Judicial Sentencing Disparities: A Study of the Influence of Socioeconomic Status in Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.2000Keywords:
Judicial, Sentencing Disparities, Socioeconomic StatusAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the judicial sentencing disparities: a study of the influence of socioeconomic status in Ethiopia.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: It reveals a significant correlation between SES and the severity of sentences handed down by the judiciary. Individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds tend to receive harsher punishments compared to their wealthier counterparts for similar offenses. This phenomenon persists across various jurisdictions and highlights systemic inequalities within the criminal justice system. Factors such as access to legal representation, education, and community support systems contribute to these disparities. The findings underscore the pressing need for reforms aimed at addressing socioeconomic disparities in sentencing to ensure fairness and equity in the administration of justice.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social conflict theory, labeling theory and intersectionality theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the judicial sentencing disparities: a study of the influence of socioeconomic status in Ethiopia. Provide ongoing training for judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and other legal stakeholders on recognizing and mitigating implicit biases related to SES. Review and reform sentencing guidelines to minimize the influence of socioeconomic factors on sentencing outcomes.
Downloads
References
Brazilian Bar Association. (2020). Sentencing disparities and reform initiatives: 2010-2020. Retrieved from https://www.oab.org.br/
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. (2021). Crime statistics: 2010-2020. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4437818
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2021). Drug Offenders in Federal Prison: Estimates of Characteristics Based on Linked Data. DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR30568.v5
Crenshaw, K. (2019). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140(1), 139-167.
Dahrendorf, R. (2018). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Routledge.
Egyptian Ministry of Justice. (2020). Sentencing trends and reform initiatives: 2010-2020. Retrieved from https://www.moj.gov.eg/
Garcia, M. H., & Nguyen, T. K. (2020). Rural-urban disparities in judicial sentencing: A comparative analysis. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 235-245.
Indonesian Ministry of Justice and Human Rights. (2020). Sentencing trends and reforms: 2010-2020. Retrieved from https://www.kemenkumham.go.id/
Kenyan Judiciary. (2021). Annual Report: 2020-2021. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23023.92324
King, R. D., & Light, M. T. (2019). The sentencing consequences of higher education: The case of foreign-born offenders. Social Science Research, 83, 102322. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102322
Lee, S. H., & Kim, J. (2018). Race, socioeconomic status, and judicial sentencing disparities: A mixed-methods study. Law and Society Review, 52(2), 265-293.
Lemert, E. M. (2021). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. Routledge.
Mexican Government. (2020). Drug-related offenses and sentencing trends: 2010-2020. Retrieved from https://www.gob.mx/segob/acciones-y-programas/estadisticas-de-justicia-penal-federal
Ministry of Justice. (2021). Sexual offences in England and Wales: year ending March 2020. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sexual-offences-in-england-and-wales-year-ending-march-2020
Morales, M., & Santiago, R. (2020). Bridging Borders: A Comparative Analysis of Socioeconomic Status and Sentencing Disparities across Nations. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 38(4), 567-586.
National Crime Records Bureau. (2021). Crime in India: 2010-2020. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25536.51209
Nigerian Prisons Service. (2021). Annual Report: 2019-2020. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15914.49605
Patel, S., & Gupta, A. (2021). Beyond the Gavel: Long-term Implications of Socioeconomic Status-based Sentencing Disparities. Criminology & Public Policy, 20(3), 321-339.
Perry, B., & Rubin, E. L. (2018). Socioeconomic status and punishment: A meta-analytic review and empirical test of popular theories. Law & Society Review, 52(4), 968-1005. DOI: 10.1111/lasr.12363
Rodriguez, J., Martinez, E., & Ramirez, L. (2022). Unveiling the Intersectionality of Socioeconomic Status and Sentencing: Lived Experiences in the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 38(1), 45-63.
Smith, A. B., Jones, C. D., Brown, E. R., & Patel, R. K. (2018). Socioeconomic status and federal sentencing outcomes: An empirical analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 45-56.
South African Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services. (2020). Annual Report 2019/2020. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34495.97443
Supreme Court of Pakistan. (2021). Annual Report: 2020. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28867.57129
Wang, Y., & Johnson, K. (2019). Socioeconomic status and sentencing disparities: A systematic review. Criminal Justice Review, 44(3), 251-267.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jamal Sadat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
