CONTRIBUTION OF FOREST RESOURCES TO HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND LEVEL OF DEPENDENCE BY DIFFERENT INCOME GROUPS

Authors

  • Dorothy K. Mwera University of Nairobi
  • Dr. Wilfred Nyangena Univeristy of Nairobi
  • Dr. Kamau Gathiaka Univeristy of Nairobi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/aje.131

Keywords:

Forest Income, Quintiles, Forest Resources, Household Income

Abstract

Purpose: To Quantify the contribution of forest resources to household income and level of dependence by different income groups (quintiles

Methodology: The study drew experiences from past studies and literature review. The study area that the sample was drawn from was the Kibiko Holding Ground with a population of 1,025 and 199 households. The study population was 199 households as households were the study unit. A sample size of 55 households was identified through systematic random sampling. 

Results: Results indicated that the forest resources that are mostly extracted by the households are firewood, followed by honey, poles, vegetables and finally medicinal herbs. Study results also revealed that only the count of livestock and the quintile income mattered in the extraction of forest resources.

Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: There needs to be a policy on livestock use of forests as an increase in livestock resources leads to an increase in forest use extraction.  Consideration needs to be given to those households with livestock since an eviction would mean their livestock will be highly affected and of course in a negative way. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dorothy K. Mwera, University of Nairobi

Post graduate student

Dr. Wilfred Nyangena, Univeristy of Nairobi

Lecturer, Univeristy of Nairobi

Dr. Kamau Gathiaka, Univeristy of Nairobi

Lecturer, Univeristy of Nairobi

References

Campbell, B. Mandando, N., Nemarundwe, W., Jong, M., Luckret, & Matose, F., (2001). Challenges to proponents of common property resource systems: despairing voices from the social forests of Zimbabwe. World Development 29: 589-600.

Cavendish, W. (2000). Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: Evidence from Zimbabwe. World Development, 28, 1979-2003.

Dasgupta, P. (1993). An inquiry into well-being and destitution. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Kabubo-Mariara, J (2008). "Forest dependence and household welfare: empirical evidence from Kenya" CEEPA Discussion Paper No 41, Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa, University of Pretoria.

Kaimowitz, D. (2003). Forest law enforcement and rural livelihoods. International Forestry Review 5(3).

Trevor C (2001). "Interactions among actual ease - of - movement determinants and job satisfaction in prediction of voluntary turnover", Acad. Manage J. 44 (6): 621-638.

Upagade, V. & Shende, A. (2012). Research methodology. 2nd edition. S.Chad& Company Ltd. Ram Nagar, New Delhi

Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A., Berg, G.K., and Sjaastad, E. (2004). Counting on the Environment. Forest Incomes and the Rural Poor: A study for the World Bank. Paper no. 98. Environment Development Papers. The World Bank, Washington D.C., USA. World Bank 1996 Understanding poverty and human resources in Zimbabwe.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-12

How to Cite

Mwera, D. K., Nyangena, D. W., & Gathiaka, D. . K. (2017). CONTRIBUTION OF FOREST RESOURCES TO HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND LEVEL OF DEPENDENCE BY DIFFERENT INCOME GROUPS. American Journal of Economics, 1(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.47672/aje.131

Issue

Section

Articles