Influence of Language use in Comedic Movies on Attitudes towards Sexual Orientations of University Students in Kenya.

Authors

  • Francis Maina Mararo
  • Professor Hellen K. Mberia
  • Dr. Lillian K. Omoke

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.828

Keywords:

Language use, Comedies, Attitudes, Sexual Orientations

Abstract

Purpose: The intention of this research was to establish the influence of language use in Comedic movies on attitudes towards sexual orientations of University students in Kenya. Comedic movies explore and depict contentious topics among them sexual orientations such as lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgenders-LGBTs. Comedians often use sarcasm and stereotypes for comicality purposes. This research used social learning theory (SLT).

Methodology: Mixed methods research design that also used a convergent parallel mixed method model to get quantitative and qualitative data were used. The targeted population was University students from 7 main, chartered public and private Universities in Nairobi County. A sample size of 467 students was used. Multi-stage sampling of respondents was done using probability sampling techniques involving stratified sampling and simple random sampling. Additionally, a focus group discussions involving 30 FGDs participants were used. Further, content analysis using a comedic movie, Modern Family that contains sexual orientations contents was conducted. Data was then analyzed and presented using inferential statistics, descriptive, correlation, regression and ANOVA analysis.

Findings: The findings showed that comedic movies use laughter to introduce and eventually influence attitudes towards sexual orientations of University students in Kenya. Specifically, most of those sampled agreed that nowadays there are more comedic movies using positive language while describing sexual orientations. Relatedly, a majority of those sampled agreed that they have become more tolerant and accepting of sexual orientations/LGBTs after watching comedic movies containing sexual orientations. The findings also noted that there is a significant number of University students who openly admitted to be LGBTs.

Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Media has a role in influencing the youths' attitudes towards sexual orientations. Language use in comedic movies had a significant relationship with attitudes formed towards sexual orientations/LGBTs. This was also linked to the increased open and more positive debates and discussions of sexual orientations/LGBTs, their challenges, predicaments and rights in Kenya. Therefore, the language used in the comedic movies was noted to have a significant role in influencing the attitudes towards sexual orientations of the University students in Kenya.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Francis Maina Mararo

Ph.D. Student, Department of Media Technology and Applied Communication, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya.

 

Professor Hellen K. Mberia

Lecturer, Department of Media Technology and Applied Communication, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Kenya.

Dr. Lillian K. Omoke

Lecturer, Department of Humanities, University of Embu (UoEm), Kenya.

References

Anaeto, S. G., Onabajo. O. S., Osifeso, J, B. (2008). Theories And Models of Communication. Maryland, USA. African Renaissance Books Inc; 57-136

Asthana, H.S., & Bhushan, B. (2007). Statistics for Social Sciences with SPSS Application. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Ltd. 2007. Print.

Augustsson, E. M, (2011). Queer as Folk, Representation of Gay Vocabulary in Popular Culture. University of Gothenburg.

Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.

Baker, P. (2002). Polari - The Lost Language of Gay Men. New York: Routledge.

Barton, D. (2001, April 15). Sitcoms embrace Gays, but characters still stereotypes. Sacramento.com Television. Retrieved from http://entertainment. Sacramento.com/television/20010416_Gays.html.

Betsch, M. L. (2008). University Conference Focuses On "˜Gay Language'. Retrieved from http://www.cnsnews.com/node/5425

Billig, M., (2005). Laughter and Ridicule: toward a Social Critique of Humour. Sage, London

Bux, R. A. (n.d.). Sexual orientation and television. Retrieved from http://www.mbcnet.org/ETV/S/htmlS/sexualorient/sexualorient.htm

Cameron, Deborah & Kulick. (2006). The Language and Sexuality Reader. London: Routledge.

Campbell, O., Cleland, J., Collumbien, M., & Southwick K. (1999). Social Sciences Methods For Research On Reproductive Health. World Health organization, Geneva Switzerland.

