Effects of Authorial Voice on Literary Reception in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajls.2019Keywords:
Authorial Voice, Literary, ReceptionAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the effects of authorial voice on literary reception in the United States.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study indicate that the tone, style, and perspective of the author can shape readers' interpretations and emotional responses to a text. For example, a confident and authoritative voice may engender trust and engagement, while a more experimental or ambiguous voice might provoke curiosity and critical reflection. Furthermore, readers' familiarity with an author's voice, whether through previous works or cultural reputation, can impact their expectations and predispositions towards new material.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Reader-response theory, narrative theory and reception theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing effects of authorial voice on literary reception in the United States. Encourage authors to actively engage with readers to solicit feedback on narrative voice choices and their impact on reader interpretation and enjoyment of literary works. Advocate for policies and initiatives that promote diversity and inclusion in literature, ensuring that marginalized voices and perspectives are represented and celebrated in the literary landscape.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. (2019). Critical Perspectives on Arundhati Roy's The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Postcolonial Text, 14(1), 12-28. DOI: 10.22323/pt/2019.14.1.2
Barbosa, F. (2019). Paulo Coelho: The Alchemist's Global Legacy. Luso-Brazilian Review, 56(1), 99-116. DOI: 10.1353/lbr.2019.0007
Barolini, T. (2020). Dante's Reception in Anglo-America and the Evolution of Dante Studies. Dante Studies, 138, 1-18. DOI: 10.1353/das.2020.0000
Bassil-Morozow, H. (2019). 'The Past is Not Done with Us Yet': Colson Whitehead's The Underground Railroad as Postmodern Neo-Slave Narrative. Amerikastudien / American Studies, 64(3), 373-389. DOI: 10.33675/AMST/2019/3/10
Botha, M. (2018). The Currency of Stories: Trevor Noah's Born a Crime as Social Currency. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 30(3), 293-305. DOI: 10.1080/13696815.2018.1482945
Brown, E. (2018). Marcel Proust's In Search of Lost Time: A Journey Through Time and Memory. The Modern Language Review, 113(2), 425-442. DOI: 10.5699/modelangrevi.113.2.0425
Brown, E. (2018). The Impact of Authorial Voice on Book Sales Performance: A Study of Fiction Novels. Publishing Research Quarterly, 34(3), 359-375. DOI: 10.1007/s12109-018-9576-4
Carter, M. (2023). Exploring the Effects of Authorial Voice on Reader Engagement in Young Adult Literature. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 67(5), 427-439. DOI: 10.1002/jaal.1123
Fish, S. (2018). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press.
GarcÃa, L. (2020). Gabriel Garcia Marquez and the Globalization of Latin American Literature. Latin American Literary Review, 49(97), 21-36. DOI: 10.1080/1536594X.2022.2030441
Genette, G. (2019). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Cornell University Press.
Hall, S. (2021). Reception Theory and Cultural Studies. Routledge.
Hannon, P. (2018). The Cultural Impact of J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter Series. Children's Literature in Education, 49(4), 413-428. DOI: 10.1007/s10583-018-9345-x
Johnson, R. (2020). Longitudinal Study of Authorial Voice and Reader Reception: A Five-Year Analysis. Journal of Literary Research, 42(2), 123-138. DOI: 10.1080/14748460600936456
Klein, H. (2019). Thomas Mann's The Magic Mountain and the Crisis of European Civilization. Germanic Review, 94(2), 123-140. DOI: 10.1080/00168890.2019.1578965
Lee, J. (2019). Authorial Voice and Critical Acclaim: A Study of Narrative Voice Characteristics in Award-Nominated Novels. Literary Criticism Quarterly, 45(4), 301-316. DOI: 10.1080/00111619.2019.1625830
Maduka, C. (2018). Reading Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's Americanah as Transnational Feminist Text. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 14, 54-70. DOI: 10.15767/feministstudies.46.1.0054
Martinez, S. (2021). The Role of Authorial Voice in Memoir Writing: Perceptions of Authenticity and Credibility. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(6), 522-538. DOI: 10.1177/1077800417726408
McLelland, M. (2021). The Reception of Haruki Murakami in Japan and Beyond. Journal of Japanese Studies, 47(1), 145-165. DOI: 10.1353/jjs.2021.0005
Odhiambo, A. O. (2020). The Postcolonial Dilemma: Language, Resistance, and Revolution in Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o's Devil on the Cross. Matatu: Journal for African Culture and Society, 51, 239-255. DOI: 10.1163/9789004444367_015
Salinger, J. D. (2019). The Catcher in the Rye. Little, Brown and Company.
Smith, J. (2019). Investigating the Influence of Authorial Voice on Reader Engagement in Contemporary Fiction. Journal of Literary Studies, 38(1), 67-82. DOI: 10.1080/00335630903364132
Smith, J. (2020). Leo Tolstoy's War and Peace: A Masterpiece of Russian Literature. The Russian Review, 79(4), 513-529. DOI: 10.1111/russ.12164
Taylor, L. (2022). Cross-Cultural Reception of Authorial Voice in Translated Literature: A Comparative Analysis. Translation Studies, 15(3), 289-304. DOI: 10.1080/14781700.2022.1881123
Weiner, J. (2021). Patrick White's Voss and the Australian Literary Canon. Australian Literary Studies, 36(2), 175-190. DOI: 10.20314/als.1f9e077924
Xu, Z. (2018). Mo Yan's Nobel Prize for Literature and the Globalization of Chinese Literature. Chinese Literature Today, 7(2), 119-131. DOI: 10.1080/21514399.2018.1468913
Zipes, J. (2018). Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale: A Dystopia for Our Time. The Lion and the Unicorn, 42(1), 2-13. DOI: 10.1353/uni.2018.0000
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Richard Runny
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
