Impact of Intellectual Property Laws on Innovation in the Technology Sector in Netherlands

Authors

  • Jacob Cuyper Leiden University - Leiden Law School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1999

Keywords:

: Intellectual Property, Laws, Innovation, Technology Sector

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of intellectual property laws on innovation in the technology sector in Netherlands.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: strong IP protections can incentivize innovation by providing legal safeguards and enabling companies to monetize their inventions. This encourages investment in research and development (R&D) and promotes the creation of new technologies.

 

However, some studies indicate that overly restrictive IP laws may stifle innovation, particularly in sectors where rapid technological advancement is crucial. Excessive patent litigation and lengthy patent approval processes can create barriers to entry for smaller firms and startups, limiting competition and hindering innovation. Additionally, overly broad patents may discourage collaboration and hinder the development of complementary technologies.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Innovation economics theory, transaction cost economics and resource-based view of the firm may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of intellectual property laws on innovation in the technology sector in Netherlands. Technology firms should adopt proactive strategies to navigate the complexities of IP laws while fostering a culture of innovation within their organizations. Policymakers should strive to design IP laws that strike an optimal balance between incentivizing innovation and promoting knowledge dissemination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work. NBER Working Paper No. 24196. DOI: 10.3386/w24196

Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2019). Mobile Money and Financial Inclusion: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. The World Bank Economic Review, 33(3), 489-508. DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhw041

Barney, J. B. (2018). Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-Year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View. Journal of Management, 44(1), 235-251. DOI: 10.1177/0149206317734339

Belingheri, P., & Peres, W. (2020). Technological Innovation and Economic Development in Argentina: Recent Trends and Policy Implications. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3), 217-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2020.01.002

Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2018). Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press.

Boldrin, M., & Levine, D. K. (2018). Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press.

Chen, T. (2020). Intellectual Property Laws and Innovation in the Semiconductor Industry: A Case Study Approach. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(9), 741-752. DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpaa067

Choudhury, P., & Sabnavis, M. (2020). The Rise of Indian Start-ups: Technology Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Policy Environment. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 304-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2020.03.007

Da Silva, D. P., Albuquerque, E. M., & Coutinho, M. B. (2021). Innovation Policies in Brazil: An Analysis of Institutional Changes and Strategic Paths. Research Policy, 50(2), 104123. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104123

Effendi, Y., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2022). Technological Innovation and Economic Growth in Indonesia: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Asian Economics, 79, 101374. DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101374

Garcia, M. (2021). Changes in Intellectual Property Laws and Innovation in the Biotechnology Sector: A Longitudinal Analysis. Research Policy, 50(1), 104096. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104096

Huang, X., & Tang, S. (2020). The Innovation Ecosystem in China: A Case Study of Artificial Intelligence. Technovation, 90-91, 102088. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102088

Jones, S. (2018). Intellectual Property Laws and Innovation in the Open-Source Software Community: A Qualitative Study. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 421-438. DOI: 10.1287/isre.2018.0793

Kim, J. (2018). The Impact of Intellectual Property Laws on Innovation Performance: A Cross-Country Comparison. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 159-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.020

Liu, Y. (2022). The Influence of Intellectual Property Laws on Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Business Research, 144, 507-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.002

López, J., & Ramírez, J. (2020). Science, Technology and Innovation Policy in Mexico: Review and Prospects. Science and Public Policy, 47(4), 571-582. DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scaa011

Maharaj, M., Dlodlo, N., & Nhamo, G. (2021). Technological Innovation and Economic Growth in South Africa: A Review of Recent Trends and Policy Implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120841. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120841

Maskus, K. E. (2019). Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in Developing Countries: Evidence from Cross-Country Data. World Development, 122, 209-223. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.008

Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, T. H., & Le, T. T. (2022). Technological Innovation and Economic Growth in Vietnam: An Empirical Investigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121194. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121194

Okazaki, T., & Sawada, Y. (2021). Public-Private Partnerships and Innovation: Evidence from Japan's Regional Innovation Policy. World Development, 140, 105332. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105332

Olayide, O. E., & Adebowale, O. A. (2019). Entrepreneurial Innovation and Economic Development in Nigeria: The Role of Intellectual Property Rights. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 16(1), 1950010. DOI: 10.1142/S0219877019500103

Schumpeter, J. A. (2018). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Taylor & Francis.

Shapiro, C. (2018). The Economics of Intellectual Property: A Review to Identify Themes for Future Research. The University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 903-914. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3255479

Smith, A. (2019). Intellectual Property Laws and Innovation in the Software Industry: A Quantitative Analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(4), 1177-1202. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2019.1662075

Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). Intellectual Property Rights, the Pool of Knowledge, and Innovation. In L. B. Christensen & R. Martin-Nielsen (Eds.), Intellectual Property and Innovation Policies: Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries (pp. 27-45). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Wang, L. (2019). Intellectual Property Laws and Innovation Strategies among Technology Startups: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(4), 746-770. DOI: 10.1177/1042258718806454

Williamson, O. E. (2019). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. The Free Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-04

How to Cite

Cuyper, J. . (2024). Impact of Intellectual Property Laws on Innovation in the Technology Sector in Netherlands. American Journal of Law, 6(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1999

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Vol 6 No 1 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Jacob Cuyper

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.