The Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Combining Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir in Viral Hepatitis C Hemodialysis in Pakistani Population.

Authors

  • Shad Muhammad
  • Muhammad Ikram
  • Ahmad Zeb Khan
  • Ibrar Ahmed
  • Zia Ur Rehman
  • Salma Ghulam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.1079
Abstract views: 107
PDF downloads: 114

Keywords:

Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, MHD, Chronic, Hepatitis C, Hemodialysis, Pakistani population

Abstract

Purpose: The study objectives were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF and VLP combination in HCV-infected patients on Hemodialysis (HD) in the local community as usual Pakistani practice.

Methodology: In this study, 252 patients were given treatment who participated. Patients who maintain their hemodialysis are often given a combination of SOF and VLP. Before beginning the drug, the patient had testing that included an upper GI endoscopy, genotyping, measurement of the viral load, and a liver brow scan. Patients were administered SOF and VLP at dosages of 400 mg/day and 100 mg/day, respectively, for the duration of the study. Between March 2019 and March 2021, this study was conducted at the Department of Kidney Diseases at LRH Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan, which was an observational, prospective, single-center study. 27 HCV-HD patients were on a SOF/VLP regimen during the experiment. The ICH-GCP criteria were surveyed in an intended manner. During the data analysis, a p-value of 0.05 or below was considered statistically significant.

Results:  Forty percent ofthe patients were male, and sixtypercent were female between the ages of 27 and ninety. According to the findings of 252 participants (n = female 14, 43.5 percent and n = male 18, 45.5 percent), 21 subjects were naïve, and six issues were in the treatment-experienced group (with SOF/RBV), with a mean age of 35.5 years and a standard deviation of 9.6 years. At the post-treatment follow-up visit after 12 weeks of therapy with SOF/VLP, the sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 100 percent (252 of 252), indicating that all of the patients had successfully recovered from their infection. During the study, not a single patient had a virological setback or was lost to follow-up. The most common adverse effects (AEs) recorded were nausea, headache, and tiredness; however, there were no reports of significant AEs. In addition, there were no cases of therapy being stopped prematurely owing to adverse effects.

Conclusion: Patients in regular care in Pakistan who have HCV and are receiving HD are offered an extraordinarily efficient, risk-free, and well-tolerated treatment consisting of the total dosage of SOF-VLP given for 12 weeks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Shad Muhammad

Assistant Professor, Department of Nephrology, MTI, LRH Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Muhammad Ikram

Assistant Professor, Department of Nephrology, MTI, LRH Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Ahmad Zeb Khan

Assistant Professor, Department of Nephrology, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Ibrar Ahmed

Assistant Professor, Department of Endocrine and Diabetes, MTI, LRH Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Zia Ur Rehman

Trainee Medical Officer, LRH Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Salma Ghulam

Trainee Medical Officer, LRH Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan.

References

World Health Organization. Global hepatitis report 2017. World Health Organization; 2017. Retrieved from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255016/9789? sequence=1

Kanwal F, Kramer JR, Ilyas J, Duan Z, El‐ Serag HB. HCV genotype three is associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer in a national US Veterans with HCV sample. Hepatology. 2014; 60(1):98-105.

Chen YC, Lin HY, Li CY, Lee MS, Su YC. A nationwide cohort study suggests that hepatitis C virus infection is associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2014; 85(5):1200-1207.

Yamabe H, Johnson RJ, Gretch DR, Fukushi K, Osawa H, Miyata M, Inuma H, Sasaki T, Kaizuka M, Tamura N. Hepatitis C virus infection membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in Japan. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995; 6(2):220-223.

Perico N, Cattaneo D, Bikbov B, Remuzzi G. Hepatitis C infection and chronic renal diseases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(1):207-220.

Chen SL, Morgan TR. The natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2006; 3(2):47-52.

Sivapalasingam S, Malak SF, Sullivan JF, Lorch J, Sepkowitz KA. High prevalence of hepatitis C infection among patients35

We are receiving hemodialysis at an urban dialysis center. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2002;23(6):319-324.

Okoh EJ, Bucci JR, Simon JF, Harrison SA. HCV in patients with end-stage renal disease Am J Gastroenterol, 103 (2008), pp. 2123- 2134

Goodkin DA, Bieber B, Jadoul M, Martin P, Kanda E, Pisoni RL. Mortality, hospitalization, and quality of life among patients with hepatitis C infection on hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2017; 12(2):287-297.

Shafiq F, Akram S, Hashmat N. Prevalence of hepatitisCinpatientswiththe end-stage renal disease beforeand during hemodialysis. Pak J Gastroenterol. 2002; 16(1):17-20.

Khokhar N, Alam AY, Naz F, Mahmud SN. Risk factors for hepatitis C virus infectionin patients on long-term hemodialysis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005;15(6):326-328.

Khan S, Attaullah S, Ali I, Ayaz S, KhanSN, SirajS,KhanJ.RisingburdenofHepatitisC Virus in hemodialysis patients. Virology J. 2011;8(1):438.

Wheeler DC, Winkelmayer WC. KDIGO 2018 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention, Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Hepatitis C in ChronicKidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2018; 8(3):91- 165.

Berenguer M. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients. Hepatology. 2008; 48 (5): 1690-1699.

Etik DO, Ocala S, Boyacioglu AS. Hepatitis C infection in hemodialysis patients: A review. World J Hepatol. 2015; 7(6):885- 895.

Pockros PJ, Reddy KR, Mantry PS, Cohen E, Bennett M, Sulkowski MS, Bernstein DE, Cohen DE, Shulman NS, Wang D, Khatri A. Efficacy of direct-acting antiviral combination for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype one infection and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease. Gastroenterology. 2016; 150(7):1590-1598.

Bagnis CI, Cacoub P. Hepatitis C Therapy in Renal Patients: Who, How, When?. Infect Dis Ther. 2016; 5(3):313-327.

Port, F.K., Morgenstern, H., Bieber, B.A., Karaboyas, A., McCullough, K.P., Tentori, F., Pisoni, R.L., and Robinson, B.M., 2017. Understanding associations of hemodialysis practices with clinical and patient-reported outcomes: examples from the DOPPS. Nephrol DialTransplant.2017; 32(suppl_2):106-112.

Ampuero J, Reddy KR, Romero-Gomez M. Hepatitis C virus genotype 3: Meta-analysis on sustained virologic response rates with currently available treatment options. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016;22(22):5285-5292.

Suwanthawornkul, T., Anothaisintawee, T., Sobhonslidsuk, A., Thakkinstian, A., and Teerawattananon, Y., 2015. Efficacy of second-generation direct-acting antiviral agents for treatment naïve hepatitis C genotype 1: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PloS one, 10(12), p.e0145953.

Umer M, Iqbal M. Hepatitis C virus prevalence and genotype distribution in Pakistan: Comprehensive review of recent data. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(4):1684-1700.

Khan, R. A., Ali, A., & Khan, A. Y. Effectiveness of Sofosbuvir regime in Hepatitis C virus infection in Pakistani hemodialysis patients: Single Centre Study. Int J Endorsing Health Sci Res. 2017; 5(4), 28- 32.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-23

How to Cite

Muhammad, S. ., Ikram, M. ., Khan, A. Z. ., Ahmed, I. ., Rehman, Z. U. ., & Ghulam, S. . (2022). The Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Combining Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir in Viral Hepatitis C Hemodialysis in Pakistani Population. American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice, 7(8), 40 - 48. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.1079