CONTRIBUTION OF JGI REDD+PROJECT IN ADDRESSING DEFORESTATION, CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND PEOPLE'S LIVELIHOODS IN WESTERN TANZANIA: A CASE OF ILAGALA, KARAGO AND KIRANDO VILLAGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajes.233Keywords:
REDD , deforestation, climate variability, livelihoods, poverty alleviationAbstract
Purpose: The study examined the contribution of REDD+ in addressing deforestation, climate variability and people's livelihoods in three villages of Ilagala, Karago and Kirando, within the REDD+ Masito-Ugalla ecosystem in Uvinza District, Tanzania.
Methodology: The methods used were household interviews, semi-structured interview, focus group discussions, field observations, analysis of meteorological data, as well as remote sensing and geographical information systems (GIS). A total of 101 households were randomly selected for the study.
Results: The trend of the mean annual rainfall and rainfall deviations from the annual mean revealed the presence of climate variability. Majority of the respondents agreed that climate variability was happening in their area. Deforestation and forest degradation were also a problem in the area as evidenced by expansion of cultivation at the expense of other vegetation types and opening up of the closed woodlands. The findings further revealed that majority of respondents were aware about REDD+ objectives and that the project had provided conservation education to local communities and supported them to alleviate poverty through establishing entrepreneurship groups within the project area, each group dealing with a specific activity, including beekeeping and poultry. Majority of the respondents said they were able to support the education needs of their children as benefits accrued to them during REDD+ operation. The contribution of REDD+ project in minimizing deforestation, climate variability and improving people's livelihoods was manifested through training of forest monitors and fire breakers and establishment of community projects. The REDD+ performance, however, was reported to be on average. Also due to its short operation period, REDD+ did not significantly contribute to people's livelihoods.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: This study has provided important lessons on the importance and opportunities offered by REDD+ in addressing forest
conservation and providing livelihood benefits to the local communities. Although REDD+ policies and projects are geared towards addressing climate change mitigation, if well designed, they can go a long way in alleviating poverty while at the same time conserving the forests. What is required is for nations to identify what the needs of the local communities and the desired benefits in the respective areas are and build into the REDD+ projects strategies that would adequately address those needs and provide the required benefits.
Downloads
References
Angelsen, A., Brown, S., Loisel, C., Peskett, L., Streck, C. & Zarin, D. (2009). Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): An Options Assessment Report. http://www.REDD-OAR.org
Bolton, R. N. (1993). "Pretesting Questionnaires: Content Analyses of Respondents' Concurrent Verbal Protocols," Marketing Science, 12 (3), 280-303.
Climate Care (2015). Kasigau REDD+ Project Creating jobs and Protecting Habitats.
http://climatecare.org/our-projects/kasigau-redd/
Deloitte (2012). Mid-term Review Report of Nine NGO REDD+ Pilot Projects in Tanzania. http://www.norway.go.tz/
Energy & Resources Institute (2009). India's Fourth National Report to Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.teriin.org/projects/nfa/
GAO (1989). Content Analysis: A Methodology for Structuring and Analyzing Written
Material. United States. http://archive.gao.gov/d48t13/138426.pdf
Hvalkof, S. (2013). Imperatives for REDD+ Sustainability: Non-Carbon Benefits, Local and Indigenous Peoples. http://www.iwgia.org/iwgia_files...pdf.
Indufor (2014). End Review of the JGI REDD+Pilot Project-Final Report.
http://www.norway.go.tz/PageFiles/.../pdf
JGI (2013). Building REDD readiness in the Masito-Ugalla Ecosystem Pilot Area in Support of Tanzania's National REDD Strategy. http://www.reddtz.org/?wpfb
JGI (2010). JGI's REDD Program: Carbon, Communities and Chimps. http://www.janegoodall.org/REDD
Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.Volume 24, Cornell University.
Kajembe, G.C., Silayo, D.S.A., Mwakalobo, A.B.S. & Mutabazi, K. (2013). The Kilosa District REDD+ Pilot Project, Tanzania: A Socio-economic Baseline Survey. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London.
