Factors Leading to Spelling Change of English Language Words on Whatsapp
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.615Keywords:
Social Media, Spelling, Non-Standard, Conventional, ModificationAbstract
Purpose: This paper discusses the findings of a research study that sought to investigate the factors that lead to the change of spelling for some English language words by WhatsApp users in Botswana. The investigation was informed by some unconventional spelling of some words in the English language, which otherwise would seem easy to spell. Although writers on social media platforms do not have to conform to standard language rules, some nonstandard forms of spelling similar to those collected from the chat groups, have now evidenced to be cropping in the academic writing.
Methodology: Data were collected from WhatsApp chat groups. The chat groups comprised of young (university class groups) and a mixture of young and middle aged (in church, social and family groups) users. Daily observations and documentations of strikingly modified spellings of words on WhatsApp were done over a period of 12 months. The Content Analysis data collection method was employed to collect data from a set of written texts on WhatsApp chat groups mentioned.
Findings: The findings of the study unearthed a metamorphosis and alterations of words, replacement of /s/ with /z/, excision of some letters in the normal spelling of some words and substitution of letters with numbers. Factors such as being innovative, wanting to belong and speed of typing a text message amid the hype of everyday life, were realized.
Recommendations: It is hoped that the paper will influence social media users, particularly students, to be spelling sensitive and conform to standard rules when they write in more formal platforms such as school assignments.
Downloads
References
Ahmad M. Bataineh 2014 The Effect of Text Chat Assisted with Word Processors on Saudi English Major Students' Writing Accuracy and Productivity of Authentic Texts. iJET ‒ Volume 9, Issue 9: "Blended Learning", 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i9.4119
Al-kadi, A. & Ahmed, R. (2018). Evolution of English in the Internet Age. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(3):727-736. DOI: 10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9823
Bailey, S. (2011). Academic Writing: A Handbook for International Students. Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press.
Baron, S. N. (1998). Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email. Language and Communication 18: 133-170.
Baron, S. N. (2003). “Whatever.”: A New Language Model? The Atlantic Monthly
Crystal, D. (2001). The language of e-mail. In Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139164771.005
Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford University Press.
Eisenstein, J. (2015). Systematic patterning in phonologically motivated orthographic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19/2, 2015: 161–188.
Graddol, D. (2006). English Next: Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a Foreign Language’. British Council.
Jenkins, J. (2003). World English. Routledge.
Hashim F., Soopar, A. A. & Hamid, B. A. (2017). Linguistic Features of Malaysian Students’ Online Communicative Language in an Academic Setting: The Case of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Akademika 87(1), April 2017:231-242. http://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2017-8701-17
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R. and Daelemans, W. (2019). Adolescents’ perceptions of social media writing: Has non-standard become the new standard? De Gruyter Mouton EuJAL 2019; 7(2): 189–224.
Macmillan Online Dictionary https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british
Rao, P. S. (2019. The Role of English as a Global Language. Research Journal of English. Vol-4, Issue 1, 2019. ISSN: 2456-2696.
Songxaba, S.L. & Sincuba, L. (2019). ‘The effect of social media on English second language essay writing with special reference to WhatsApp’. Reading & Writing 10(1), a179. https://doi.org/10.4102/ rw.v10i1.179; ISSN: (Online) 2308-1422.
Stapa, S. H. & Shaari, A. H. (2012). Understanding Online Communicative Language Features In Social Networking Environment. GEMA Online™ Journal of Language Studies Volume 12(3), Special Section, September 2012.
Statistics Botswana Annual Report, (2019).
Strain-Moritz, T. E. (2016). Perceptions of Technology Use and Its Effects on Student Writing. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/
Streefkerk, R. (2020). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research.
https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-quantitative-research
Tladi, L. & Nleya, P. (2017). The influence of quality on e-learning implementation in Botswana tertiary institutions: The case for Botswana College of Distance and Open Learning. African Educational Research Journal Vol. 5(4), pp. 240-245, November 2017 ISSN: 2354-2160
Wilson, F. (2018). The Effect of Social Media on the Spelling Ability of Students: A Case Study of Federal College of Education (FCE) Yola. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, Volume 2 Issue 1. 2: 262-274.
Kadir, Z. A., Maros, M. & Hamid, B. A. (2012). Linguistic features in the online discussion forums. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 2(3): 276- 281.
Zedda-Sampson, L. (2013). Is U a Word or Do You Spell it with a Z? English Spelling in Australian Schools – Are We Getting it Write? Swinburne TAFE
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
