Determining the Predictive Power of the Gravity Model: A Case for Zambia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/aje.2524Keywords:
Trade Flows, GDP, Gravity Model, ZambiaAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive power of the gravity model in explaining trade flows in Zambia.
Materials and Methods: The study utilized panel data for the period 1990-2020 for the Zambian economy and its 15 top trading partners based on 2018 trade volumes. The data was collected from the Centre for Prospective Studies and International Studies for International Information (CEPII) Gravity Database. The study employed the gravity equation to predict trade flows in Zambia.
Findings: The empirical results show that the gravity model accurately predicts Zambia's trade flows, with GDP positively and distance negatively correlated with exports. The results also show that sharing a common border enhances Zambia’s exports. Surprisingly, trade agreements exhibit a negative relationship with exports.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: The significant negative impact of distance on trade highlights the need for improved infrastructure and logistics to reduce transportation costs, thus, facilitating Zambia’s trade flows. Further, the findings suggest that Zambia should focus on strengthening trade with neighboring countries. Additionally, Zambia should diversify export bases away from heavy reliance on the mining sector. Besides, there is a need for active participation in regional integration initiatives to address implementation challenges of trade agreements.
Downloads
References
African Export-Import Bank (2023). Zambia: Country Brief. Cairo.
Bank of Zambia (2023). Annual Report 2023. Lusaka.
Bendjilali, B. (2000). An intra-trade econometric model for OIC member countries: a cross- country analysis. Islamic Research and Training Institute, Islamic Development Bank.
Brun, J. F., Carrère, C., Guillaumont, P., & De Melo, J. (2005). Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(1), 99-120.
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002). Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica, 70(5), 1741- 1779.
Eita, J. H., & Jordaan, A. C. (2007). South Africa’s Wood Export Potential Using a Gravity Model Approach. Department of Economics: University of Pretoria.
Feyrer, J. (2019). Trade and income—exploiting time series in geography. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 1-35.
Filippini, C., & Molini, V. (2003). The determinants of East Asian trade flows: a gravity equation approach. Journal of asian Economics, 14(5), 695-711.
Gunning, J. W. (2001). Trade blocs: relevant for Africa?. Journal of African Economies, 10(3), 311-335.
Haile, K., & Geda, A. (2006). Regional economic integration in Africa: A review of problems and prospects with a case study of COMESA. Journal of African Economies, 15(2), 272-307
Harvard’s Growth Lab (2024). The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Retrieved 2024-11-03 from https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/
Mijere, N. J. (2009). Informal cross-border trade in the Southern African Development Community (SADC).
Ministry of Finance (2023). Annual Economic Report. Lusaka.
Oguledo, V., & MacPhee, C. R. (1994). Gravity models: a reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements. Applied Economics, 26(2), 107-120.
Osabuohien, E. S., Efobi, U. R., Odebiyi, J. T., Fayomi, O. O., & Salami, A. O. (2019). Bilateral trade performance in West Africa: A gravity model estimation. African Development Review, 31(1), 1-14.
Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches archiv, 93-100.
Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. The Twentieth Century Fund.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2016). Sand in the Wheels: Non-Tariff Measures and Regional Integration in SADC Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities. Research Study Series No. 71.
World Bank (2023). Zambia-Country Economic Memorandum: Unlocking Productivity and Economic Transformation for Better Jobs (English). Washington, D.C.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gregory Phiri, Boyd Mwila Lumbwe, Chilizani Phiri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