Carroll, L., & Gilroy, P. J. (2002). Role of appearance and nonverbal behaviors in the perception of sexual orientation among lesbians and gay men. Psychological Reports, 91, 115-122. http://dx.doi. Org/10.2466/pr0.2002.91.1.115.

Chambers, S. (2009). The Queer Politics of Television. London and New York: I.B. Taurus.

Chelang'at, S., & Njoroge, C. (2012), An investigation into the impact of television portrayals urban youth, unpublished Masters thesis submitted at the University of Nairobi.

Cooper, E. (2003). Decoding Will and Grace: Mass audience reception of a popular network situation comedy. Sociological Perspectives, 46(4), 513-533.

Cresswell J.W. (2009a). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed Methods Approaches.3rd edition. London: sage Publications

Dirks, T. (2010). Main Film Genres. Retrieved from http://www.filmsite.org/genres.html

Douglas (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. Maynard, Guest Editor, University of Wisconsin, Madison Pp. 105-29.

Dow, B. (2001). Ellen, Television, and the Politics of Gay and Lesbian Visibility: Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol.10 (Issue.2) 123-140.

Dyer, R. (1993b). The Role of Stereotypes. The Matter of Images. Essays on Representation. London and New York: Routledge.

Dynel, M., (2017). But seriously: on conversational humour and (un)truthfulness. Lingua 197, 83-102.

Dynel, M., (2018). Irony, deception and humour: seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. In: Mouton Series in Pragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Epstein, R., & Friedman, J. (Producers/Writers). (1996). [Videocassette]. Tri-Star Home Video.

Fejes, F. (2000). Making a gay masculinity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17, 113116.

Fejes, F, Petrich, K. (1993). Invisibility, homophobia, and heterosexism: Lesbians, gays, and the media. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 10:396-422.

Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drug and rock "˜n' (4th ed.) London: Sage.

Fisher, A, D., Hill, J, D., Joel., W, G., Gruber., L, E., (2007). Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Content on Television: A Quantitative Analysis Across Two; 52(3-4): 167-188.

Fouts, G., & Inch, R. (2005). Homosexuality in TV situation comedies: Characters and verbal comments. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(1), 35-45.

Gairola, R. (2000). Will & Grace: Watching with ambivalence. PopMatters.com. Retrieved August 8, 2001 from http://www.popmatters.com/tv/reviews/w/will-and-grace.html.

Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. (1991, May 17). Images of Lesbians in television and motion pictures: Report to the Commission on the Status of Women of the city of Los Angeles. Los Angeles: Sylvia Rhue.

Gross, L. (1991), Out of the mainstream: Sexual minorities and the mass media. Journal of Homosexuality.;21:19-46. [PubMed: 1856468]

Gross, L. (1994), What is wrong with this picture? Lesbian women and gay men on television. In: Ringer, RJ.,editor. Queer words, queer images: Communication and construction of homosexuality. New York, NY: New York University Press;. P. 143-156.

Gross, L. (1996). Don't ask don't tell: Lesbian and Gay people in the media. In P. M. Lester (Ed.), Images that injure: Pictorial stereotypes in the media. (pp. 149-159).Westport, CT: Prager Publishers.

Gross, L. (2001). Up from invisibility: Lesbians, gay men, and the media in America. New York: Columbia University Press.

Gross, L. & Woods, J. D. (1999). Introduction: Being Gay in American media and society. In The Columbia reader: On Lesbians and Gay men in media, society, and politics. (pp. 297-301). New York: Columbia University Press.

Hantzis, D. M. & Lehr, V. (1994). Whose desire? Lesbian (non)sexuality and television's perception of hetero/sexism. In R. J. Ringer (Ed.), Queer words, queer images: Communication and the construction of homosexuality. (pp. 107-121). New York: New York University Press.

Hart, K. R. (2000). Representing Gay men on American television. The Journal of Men's Studies, 9(1) 59-79.

