Role of Street-Level Bureaucrats and Policy Implementation. Case of Environmental Policy at Ministry of Environment, Climate Change and Forestry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.2856Keywords:
Street-Level Bureaucrats, Policy Implementation, Discretionary Judgement, Discretionary Decision-Making, Interpretation of Discretion; and Socialization with Policy UsersAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the interpretation of discretion on environmental policy implementation and socializing with policy users on environmental policy implementation in the ministry.
Materials and Methods: The study adopted a descriptive research design to answer the research questions. Senior officials and lower-echelon officials were targeted for data collection. Stratified and simple random sampling techniques were employed to sample 45 officials for response collection. Interview guides and open-ended questionnaires were used to gather responses. A pilot study was carried out on 40 respondents to test the validity and reliability of data collection instruments. Cronbach’s alpha equal to or greater than 0.7 was used as a yardstick to measure the reliability of data collection instruments. Quantitative data collected were analyzed using SPSS 25 into descriptive and inferential statistics and thereafter presented using pie charts, graphs, means, tables, standard deviations, regression, and correlation. Collected qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis and presented in various themes, narratives, and discourses alongside the main variables of the study. The study was strictly guided by principles underpinning research ethical considerations.
Findings: The study found out that interpretation of discretion and socialization with policy users significantly influence environmental policy implementation in Kenya. Leadership effectiveness, cooperative consultation, trust-building, and cultural sensitivity were critical factors enhancing policy outcomes. Street-level bureaucrats employ discretionary judgment, adapt strategies to local contexts, and engage stakeholders collaboratively, while socialization improves understanding, compliance, and behavioral change.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: The study’s unique contribution to theory is its identification of key factors such as discretionary judgment and socialization, which significantly affect policy outcomes in the context of environmental policy implementation. In practice, it emphasizes the importance of leadership and cooperation, suggesting that these elements should be enhanced to improve policy effectiveness. It provides valuable insights for policymakers by recommending the strengthening of discretionary decision-making frameworks and the institutionalization of strategic socialization protocols to support better policy implementation and outcomes.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, U., Khalid, N., Ammar, A., & Shah, M. H. (2017). Assessing moderation of employee engagement on the relationship between work discretion, job clarity and business performance in the banking sector of Pakistan. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 7(12), 1197.
Baviskar, S., & Winter, S. C. (2017). Street-level bureaucrats as individual policymakers: The relationship between attitudes and coping behavior toward vulnerable children and youth. International Public Management Journal, 20(2), 316-353.
Cohen, N. (2018). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. The American review of public administration, 48(2), 175-187.
Eshun, P. A., & Okyere, E. (2017). Assessment of the challenges in policy implementation in the small scale gold mining sector in Ghana–a case study. Ghana Mining Journal, 17(1), 54-63.
Eshun, P. A., & Okyere, E. (2017). Assessment of the challenges in policy implementation in the small scale gold mining sector in Ghana–a case study. Ghana Mining Journal, 17(1), 54-63.
Ferreira, V. D. R. S., & Medeiros, J. J. (2016). Factors that shape the behavior of street-level bureaucrats in the public policy implementation process. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 14, 776-793.
Fischer, F., Lange, K., Klose, K., Greiner, W., & Kraemer, A. (2016). Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation—a scoping review. In Healthcare (Vol. 4, No. 3, p. 36). MDPI.
Howes, M., Wortley, L., Potts, R., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Serrao-Neumann, S., Davidson, J., ... & Nunn, P. (2017). Environmental sustainability: a case of policy implementation failure?. Sustainability, 9(2), 165.
Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?. Policy design and practice, 2(1), 1-14.
Hughes, A., & Condon, L. (2016). Street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation in community public health nursing: a qualitative study of the experiences of student and novice health visitors. Primary health care research & development, 17(6), 586-598.
Hupe, P. (Ed.). (2019). Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Igbokwe-Ibeto, C. J. (2019). African bureaucracy and public administration: Analysing the normative impediments and prospects. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 7(1), 1-11.
Khan, A. R. (2016). Policy implementation: Some aspects and issues. Journal of Community Positive Practices, (3), 3-12.
Kipchumba, H. E., Minja, D., & Kiruthu, F. (2021). Factors Influencing the Use of Discretion in The Control of Illicit Brew Trade in Kenya, A Case of Kakamega and Uasin Gishu Counties. African Journal of Alcohol and Drug Abuse (AJADA), 31-40.
Kipo-Sunyehzi, D. D. (2023). Street-level bureaucrat's coping strategies in health policy implementation: a comparative case study from Sawla-Tuna-Kalba district of Ghana. Social Theory & Health, 21(3), 267-285.
