Effect of Policy Network Legitimacy on Policy Process Outcomes in the Road Transport Sector in Nairobi City County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.1334Keywords:
Policy network, policy network legitimacy, policy process outcomes, transport sector, KenyaAbstract
Purpose: The legitimacy of a policy network is an important factor in determining the success of a policy process. It can help to ensure that the policy process is conducted in a transparent and accountable manner, and that the decision-making process is based on sound evidence and effective consultation. It also ensures that the policy process outcomes are based on consensus rather than on the interests of any particular group, builds trust between stakeholders and the government, which can help to ensure that the policy process is implemented effectively as well as help to enhance public participation in the policy process, which can lead to better policy outcomes. Given the limited empirical focus of the previous studies on the role of policy network legitimacy in achieving policy process outcomes, this study sought to establish the relationship between the two.
Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive design. The target population of the study was 470 policy actors in the road transport sector within Nairobi City County out of which 407 were sampled to respond to the questionnaire and 45 were sampled to participate in focused group discussions as well as key informant interviews. The sampling approach adopted was a purposeful sampling procedure. A mixed methodology was adopted whereby both quantitative and qualitative data was collected through structured questionnaires, Key Informant Interviews and focused group discussions. The quantitative data was analyzed through descriptive statistics that is mean, frequencies and percentages as well as regression analysis. On the other hand, qualitative data was analysed through thematic analysis and reported in a narrative format.
Findings: The study established that the level of policy network legitimacy in road transport sector within Nairobi City County, Kenya was very high and this was associated with a significant improvement in the policy process outcomes.
Recommendations: The study recommends a need for an increase public participation by the policy makers in the transport department in Nairobi City County, Kenya. The study also recommend establishment of clear guidelines and rules for the policy network that all members must follow to ensure accountability. The study also recommend a transparent process for the policy network as well as promotion of accountability by ensuring all members of the policy network are held accountable for their actions.
Downloads
References
Almeida, L. D. A., & Gomes, R. C. (2018). The process of public policy: literature review, theoretical reflections and suggestions for future research. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 16, 444-455.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J, (2017). Strengthening political leadership and policy innovation through the expansion of collaborative forms of governance. Public Management Review, 19(1), 37-54.
Barasa, E. W., Molyneux, S., English, M., & Cleary, S. (2015). Setting healthcare priorities in hospitals: a review of empirical studies. Health policy and planning, 30(3), 386-396.
Di Gregorio, M., Massarella, K., Schroeder, H., Brockhaus, M., & Pham, T. T. (2020). Building authority and legitimacy in transnational climate change governance: Evidence from the Governors' Climate and Forests Task Force. Global Environmental Change, 64, 102126.
Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 114-125.
Durnova, A., Fischer, F., & Zittoun, P. (2016). Discursive approaches to public policy: Politics, argumentation, and deliberation. In Contemporary approaches to public policy (pp. 35-56). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Fischer, M. (2017). Institutions and policy networks in Europe. Oxford handbook of political networks, 833-854.
Fischer, M., & Schläpfer, I. (2017). Metagovernance and policy forum outputs in Swiss environmental politics. Environmental Politics, 26(5), 870-892.
Hofmann, E., Hartl, B., Gangl, K., Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., & Kirchler, E. (2017). Authorities' coercive and legitimate power: the impact on cognitions underlying cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 5.
Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Koppenjan, J. (2017). Policy learning and policy networks in theory and practice: The role of policy brokers in the Indonesian biodiesel policy network. Policy and Society, 36(2), 233-250.
Ingold, K., Fischer, M., & Cairney, P. (2017). Drivers for policy agreement in nascent subsystems: an application of the advocacy coalition framework to fracking policy in Switzerland and the UK. Policy studies journal, 45(3), 442-463.
Klopp, J. (2015). Politics, policy and paratransit: A view from Nairobi. In Paratransit in African cities (pp. 95-115). Routledge.
Klopp, J. M., & Petretta, D. L. (2017). The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, 63, 92-97.
Klopp, J. M., & Cavoli, C. (2019). Mapping minibuses in Maputo and Nairobi: engaging paratransit in transportation planning in African cities. Transport Reviews, 39(5), 657-676.
Koliba, C., & Zia, A. (2011, June). Theory Testing Using Complex Systems Modeling in Public Administration and Policy Studies: Challenges and Opportunities for a Meta-"Theoretical Research Program. In Proceedings of the 2011 Public Management Research Conference, Maxwell School of citizenship and public affairs at Syracuse University.
Konyango, T. O. (2019). Influence of Governance on Public Policy Implementation in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, JKUAT-COHRED).
Larson, E. (2017). Demand for credit, international financial legitimacy, and vulnerability to crises: Regulatory change and the social origins of I celand's collapse. Regulation & Governance, 11(2), 185-202.
Mabeya, D. O. (2020). The Question of Legitimacy: Kenya's Recognition Policy of Governments under Moi during the Cold War-Eastern Africa Countries (1978-1990). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, 2(6), 260-270.
Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238-251.
Mbithi, A., Ndambuki, D., & Juma, F. O. (2019). Determinants of public participation in Kenya county governments. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 54(1), 52-69.
Mees, H., & Driessen, P. (2019). A framework for assessing the accountability of local governance arrangements for adaptation to climate change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), 671-691.
Mitullah, W. V., & Opiyo, R. (2017). Non-motorized transport infrastructure provision on selected roads in Nairobi. In Non-Motorized Transport Integration into Urban Transport Planning in Africa (pp. 90-111). Routledge.
Muthomi, F., & Thurmaier, K. (2021). Participatory transparency in Kenya: Toward an engaged budgeting model of local governance. Public administration review, 81(3), 519-531.
Peters, B. G. (2018). Policy problems and policy design. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Poku-Boansi, M., & Marsden, G. (2018). Bus rapid transit systems as a governance reform project. Journal of transport geography, 70, 193-202.
Rau, H., Hynes, M., & Heisserer, B. (2016). Transport policy and governance in turbulent times: Evidence from Ireland. Case studies on transport policy, 4(2), 45-56.
Romzek, B., LeRoux, K., Johnston, J., Kempf, R. J., & Piatak, J. S. (2014). Informal accountability in multisector service delivery collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 813-842.
Sandström, A., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2014). Legitimacy in co"management: The impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(1), 60-76.
Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and "˜throughput'. Political studies, 61(1), 2-22.
World Bank (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0950-7
Zhang, Q., Geerlings, H., El Makhloufi, A., & Chen, S. (2018). Who governs and what is governed in port governance: A review study. Transport Policy, 64, 51-60.
Zyl, V. A. (2014). How civil society organizations close the gap between transparency and accountability. Governance, 27(2), 347-356.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cornelius Ombagi, Prof. David Minja, Dr. Wilson Muna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
