Organic and Conventional Agriculture- A Comparative Economics: Bulletin of Agrarian State University from Moldova: 2022; (5/462):123-130. ISSN 1994-2796 (Print) Scientific Article

Authors

  • Zolotariov Petru Scientist, Expert in Organic Agriculture, Republic of Moldova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/aja.1555

Keywords:

Organic Agriculture, Market, Sustainability, Externalities

Abstract

The main problem of agriculture is finding a compromise between (1) food security and (2) minimal nega- tive impact on the environment. Currently, the first task is called upon to solve traditional agriculture, the second "” organic. To identify the most sustainable type of agriculture, it is important to compare their economic aspects. When comparing, the analogy method was used. To assess the dynamics of demand for organic products and resources for their production, data from the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), the National Organic Union and the Union of Organic Farming were analyzed. The purpose of the study: to identify the benefits and opportunities of organic agriculture, the conditions for its long-term sustainability. The problem under consideration: the choice of the most appropriate type of agricul- ture for solving the main problems of the industry. The study showed that the driver for the development of organic agriculture in developed countries is consumer demand and a number of positive externalities, while the limiting factors for the wide distribution of this type are the high price of products, the decrease in the level of food security of countries, the need to increase the cost of research and development of specific technologies. In the short term, traditional agriculture will continue to dominate due to higher productivity. Organic agriculture, with an increase in research costs and the introduction of innovations, can compete with traditional agriculture in the long term.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allaire G, PomeÌon T, MaigneÌ E, Cahuzac E, Simioni M, Desjeux Y. Territorial analysis of the diffusion of organic farming in France: Between heterogeneity and spatial dependence. Ecological Indicators. 2015;59:70-81.

Cohn AS, Newton P, Gil JD, Kuhl L, Samberg L, Ricciardi V, etc. Smallholder agriculture and climate change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2017;42(1):347-375.

Durham TC, Mizik T. Comparative Economics of Conventional, Organic, and Alternative Agricultural Production Systems. Economies. 2021;9(2):1-22.

Knudsen M. T., Hermansen J. E., Halberg N., Andreasen L., Williams A. Life cycle assessment of organic food and farming systems: methodological challenges related to greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration // FAO: Agriculture and Climate change mitigation. A report of the round table on organic agriculture and climate change. 2011. P. 33-60.

Niggli U. Sustainability of organic food production: Challenges and innovations // Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 2015. Vol. 74, no. 1. P. 83-88.

Rahmann G., Reza Ardakani M., Bàrberi P. et al. Organic Agriculture 3.0 is innovation with research // Organic Agriculture. 2017. Vol. 7. P. 169-197.

Seufert V., Ramankutty N. Foley J. A. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture // Nature. 2012. Vol. 485. P. 229-232.

Tomaš-Simin M., Jankovic D. Applicability of diffusion of innovation theory in organic agriculture // Ekonomika poljoprivrede. 2017. Vol. 61. P. 517-529.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-10

How to Cite

Petru, Z. . (2023). Organic and Conventional Agriculture- A Comparative Economics: Bulletin of Agrarian State University from Moldova: 2022; (5/462):123-130. ISSN 1994-2796 (Print) Scientific Article. American Journal of Agriculture, 5(2), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.47672/aja.1555

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.