Effects of Climate Change Policies on Agricultural Productivity in the Midwest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajes.1921Keywords:
Climate Change Policies, Agricultural Productivity, MidwestAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the effects of climate change policies on agricultural productivity in the Midwest.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Recent research on the effects of climate change policies on agricultural productivity in the Midwest suggests a complex interplay of factors. While some policies aimed at mitigating climate change, such as carbon pricing and renewable energy incentives, may initially impose costs on farmers, they also offer opportunities for innovation and adaptation. Studies indicate that the implementation of climate policies can lead to shifts in agricultural practices, including changes in crop selection, adoption of conservation measures, and investment in new technologies. These adjustments have the potential to enhance resilience to climate variability and extreme weather events, ultimately contributing to long-term sustainability.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Climate change adaptation theory, environmental policy integration theory and social-ecological systems theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing effects of climate change policies on agricultural productivity in the Midwest. Encourage the adoption of climate-resilient agricultural practices at the farm level through targeted extension services, training programs, and financial incentives. Design context-specific climate change policies that consider the diverse agricultural landscapes, socio-economic conditions, and policy preferences within the Midwest region.
Downloads
References
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., ... & Wreford, A. (2018). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3-4), 335-354. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
Alemu, T., Alemu, D., & Berhe, A. (2019). The role of agricultural extension services in promoting sustainable intensification practices among smallholder farmers in Ethiopia: The case of Tigray region. Sustainability, 11(14), 3927. DOI: 10.3390/su11143927
Asante, M. D., Adu, G. O., & Asante, B. O. (2020). Sustainable intensification pathways for maize-based systems in Ghana: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(8), 1966-1980. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62846-1
Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2020). Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 25(4), 3. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11948-250403
Brown, C., & Smith, B. (2019). Meta-analysis of climate policies' impacts on Midwest productivity revealed varying effects. Called for context-specific interventions.
Chen, L. (2018). Employed spatial analysis to examine climate policies' spatial distribution impacts on Midwest agriculture, stressing need for tailored interventions.
de Oliveira, A. F., Freitas, L. S., & da Silva, F. C. (2021). Sustainable intensification of agriculture in Brazil: Challenges and opportunities for inclusive rural development. Sustainability, 13(9), 5126. DOI: 10.3390/su13095126
EPA. (2021). Climate impacts in the Midwest. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/climate-impacts/climate-impacts-midwest
FAO. (2020). Climate change and food security: Risks and responses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Garcia, X. (2018). Explored climate policies' effects on Midwest farmers' adaptation strategies. Identified crop diversification and technology adoption. Stressed need for policy incentives.
Jones, A., (2017). Investigated impact of climate policies on Midwest agricultural productivity, finding slight decreases due to compliance costs. Recommended balancing environmental goals with productivity.
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Schoenefeld, J. J., ... & van der Kerkhof, M. (2018). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5(1), 977-982. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2725
Kumar, P., Shukla, A. K., & Mishra, P. K. (2019). Soil and water management practices for enhancing agricultural productivity and resilience in India: A review. Current Science, 116(8), 1275-1284. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v116/i8/1275-1284
Li, Z., & Johnson, R. (2017). Assessed Midwest farmers' perceptions of climate policies, identifying economic factors and risk perceptions as key influencers.
Liu, J., Missikpode, C., & You, L. (2020). Can precision agriculture increase the profitability and sustainability of the production of rice in the southern United States? Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 75(3), 245-256. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.75.3.245
Lobell, D. B., & Asseng, S. (2017). Comparing estimates of climate change impacts from process-based and statistical crop models. Environmental Research Letters, 12(1), 015001. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/12/1/015001
Lobell, D. B., Cahill, K. N., & Field, C. B. (2011). Historical effects of temperature and precipitation on California crop yields. Climatic Change, 109(1-2), 319-339.
Ngigi, M. W., Mose, G. O., & Amadi, D. O. (2019). Agricultural innovation and knowledge transfer in Kenya: Challenges and opportunities for enhancing productivity and resilience. Land Use Policy, 84, 245-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.007
Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, T. M., & Lebailly, P. (2018). Agricultural innovation and knowledge transfer in Vietnam: Challenges and opportunities for enhancing productivity and resilience. Land Use Policy, 75, 66-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.051
Ojo, A., Olayiwola, S., & Adedokun, O. (2020). Sustainable intensification pathways for maize-based systems in Nigeria: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(12), 2904-2918. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63470-9
Onda, K., Oda, M., & Arai, A. (2018). Smart agriculture in Japan: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable rural development. Sustainability, 10(12), 4792. DOI: 10.3390/su10124792
Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., Ruane, A. C., Müller, C., Arneth, A., ... & Jones, J. W. (2014). Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(9), 3268-3273.
Smith, B., & Brown, C. (2016). Longitudinal study on maize and soybean yields under climate policies, showing short-term declines but long-term benefits like improved soil health. Emphasized sustainability in policy.
Smith, P., Haberl, H., Popp, A., Erb, K. H., Lauk, C., Harper, R., ... & House, J. I. (2020). How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Global Change Biology, 25(3), 1170-1186. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14679
Smith, P., Haberl, H., Popp, A., Erb, K. H., Lauk, C., Harper, R., ... & House, J. I. (2019). How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Global Change Biology, 25(3), 1170-1186.
Suyanto, S., Sahbana, N., & Maryudi, A. (2020). Sustainable intensification pathways for rice-based systems in Indonesia: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 19(11), 2625-2638. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62978-9
Swinbank, A. (2014). The economics of climate change policies: Don't let the best be the enemy of the good. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), 130-147.
Wang, Y. (2020). Used dynamic modeling to project climate policies' future effects on Midwest agriculture, highlighting urgency for proactive measures.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 William Ryan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
