The Anatomization of Learning Principles Administration in Secondary School Teaching

Authors

  • Khadija Muhammad Hussain Marvi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajep.1367

Keywords:

Background, environmental, influencing, acuteness, and self-regulated

Abstract

Purpose: The study analyzed the challenges teachers' face when teaching students. The biggest difficulty is developing the current topic while working with the pupils' prior concepts.

Methodology: A qualitative research methodology was used in this study. Group interviews were conducted with five teachers from each school making total of 15 teachers.

Findings: Discussion-based teaching methods may solve this problem but many schools do not use them due to limits imposed by school authorities. The lesson planner serves as the basis for the working environment in the classroom. The seven learning principles in teaching training are designed to grow the self-directed learner in a setting where people love learning and actively seek it out. However, most teachers do not engage in teaching and learning in their actions, and our educational systems do not gain any benefits from the skills of qualified teachers. The principle of learning results in self-directed learners, but it is not an action; rather, it is a set of skills and talents. Yet, they are constrained by imperceptible restrictions. Each institution has its own set of guidelines. Institutions frequently employ outdated teaching methods and lack modernization. Although students are frequently referred to as intellectuals, the conception of this study illustrates through  "Concept of Acuity" which is the combination of developmental and constructional theory states, under the direction of teachers, student can improve their talent and learning capacities by sharpening their focus, attentiveness, insights, and awareness.

Recommendation: Prior knowledge evaluation can be used to conduct cognitive collaborative learning in the classroom, giving students freedom of thinking and attention. Teacher feedback is necessary to deal with prior knowledge collaborative learning challenges.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Khadija Muhammad Hussain Marvi

Graduate Student, Bachelor of Education, Hamdard University Karachi, Pakistan

References

Alyssa, F. W. Ju-yo, C. Thomas, M. D. & Rodrigo, T. D. V. (2004). The Effects of Teacher Social Presence on Student Satisfaction, Engagement, and Learning. 31(3):247-271.

Brian, F. Natalie, S. & James, K. (2018). Formative feedback and scaffolding for developing complex problem solving and modelling outcomes, European Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 43. Issue. 4. Pp 552-568.

Boekaerts, M. Koning, E. De, and Vedder, P. H. (2006). Goal-Directed Behavior and contextual Factor in the classroom: an Innovative approach to the study to multiple goal, Educational Psychologist. Vol. 41. Issue. 1. Pp 33-51.

David, M. M. (2011). The American role in education in the Middle East: ideology and experiment, 1920-1940, Pedagogical Historica. Vol.47. Pp 1-2, 173-189.

DR. BADA, S. O. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm of Teaching and Learning. Vol. 5. Issue. 6. Pp 66-70.

Hannie, G. & Ton, D. J. (2005). The Relation between Prior Knowledge and Students' Collaborative discovery Learning Processes, Vol.42. Issue. 3. Pp 264-282.

Helen, J. Saskia, B. G. Henny, B. & Margje, V. D. W. (2010). The challenge of self"directed and self"regulated learning in vocational education: a theoretical analysis and synthesis of requirements, Journal of Vocational Education & Training. Vol. 62. Issue. 4. Pp 415-440.

Jeffrey, F. Nancy, S. (2008). Student-Centered Learning Addressing Faculty Questions about Student centered Learning. Vol. 30.Issue 11.

Jennifer, D. Robinson, Pharm, D. &Adam, M. (2020). American Journal of pharmaceutical education; Developing Self Directed Learners. Vol. 84. Issue 3. Article 847512.

Kendra, C. (2022). Background and Key Concepts of Piaget's Theory.

Kevin, L. Jacqueline, D. G. & Rhonda, H. (2007). Using goal-directed reflection to make reflection more meaningful. Vol. 74.

McCrindle, Andrea, R. & Christensen, Carol, A. (1995). The impact of leaning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Vol. 5.Issue.2. Pp 167-185.

Maria, R. Rayes, Marc, A. Brackett, Susan, E. Rivers, Mark, W. & Peter, S. (2012). Classroom Emotional Climate, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology. 10(3). Pp 700-712.

Michael, J. L., Stella, V., Penny, V. D. & Mirella, W., David, J. (2018). Teachers' and students' belief systems about the self -regulation of learning, Educational psychology review. Vol. 31. Pp 223-251.

HEC, (2012). Handout methods of teaching course guide.

Martin, H. (2006). Classroom management a proactive approach.

Sarah, J. Fletcher, Carol, A. Mullen, (2012). Mentoring and Coaching in Education. Sage, London.

Susan, A. Michael, W. Bridges, Michele, D. P. Marsha, C. Lovett, Marie, K. Norman, R. E. Mayer, (2010). How Learning Works, 7 Research-based principle for smart teaching. ISBN: 978-0-470-48410-4.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-10

How to Cite

Marvi, K. M. H. . (2023). The Anatomization of Learning Principles Administration in Secondary School Teaching. American Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajep.1367