Sustainability Metrics in Software Development Practices in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajce.2250Keywords:
Sustainability, Metrics, Software, Development PracticesAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the sustainability metrics in software development practices in India.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: This study highlighted the integration of green coding practices, which focus on optimizing code to reduce energy usage and prolong the lifespan of hardware components. Additionally, lifecycle assessments are utilized to evaluate the long-term environmental effects of software products, from development through to disposal. Social sustainability metrics also play a role, addressing factors such as diversity in development teams and ethical considerations in software applications. Innovative approaches like DevOps practices contribute to sustainability by streamlining development processes and reducing resource wastage. Continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines are leveraged to automate testing and deployment, enhancing efficiency and reducing unnecessary computational overhead. The adoption of cloud computing is another notable trend, offering scalable resources that can be adjusted according to demand, thus optimizing energy use. Furthermore, sustainable software development often encompasses user-centric design principles that ensure software meets the needs of diverse populations, promoting inclusivity and accessibility. These comprehensive sustainability metrics collectively drive the movement towards more responsible and environmentally conscious software development practices.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Triple bottom line theory, systems thinking theory and resource-based view theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the sustainability metrics in software development practices in India. In terms of practical contributions, software development teams should prioritize the implementation of standardized sustainability metrics derived from research findings. On the policy front, it is recommended to advocate for regulatory support that incentivizes and supports sustainable software development practices.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. (2019). Green coding practices: A sustainable approach in software development. Journal of Sustainable Computing, Informatics and Systems, 24, 100345.
Amin, M. R., Rashid, M. N. A., & Shamsuddin, S. M. (2021). Sustainable hosting solutions for software applications: A review. Sustainability, 13(9), 5053.
Apple. (2021). Apple commits to be 100 percent carbon neutral for its supply chain and products by 2030. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2020/07/apple-commits-to-be-100-percent-carbon-neutral-for-its-supply-chain-and-products-by-2030/
ASEAN. (2021). ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC) 2021-2025. https://asean.org/storage/2021/05/APAEC2021-2025-Final-Report.pdf
Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2022). Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2022. https://www.adb.org/publications/southeast-asia-energy-outlook-2022
Banco Mundial. (2021). Waste Generation in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/news/press-release/2021/09/28/waste-generation-in-latin-america-and-the-caribbean
Barney, J. B. (2018). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 25(3), 643-650.
Brown, A. (2020). Identifying sustainability metrics in software development. Journal of Sustainable Computing, Informatics and Systems, 30, 150-165.
Elkington, J. (2018). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. New Society Publishers.
Garcia, L. (2018). Sustainability metrics and software quality: A correlational study. International Journal of Software Engineering, 25(4), 450-465.
ISWA. (2021). Global E-Waste Statistics Partnership. https://globalewaste.org/
Jones, B. (2019). Impact of sustainable hosting solutions on carbon emissions. Sustainable Development Journal, 40(2), 220-235.
Kumar, A., & Kumar, S. (2020). Environmental impact of software and its mitigation measures. International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews, 9(2), 152-165.
Lee, C. (2022). Economic implications of sustainability metrics in software development. Journal of Business and Sustainability, 15(3), 310-325.
López, J. R. (2019). Digital transformation and environmental challenges in Latin America. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(2), 45-58.
Nguyen, D. (2023). Challenges in implementing sustainability metrics in agile environments. International Journal of Agile Development, 12(1), 80-95.
Nkengfack, H. M. (2020). Energy efficiency challenges and opportunities in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Energy Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability, 5(3), 287-301.
OECD. (2020). Digital Agenda for Latin America (eLAC2022). https://www.oecd.org/latin-america/digital-economy-programme/eLAC2022-Digital-Agenda-Latin-America.htm
Patel, S. (2021). Social impact assessment of sustainable software development. Journal of Social Responsibility in Technology, 18(2), 180-195.
Sakamura, K., & Tsukamoto, M. (2020). Integrating sustainability metrics in software development lifecycle. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(6), 527-537.
Senge, P. M. (2018). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Currency.
Shah, R. (2018). Energy consumption of software and digital services: The environmental footprint. Journal of Sustainable Computing, Informatics and Systems, 19, 215-223.
Smith, J. (2018). Effectiveness of green coding practices in reducing energy consumption. Green Computing Journal, 12(3), 280-295.
Statista. (2021). Data center electricity consumption worldwide. https://www.statista.com/statistics/243999/worldwide-data-center-electricity-use/
WEEE Forum. (2021). E-Waste in the UK: Facts and Figures. https://www.weeeforum.org/what-we-do/uk-e-waste-facts-figures/
World Bank. (2020). Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL). https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/energy/brief/sustainable-energy-for-all
World Bank. (2021). Africa Data Center Market - Investment Analysis and Growth Opportunities 2021-2026. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/07/21/africa-data-center-market-investment-analysis-and-growth-opportunities-2021-2026
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aditi Sharma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