Lawlor, K., Madeira, M. E., Blockhus, J. & Ganz, J. D. (2013). Community Participation and Benefits in REDD+: A Review of Initial Outcomes and Lessons. Forests 2013, 4, 296-318; doi:10.3390/f4020296.
Makunga, J. E. & Misana, S. B. (2017). The Extent of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Masito-Ugalla Ecosystem, Kigoma Region, Tanzania. Open Journal of Forestry (In Press)
Monroe College (2011). Exploratory,Descriptive,and Causal Research Designs. http://www.monroecollege.edu/academicresources/ebooks
Mori, H. (2013). A Review of Selected REDD+ Project Designs.
http://www.conservationgateway.org/sites/defaults/
Moyer, D., Plumptre, A. J., Pintea, L., Hernandez-Aguilar, A., Moore, J., Stewart, F., Davenport, T. R. B., Piel, A., Kamenya, S., Mugabe, H., Mpunga, N. & Mwangoka, M. (2006). Surveys of Chimpanzees and Other Biodiversity in Western Tanzania. http://pages.ucsd.edu/
Mulhall, A. (2003). Methodological Issues in Nursing Research in the Field: Notes on Observation in Qualitative Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41(3), 306- 313.
NORDECO (2013). National REDD+ Strategy Development and Implementation Process in Tanzania: Mid Term Review, Final Report. http://www.norway.go.tz/.../
Peskett, L. (2010). Benefit Sharing in REDD+: Exploring the Implications for Poor and Vulnerable People. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/
Piel, A., Kamenya, S., Mugabe, H., Mpunga, N. & Mwangoka, M. (2006). Surveys of Chimpanzees and Other Biodiversity in Western Tanzania. http://pages.ucsd.edu/
REDD+ Costa Rica (2015). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). http://reddcr.go.cr/en/
REDD Desk (2014). Building REDD Readiness in the Masito-Ugalla Ecosystem Pilot Area in Western Tanzania in Support of Tanzania National REDD Strategy.
http://theredddesk.org/countries/initiatives/
Smith, S. M. (2013). Determining Sample Size: How to Ensure You Get the Correct Sample Size. http://success.qualtrics.com/pdf
Springate-Baginski, O. & Wollenberg, E. (eds.) (2010). REDD Forest Governance and Rural Livelihoods: The Emerging Agenda. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. http://www.cifor.org/publications/
Stewart (2006). Analyzing Focus Group Data. http://www.sagepub.com/upm-data/pdf
Svoboda, D. & McNamara, M. (2009). USDA Forest Service Technical Assistance Trip Watershed Assessment of the Masito-Ugalla Landscape, July 4th-20th, 2009.
http://rmportal.net/library/content/usda-forest/
Terre, A. L. (2013). REDD+ in Madagascar: You Can't See the Wood for the Carbon. http://www.amisdelaterre.org/IMG/pdf/
TNRF (2011). REDD Realities:Learningfrom REDD Pilot Projects to make REDD Work. http://www.tnrf.org/
UNEP (2015). Benefits of Forest Ecosystems in Zambia and the Role of REDD+ in a Green Economy Transformation. http://www.unredd.org/...asx
UNEP (2014). Supporting Planning for Multiple Benefits from REDD+ in Uganda Exploring Synergies with the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
UN REDD Programme (2010). The UN-REDD Programme Strategy 2011- 2015. 5th meeting, 4-5 November 2010. http://www.unep.org/forests/.../UN-REDD
URT (2013). National Strategy for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). Vice President's Office, Feb. 2013.
URT (2008). Piloting REDD in Tanzania. http://www.theredddesk.org/sites/default/files/
URT (1989). Tanzania Forestry Action Plan 1990/91-2007/08. Dar es Salaam.
Wildlife Works (2008). The Kasigau Corridor REDD Project Phase I - Rukinga Sanctuary. http://www.wildlifeworks.com/redd/
Word Press (2014). Sample Size in Statistics: How to Find it. Available at:
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.