Lee, D. S., & Park, S. (2021). What motivates street-level bureaucrats to implement the reforms of elected politicians?. Policy & Politics, 49(1), 141-160.
Lipsky, M., (1983). BUREAUCRACY, S. L. DILEMMAS OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN PUBLIC SERVICES BY MICHAEL LIPSKY.
Lucy, A. E., Nyangia, O. E., & Orodho, A. (2015). Challenges facing implementation of inclusive education in public secondary schools in Rongo Sub-County, Migori County, Kenya.
Luthfia, A. R., & Alkhajar, E. N. S. (2020). Street-Level Bureaucrat as Policy Implementation Spearhead. In CONVASH 2019: Proceedings of the 1st Conference of Visual Art, Design, and Social Humanities by Faculty of Art and Design, CONVASH 2019, 2 November 2019, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia (p. 319). European Alliance for Innovation.
May, C. R., Johnson, M., & Finch, T. (2016). Implementation, context and complexity. Implementation science, 11, 1-12.
Mburu, M., & Makori, M. (2015). Management challenges facing the implementation of youth development projects in Kenya. A case study of youth enterprise funded projects in Nairobi County. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 2(1).
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2014). Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 409-427.
Ndlovu, N. P., & Nzuma, T. M. (2024). The implementation of agroforestry in Namibia: A street-level bureaucracy perspective. Forest Policy and Economics, 168, 103299.
Ochieng, G. O. (2021). The role of street-level bureaucrats in the implementation of the 100% transition policy for deaf students: a case of principals in secondary schools for the deaf in Kenya.
OKOTH, B. O. (2021). INFLUENCE OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP ON IMPLEMENTATION OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES BY KAKAMEGA COUNTY GOVERNMENT, KENYA (Doctoral dissertation, KABARAK UNIVERSITY).
Okumu, G. O. (2021). Exploring how the head teachers as street-level bureaucrats influence the implementation of competency-based curriculum in Kenya.
Onyango, G. (2019). Organizational trust and accountability reforms in public management: Analysis of inter-agency implementation relations in Kenya. International Journal of Public Administration.
Pepinsky, T. B., Pierskalla, J. H., & Sacks, A. (2017). Bureaucracy and service delivery. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 249-268.
Petersen, A. C., Christensen, L. R., & Hildebrandt, T. T. (2020). The role of discretion in the age of automation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 29(3), 303-333.
Pivoras, S., & Kaselis, M. (2019). The impact of client status on street-level bureaucrats’ identity and informal accountability. Public Integrity, 21(2), 182-194.
Pramusinto, A., & Quah, J. S. (2016). Weak central authority and fragmented bureaucracy: A study of policy implementation in Indonesia. The Role of the Public Bureaucracy in Policy Implementation in Five ASEAN Countries, 9, 98.
Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2017). Implementing public policy. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 115-134). Routledge.
Rushemuka, M. N. (2019). Assessing local land-use plans implementation process in Huye district of Rwanda: A street-level bureaucrats’ perspective (Doctoral dissertation, University Freiburg).
Shim, D. C., Park, H. H., & Eom, T. H. (2017). Street-level bureaucrats’ turnover intention: Does public service motivation matter?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 563-582.
Tuokuu, F. X. D., Gruber, J. S., Idemudia, U., & Kayira, J. (2018). Challenges and opportunities of environmental policy implementation: Empirical evidence from Ghana's gold mining sector. Resources Policy, 59, 435-445.
Viennet, R., & Pont, B. (2017). Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework.
Wamalwa, E. W. (2015). Implementation challenges of free maternity services policy in Kenya: the health workers’ perspective. Pan African Medical Journal, 22(1).
Yampolskiy, R. V., & Duettmann, A. (Eds.). (2020). Artificial superintelligence: Coordination & strategy. MDPI.
Yamungu, N. E. (2019). Street-level bureaucrats and piecemeal planning approaches in the Tanzanian small towns of Mlandizi and Sirari (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street: Public service and moral agency. Harvard university press.
Zedekia, S. (2017). Street level bureaucrats as the ultimate policy makers. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 5(4), 306.
Zulu, J. M., Blystad, A., Haaland, M. E., Michelo, C., Haukanes, H., & Moland, K. M. (2019). Why teach sexuality education in school? Teacher discretion in implementing comprehensive sexuality education in rural Zambia. International journal for equity in health, 18, 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jumanne, Dr. Stanely Ontiri Motieri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
