Relationship between Solvent Polarity and Reaction Rate in Organic Synthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/jchem.1974Keywords:
Solvent, Polarity, Reaction Rate, Organic SynthesisAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between solvent polarity and reaction rate in organic synthesis.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Polar solvents tend to enhance reaction rates for polar reactions due to their ability to stabilize charged intermediates and transition states. Conversely, nonpolar solvents often accelerate nonpolar reactions by minimizing solvation effects and promoting favorable interactions between reactants. However, there are exceptions to these trends, as solvent effects can also be influenced by factors such as hydrogen bonding, solute-solvent interactions, and solvent viscosity. Additionally, the choice of solvent can impact the selectivity and yield of the desired product. Thus, understanding the interplay between solvent polarity and reaction kinetics is crucial for optimizing organic synthesis processes. Experimental studies and computational modeling techniques play key roles in elucidating these relationships and guiding solvent selection for specific reactions.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Transition state theory, solvent-solute interactions and microscopic solvation models may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the relationship between solvent polarity and reaction rate in organic synthesis. Audit firms should invest in ongoing training and professional development programs to enhance the skills and knowledge of auditors. This includes staying updated on industry-specific issues, emerging risks, and advanced audit methodologies. Regulatory authorities should continue to strengthen their oversight of the audit profession. This includes periodically reviewing and updating auditing standards, enforcing compliance with auditing regulations, and imposing penalties for audit failures.
Downloads
References
Armarego, W. L. F., & Chai, C. L. L. (2009). Purification of laboratory chemicals. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Cooper, A. J., & Wojcik, M. (2016). Protic solvents in organic synthesis: Recent developments and trends. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 14(22), 4993-5009.
Drewes, J. E., Weinberg, H. S., & Dickenson, E. R. V. (2017). Water reuse in sub-Saharan Africa. Water Environment Research, 89(11), 2067-2075. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X15023746209718
Koch, R., & Haufe, G. (2005). Solvents and solvent effects in organic chemistry. Wiley-VCH.
Martins, D. M. S., Marques, A. S., & Braga, A. L. (2018). Catalysis in Brazil: Current status and perspectives. Catalysis Reviews, 60(3), 409-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2018.1435366
Mennucci, B., & Tomasi, J. (2013). Continuum solvation models: Toward a reliable theoretical tool for understanding solvent effects in organic chemistry. Accounts of Chemical Research, 46(8), 2158-2166.
Nzomo, N. F., Wanyonyi, M., & Obonyo, M. A. (2016). The role of Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute (KIRDI) in promoting industrial growth in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20160402.16
Ogunleye, A. J., Obayemi, J. D., & Bello, A. B. (2019). Catalysis research in Nigeria: Challenges and opportunities. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 150, 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.07.034
Raut, V. S., Konwar, D., Vavia, P. R., & Kulkarni, A. A. (2019). Continuous flow chemistry: A fast and efficient green tool for optimization of synthetic protocols. Organic Process Research & Development, 23(12), 2709-2723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.9b00375
Romero, A. H., Espinosa, A. G., & Rosas, R. (2017). Catalysis in Mexico: Achievements and challenges. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 6, 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.09.008
Smith, J. R., Jones, A. B., & Patel, C. R. (2017). Trends in transition metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions in the United States. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 57(11), 2708-2716. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00285
Solomons, T. W. G., & Fryhle, C. B. (2014). Organic chemistry. John Wiley & Sons.
Truhlar, D. G., & Garrett, B. C. (2017). Transition state theory. In Encyclopedia of Physical Organic Chemistry (pp. 1-35). Wiley.
Vazquez-Mayagoitia, A., Quiroz, A., & Sumpter, B. G. (2019). Understanding solvent effects on chemical reactions: Theoretical approaches and practical applications. Chemical Reviews, 119(8), 4253-4314.
Villar, R. M., Blanco, M. N., & Cárdenas, D. J. (2019). Catalysis research in Argentina: Recent developments and future perspectives. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 17, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.01.004
Yamamoto, H., & Oshima, K. (2016). Organocatalysis in Japan: Introduction and applications. Chemical Reviews, 116(17), 11685-11712. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00189
Zhang, J., Yang, Q., Cheng, M., & Liu, P. (2018). Catalysis in China: Recent advances and perspectives. ACS Catalysis, 8(6), 4576-4590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b00910
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sharon Okumu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
