NGONG FOREST DEPENDENCE AND HOUSEHOLD WELFARE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajes.256Keywords:
Forest Income, Quintiles, Forest Resources, Household IncomeAbstract
Purpose: This study attempted to examine the economic contribution made by Ngong forest to rural households that surround it.
Methodology: The study area that the sample was drawn from was the Kibiko Holding Ground with a population of 1,025 and 199 households. The study population was 199 households as households were the study unit. A sample size of 55 households was identified through systematic random sampling.
Results: indicated that the forest resources that are mostly extracted by the households are firewood, followed by honey, poles, vegetables and finally medicinal herbs. Study results also revealed that only the count of livestock and the quintile income mattered in the extraction of forest resources. The rest of the socioeconomic factors (gender, literacy, years of education, age, family size, family composition, sickness shocks) did not matter for forest resource extraction.
Conclusion and Recommendation: The study concluded that poorer households are more resource dependent than the rich. In addition, forest income contributes significantly towards household welfare. Hence, an effort to balance between environmental concerns and sustainable livelihoods should ensure that families living in the area are paid an equivalent KES 5,309 per month to alleviate their suffering in case they were to be translocated to other non forest areas.
Downloads
References
Angelsen, A., and Wunder, S. (2003). “Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications” CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 40, Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
Campbell, B. Mandando, N., Nemarundwe, W., Jong, M., Luckret, and Matose, F., (2001). “Challenges to proponents of common property resource systems: despairing voices from the social forests of Zimbabwe”, World Development 29: 589-600.
Campbell, B., Clarke, J., Luckert, M., Matose, F., Musvoto, C. and Scoones, I. (1994). Local level economic valuation of savanna woodland resources: village cases from Zimbabwe. Mimeo, University of Zimbabwe, Harare.
Cavendish, W. (2000). “Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: Evidence from Zimbabwe”. World Development, 28, 1979–2003.
Dasgupta, P. (1993). An inquiry into well-being and destitution. Clarendon Press, Oxford. DFID (1999). Access to Natural Resources Sub-Programme, Working Paper 33
Emerton L. (1999). Mount Kenya: The Economics of Community Conservation. Discussion Paper No.4.
FAO (2000). Forest Resources of Bangladesh, Country Report. Working Paper 15. Rome, Italy.
FAO. (1997). Issues and opportunities in the evolution of private forestry and forestry extension in several countries with economies in transition in Central and Eastern Europe. FAO publication W7170/E, Rome.
Fisher, M. (2004). “Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi” Journal of Environment and Development Economics 9: 135-154
Fonta W., Ichoku, E.H. and Ogujiuba, K.K. (2010). Forest Extraction Income, Poverty and Inequality. CEEPA, Discussion Paper. No. 48, CEEPA, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Godoy, R. and Bawa, K.S. (1993). “The economic value and sustainable harvest of plants from the tropical forest: assumptions, hypotheses and methods”. Economic Botany 47(3), 215-19.
Hegde, R. and Bull, G. (2005). Economic Shocks and Miombo Woodland Resource Use: A Household Level study in Mozambique. Dept. of Forest Resource Management, University of British Columbia.
Kabubo-Mariara, J (2008). “Forest dependence and household welfare: empirical evidence from Kenya” CEEPA Discussion Paper No 41, Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa, University of Pretoria.
Kaimowitz, D. (2003). Forest law enforcement and rural livelihoods. International Forestry Review 5(3).
Pattanayak, S. and Sills. E., (2004). Economics of Tropical Deforestation. Economics, Acada Books
Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Berg, G.K., and Sjaastad, E. (2004). Counting on the Environment. Forest Incomes and the Rural Poor: A study for the World Bank. Paper no. 98. Environment Development Papers. The World Bank, Washington D.C., USA. World Bank 1996 Understanding poverty and human resources in Zimbabwe.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
