Information Source Attributes and Terrorism Risk Preparedness among the Residents of Nairobi City County
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajc.1887Keywords:
Source Attributes, Terrorism Risk Preparedness, Credibility, CompetenceAbstract
Purpose: The main purpose of the study was to establish the association of source attributes and terrorism risk preparedness among the residents of Nairobi City County.
Materials and Methods: This study followed a mixed-methods design comprising mainly of a questionnaire survey complemented by observation, key informant interviews and document analysis, The design employed the Concurrent Convergent (Triangulation) Parallel strategy. According to the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Nairobi City County has a resident population of 4,397,073. A further estimated 2.5 million non-residents visit the city-county daily for business, work, or as tourists and travelers in transit to other counties. Therefore, the target population for this study was approximately 6.5 million. The study population was drawn using stratified purposive random sampling technique where the list of all the sampling locations was categorized into four strata. The sample size was 640 respondents who were proportionately randomly drawn from four different strata.
Findings: Regression of coefficients showed that source attributes and terrorism risk preparedness were positively and significantly related (β=0.379, p=0.000). Specifically, 53.6% of the respondents agreed with the statement that receiving information from credible sources on terrorism attacks provides motivation for preparedness in case of a terrorist attack. Similarly, 64.8% agreed with the statement that consistency in terrorism risks communications provides motivation to preparedness behaviour adoption 62.6% of the respondents were in concurrence that competence among that communication terrorism risk preparedness was a motivating factor for preparedness. Further, only 43.1% of the respondents indicated that their organisations were using experts in terrorism risk communication and preparedness. 64.6% were of the opinion that involving non experts in decisions related to terrorism risk communications and preparedness can result in preparedness action taking laxity.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that professionals charged with emergency risk communication for terrorism preparedness should particularly: demonstrate expertise and competence in the subject matter to instill confidence in their audiences that the information is reliable and useful. This can be achieved by involving qualified professionals, experts, or organizations with relevant experience in emergency risk preparedness and build trust by being transparent, honest, and reliable in communication. Trust can also be enhanced by providing accurate information, acknowledging uncertainties when applicable, and addressing any concerns or doubts promptly.
Downloads
References
Aradau, C., & Van Munster, R. (2007). Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074290
Balakrishnan, M. S. (2011). Protecting from brand burn during times of crisis: Mumbai 26/11: a case of the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower Hotel. In Management Research Review (Vol. 34, Issue 12, pp. 1309–1333). https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171111186423
Boin, A., & Smith, D. (2006). Terrorism and critical infrastructures: Implications for public-private crisis management. Public Money and Management, 26(5), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00543.x
Boin, A., & 't Hart, P. (2010). Organising for effective emergency management: Lessons from research 1. Australian Journal of public administration, 69(4), 357-371.
Connors, P. (2009). Strategic communication through all stages of a major emergency life cycle , with particular reference to the needs of Ireland.
Coombs, W. T. (2004). Impact of Past Crises on Current Crisis Communication: Insights From Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Journal of Business Communication, 41(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943604265607
Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
Crelinsten, R. D. (1999). Terrorism and counter‐terrorism in a multi‐centric world: Challenges and opportunities. Terrorism and Political Violence, 11(4), 170–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546559908427539
Crelinsten, R. D. R. D. (2002). Analysing Terrorism and Counter-terrorism: A Communication Model. Terrorism and Political Violence, 14(2), 77–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005618
Darrell, B. (2003). Crisis Communication Handbook Communication Handbook.
Darrell, B. (2008). Crisis Communications Handbook Crisis Communications Handbook. Swedish Emergency Management Agency. David,.
Darrell, B. (2008). Crisis Communications Handbook Crisis Communications Handbook. Swedish Emergency Management Agency. David,.
Falkheimer, J. (2014). Crisis communication and terrorism: The Norway attacks on 22 July 2011. Corporate Communications, 19(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2012-0053
Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2014). From Public Relations to Strategic Communication in Sweden. Nordicom Review, 35, 123–138.
Fischhoff, B. (2013). Risk Perception and communication (p. 15). https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203140710-7
Fischhoff, B., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). Evaluating the success of terror risk communications. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism : Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 1(4), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1089/153871303771861450
Gentle, S., & Mount, T. (2008). Risk , Crisis and Disaster Management Level 2. 1–122.
Gray, G. M., & Ropeik, D. P. (2002). Dealing with the dangers of fear: The role of risk communication. Health Affairs, 21(6), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.106
Jenkins, B. M., Butterworth, B. R., & Shrum, K. S. (2010). Terrorist Attacks On Public Bus Transportation: A Preliminary Empirical Analysis. 126.
Kasperson, R. E., Webler, T., Ram, B., & Sutton, J. (2022). The social amplification of risk framework: New perspectives. Risk Analysis, 42(7), 1367–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13926
Matusitz, J. (2007). Improving Terrorism Preparedness for Hospitals: Toward Better Interorganizational Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(3), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701434801
Mythen, G. (2006). Communicating the terrorist risk: Harnessing a culture of fear? Crime, Media, Culture, 2(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659006065399
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
Pancic, N. (2010). Crisis Communication in theory and practice : Analysis of cultural influence , strategy applicability , and stakeholder relevance in Australia and New Zealand.
Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2008). News Frames Terrorism: A Comparative Analysis of Frames Employed in Terrorism Coverage in U.S. and U.K. Newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161207312676
Ranstorp, M., & Wilkinson, P. (2005). Special Issue on Terrorism and Human Rights-Introduction. Terrorism And Political Violence, 17(1-2), 3-8.
Reynolds, B. J., & Shenhar, G. (2016). Crisis and emergency risk communication. Koenig and Schultz’s Disaster Medicine: Comprehensive Principles and Practices, October, 390–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/153567600501000106
Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. (2012). Crisis and Emergency Risk Communicatino: 2012 Edition. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 478. emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/pdf/CERC_2012edition.pdf
Rogers, M. B., Amlôt, R., Rubin, G. J., Wessely, S., & Krieger, K. (2007). Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: the role of risk perception and risk communication. International Review of Psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 19(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260701349373
Rothenberger, L. (2012). Terrorist Groups : Using Internet and Social Media for Disseminating Ideas . New Tools for Promoting Political Change « Terrorist Groups : Using Internet and Social Media for Disseminating Ideas . New Tools for Promoting Political Change ». www.ceeol.com.
Ruggiero, A. (2016). Making communication strategy choices in a fast evolving crisis situation-results from a table-top discussion on an anthrax scenario. Social Sciences, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5020019
Schmid, A. P., & Price, E. (2011). Selected literature on radicalization and de-radicalization of terrorists: Monographs, Edited Volumes, Grey Literature and Prime Articles published since the 1960s. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(4), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9287-4
Sheppard, B. (2011). Mitigating Terror and Avoidance Behavior through the Risk Perception Matrix to Augment Resilience. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1840
Sheppard, B. (2020). Mitigating Terror and Avoidance Behavior through the Risk Perception Matrix to Augment Resilience. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1840
Trumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. (2003). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23(2), 343-353.
Wood, M. M., Mileti, D. S., Kano, M., Kelley, M. M., Regan, R., & Bourque, L. B. (2012). Communicating Actionable Risk for Terrorism and Other Hazards. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01645.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miring’u Edward Waweru, Prof. M. M. Sakwa, Dr. Julius Bosire
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
