Research on the Coordinated Development of the Quality and Quantity of Employment of the New Generation of Migrant Workers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/jde.2867Keywords:
New Generation, Migrant Workers, Employment Quality, Coordinated DevelopmentAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to construct an evaluation system for the coordinated development of quantity and quality of employment among China's new-generation migrant workers. Based on five core dimensions’ employment capacity, environment, security, remuneration, and labor relations it establishes comprehensive indicators to dynamically measure the coordinated level of employment quality at the national and provincial levels from 2011 to 2023. The study seeks to reveal the evolutionary laws and structural contradictions of this system, identify regional heterogeneity, dynamic polarization, and short-board bottlenecks, and provide theoretical and policy support for addressing the coexisting dilemma of "difficulty in recruiting workers" and "difficulty in finding jobs" while promoting high-quality and full employment.
Materials and Methods: This study employs the CRITIC objective weighting method to determine indicator weights and introduces a multi-system coordination index model along with kernel density estimation to calculate static/dynamic coordinated development indices.
Findings: The comprehensive evaluation of employment quality reveals significant static regional heterogeneity, with a persistent development gap between high- and low-performing regions. Dynamic evolution analysis indicates that overall employment quality is improving, but this improvement is accompanied by local polarization. Policy intervention has driven short-term convergence and long-term differentiation in resilience. The coordination index evaluation reveals multidimensional structural weaknesses, among which employment security and labor remuneration have become key bottlenecks restricting overall coordinated development.
Implications to Theory, Practice, and Policy: Theoretically, it reveals the impact mechanism of the five-dimensional synergy of employment ability, environment, security, compensation, and relationship on the coordination of quantity and quality of employment for the new generation of migrant workers, enriching the theoretical explanation of the "quantity and quality imbalance" in structural employment contradictions. At the policy level, it is recommended to establish a dynamic monitoring system, coordinate the five-dimensional improvement policies, implement regional differentiated interventions, and address the shortcomings in employment security and labor remuneration. In practice, providing quantitative guidance for government planning and enterprise manpower adjustment, alleviating the contradiction between skill mismatch and insufficient guarantees, and promoting high-quality and full employment.
Downloads
References
Congna, H., & Saad, N. (2025). The impact of human capital on employment quality: A scoping review. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2552352. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2552352
Ferragina, A. M., & Pastore, F. (2008). Mind the Gap: Unemployment in the New Eu Regions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 73–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00534.x
Klapcsik, S. (2025). The Role of the Migrant in European Identity and Cinema. Eastern European Screen Studies, 16(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2024.2359831
Li, Z., Gao, F., Hu, X., Wu, Y., & Li, M. (2024). Relative poverty and urban living willingness of new-generation migrant workers—Evidence from the China Migrant Dynamics Survey. Cities, 153, 105258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105258
Liang, W. (2024). Research on the Risks and Countermeasures of Migrant Workers’ Returning to Their Hometowns to Start Businesses under the Background of the Rural Revitalization Strategy. Asia Pacific Economic and Management Review, 1(6), 34–39. https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v1i6.103
Mandelman F. S., & Zlate A. (2022). Offshoring, Automation, Low-Skilled Immigration, and Labor Market Polarization. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 14(1), 355–389. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180205
Praag, L. V. (2025). Constructing migrant capital in Belgium: Migrants’ views on the translation of capital types across fields and time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51, 1875–1891. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2381704
Rizky, T. R., Fadliyanti, L., & Husni, V. H. (2024). Analysis of Factors Influencing Repeat Migration Decisions of Indonesian Migrant Workers. Socio-Economic and Humanistic Aspects for Township and Industry, 2(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.59535/sehati.v2i1.207
Santika, R., & Farizki, R. (2025). The Role of Digital Transformation in Labor Market Changes: An Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Automation on the Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Applied Econometric, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.59784/journaljoae.v1i1.3
Ying, L. G. (2006). An institutional convergence perspective on China’s recent growth experience: A research note. Papers in Regional Science, 85(2), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00059.x
Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., Dong, J., Gao, F., Zhang, W., & Gong, W. (2020). Spatial production or sustainable development? An empirical research on the urbanization of less-developed regions based on the case of Hexi Corridor in China. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0235351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235351
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kun Zhou, Yuxin Lu, Shuying Yu, Wenyu Yang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.