition, Measurement, and Validation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 31: 161–164.

Moss, G. (2011). Personality, design and marketing: Matching design to customer personality. Retrieved from https:// www.ctrtraining co. ukdocuments

Mowbray, D. (2012). Guide to personal resilience: Strengthening personal resilience. Retrieved from www.mas.org.ukpublications

Nuijten, I., & van Dierendonck, D., (2011). The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure. Journal of Business & Psychology, 26, 249-267.

Näswall, K., Malinen, S., Kuntz, J., & Hodliffe, M. (2019). Employee resilience: Development and validation of a measure. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(5), 353-367.

Nicomedes, C. J. C., & Avila, R. M. A. (2020). An analysis on the panic of Filipinos during COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines.

O’Dwyer, L. M., & Bernauer, J. A. (2013). Quantitative non-experimental research. University of Phoenix, USA. Retrieved from https://research.phoenix.edu.com.

Peterson S. J, Galvin B. M., & Lange, D. (2012). CEO servant leadership: exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology 65(3): 565–596.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Simmons, N., & Marquis, E. (2017). Defining the scholarship of teaching and learning, The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2) 1-3.

Smylie, M., Murphy, J., & Karen, S. L. (2020). Caring School Leadership. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Corwin.

Stoltz, P. G. (2012). Adversity quotient at work: Make everyday challenges the key to your success-putting the principles of AQ into action. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com

Teo, W. L., Lee, M., & Lim, W. S. (2017). The relational activation of resilience model: How leadership activates resilience in an organizational crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(3), 136-147.

Turgeon, P. E. (2019). Identifying the leadership skills needed to develop the competencies to lead in a postcrisis organization: A delphi study (Order No. 27735133). Available from ProQuest Central. (2346618379). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/2346618379?accountid=3 1259

Ungar, M., Ghazinour, M., & Richter, J. (2013). What is resilience within the social ecology of human development? The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 348-366.

Van Dierendonck, D., & Heeren, I. (2011). Toward a research model of servant- leadership. The International Journal of Servant- Leadership, 2, 147–169.

Walsh, W. A., Dawson, J., & Mattingly, M. J. (2010). How are we measuring resilience following childhood maltreatment? Is the research adequate and consistent? What is the impact on research, practice, and policy? Trauma Violence Abuse, 11, 27–41.

Whitaker, R. C., Gehris, J. S., & Gooze R. A. (2014). Teachers' perceptions about children's movement and learning in early childhood education programmes. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12136 Publisher.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-25

How to Cite

Montejo, M. ., & Bandiola, A. . (2023). Servant Leadership, Cultural Dimension, and Adversity Quotient: A Causal Model on Organizational Resilience of the Local Government Units’ Employees in Davao Region. American Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 8(2), 75 - 98. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.1625