Herman, D. (2005). "I'm gay": Declarations, desire, and coming out on prime-time television. Sexualities, 8(1): 7-29.

Huston, A. C., Donnerstein, E., Fairchild, H., Feshbach, N. D., Katz, P. A., Murrany, J. P., et al. (1992). Summary and conclusion. Big world, small screen: The role of television in American society (pp. 130-146). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Jacobs, A. (1998, October 23). When gay men happen to straight women. Entertainment Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.ew.com.

Kielwasser, A. P.&Wolf, M. A. (1992). Mainstream television, adolescent homosexuality, and significant silence. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 9, 350-373.

Kunkel, D., Farinola, W.J., Cope-Farrar, K.M., Donnerstein, E., Biely, E., & Zwarun, L. (2002) Deciphering the V-Chip: An examination of the television industry's program rating judgment: Journal of Communication, 52 (1), 112-138.

McNair, Brian (2002) Striptease Culture: Sex, Media and the democratization of desire. London & New York: Routledge.

Moritz, M. J. (1994). Old strategies for new texts: How American television is creating and treating Lesbian characters. In R. J. Ringer (Ed.), Queer words, queer images: Communication and the construction of homosexuality. (pp. 122-141). New York: New York University Press.

Moritz, M. J. (1999). Old strategies for new texts: How American television is creating and treating Lesbian characters. In L. Gross and J. D. Woods (Eds.), The Columbia reader: On Lesbians and Gay men in media, society, and politics. (pp. 301-306).New York: Columbia University Press.

Nyabuga, G, Booker, N. (2013). Mapping digital Media: Kenya, a report by the open society foundations. London, Milbank.

Padva, G. (2007). Media and Popular Culture Representations of LGBT Bullying, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 19:3-4, 105-118, DOI: 10.1080/10538720802161615

Raley, A.B., & Lucas, J.L. (2006). Stereotype or success? Prime-time television's portrayals of gay male, lesbian, and bisexual characters. Journal of Homosexuality, 51(2), 19-38.

Rovella, M., Geringer, S. D., & Sanchez, R. (2015). Viewer Perception of Product Placement in Comedic Movies. American Journal of Management, 15(1), 36-43.

Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., Jr., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019-1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013194

Santa Ana, O., (2009). Did you call in Mexican? The racial politics of Jay Leno immigrant jokes. Lang. Soc. 38, 23-45.

Sarten, L. (1998, October 1). "Will and Grace" sitcom features two Gay characters. GLWeb:

The Rainbow Screen. Retrieved September 5, 2001, from http://www. Glweb.com/rainbow screen/archive/10-1-98.html.

Sawyer, S. F. (2009). Analysis of Variance: The Fundamental Concepts. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy, 17(2), 27E-38E.

Sedgewick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California

Press.

Sheldon, C. (1999). Lesbians and film: Some thoughts. In L. Gross and J. D. Woods (Eds.), The Columbia reader: On Lesbians and Gay men in media, society, and politics.(pp. 301-306). New York: Columbia University Press.

Simpson, P., (2003). On the Discourse of Satire: towards a Stylistic Model of Satirical Humor. Benjamins, Amsterdam.

Udo-Akang, D, (2012), Theoretical Constructs, Concepts, and Applications, American international journal of contemporary research, Vol. 2(9) www.aijcrnet.com

Weiss, A. (1992c). Post-war Hollywood Lesbians: Whose happy ending? In Vampires & violets: Lesbians in film. (pp. 51-83). New York: Penguin Books.

Yang, Alan S. (1997). Attitudes toward homosexuality. The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. (Autumn, 1997), pp. 477-507: Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2749583

Downloads

Published

2021-10-27

How to Cite

Mararo, F. ., Mberia, H. ., & Omoke, L. . (2021). Influence of Language use in Comedic Movies on Attitudes towards Sexual Orientations of University Students in Kenya. American Journal of Communication, 3(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.828

Issue

Section

Articles