Impact of Microfinance Interventions on Poverty Alleviation in Rural Communities in Chad

Authors

  • Khadidja Tour

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ijpid.2013

Keywords:

Microfinance, Interventions, Poverty, Alleviation, Rural Communities

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of microfinance interventions on poverty alleviation in rural communities in Chad.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: Access to microfinance services, such as small loans and savings accounts, has empowered individuals in these communities to start or expand their own businesses, leading to increased income generation and economic self-sufficiency. Secondly, microfinance programs often prioritize women as beneficiaries, recognizing their role as key agents of change within their families and communities. Consequently, women who participate in microfinance initiatives have experienced enhanced decision-making power, improved socio-economic status, and better access to education and healthcare for themselves and their families. Additionally, microfinance interventions have been found to foster social capital and community cohesion by promoting group lending models and collective responsibility among borrowers. However, challenges remain, including issues of sustainability, scalability, and the need for complementary support services to address broader structural constraints.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social capital theory, financial inclusion theory and capability approach may be used to anchor future studies on assessing impact of microfinance interventions on poverty alleviation in rural communities in Chad. In practice, microfinance institutions (MFIs) should adopt a holistic approach that combines multiple microfinance services to address the diverse needs of rural communities. From a policy perspective, governments and policymakers should prioritize the development of supportive regulatory frameworks and conducive environments for microfinance institutions to thrive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhtar, S., & Rahman, M. (2018). Microfinance interventions and poverty reduction: A comparative study of Bangladesh and Nepal. Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 168-179.

Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2019). Good economics for hard times: Better answers to our biggest problems. PublicAffairs.

Cole, S., & Fernando, A. (2019). The value of advice: Evidence from mobile phone-based agricultural extension. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(3), 1266-1295.

Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Klapper, L. (2018). Financial inclusion and inclusive growth: A review of recent empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(3), 804-827.

Department for Work and Pensions. (2020). Households below average income: 1994/95 to 2019/20. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/households-below-average-income-199495-to-201920

Duflo, E., Kremer, M., & Robinson, J. (2018). Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review, 108(4-5), 1139-1184.

Gasparini, L., & Lustig, N. (2019). The rise and fall of income inequality in Latin America. Economía, 19(2), 1-38.

Gupta, A., & Patel, R. (2019). Microsavings and poverty alleviation: Evidence from rural India. World Development, 114, 281-291.

Ismail, A. G., Azman-Saini, W. N. W., & Amran, N. A. (2019). Empowerment and capability approach: Towards a new framework for rural development. Social Indicators Research, 141(3), 1109-1135.

Kabeer, N., & Islam, A. (2023). Microfinance and women's empowerment: Exploring gender dynamics in rural Ethiopia. Development and Change, 54(1), 159-184.

Kaplan, L., & Ngo, T. (2021). Social capital and microfinance: A review of current research. World

Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2018). Long-run price elasticities of demand for credit: Evidence from a countrywide field experiment in Mexico. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(9), 3499-3538.

Li, X., Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2019). The impact of microfinance interventions on poverty alleviation in rural China: A meta-analysis. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 156-166.

Morduch, J. (2019). The economics of microfinance (3rd ed.). The MIT Press.

Morduch, J. (2019). The economics of microfinance (3rd ed.). The MIT Press.

Nguyen, T. T., Tran, T. H., & Nguyen, T. H. (2021). Financial literacy and poverty alleviation: Evidence from rural Vietnam. World Development, 141, 105360.

OECD. (2018). Society at a glance: Asia/Pacific 2018. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264308525-en

Rahman, S. (2020). Microinsurance and health-related shocks: Evidence from rural Pakistan. Health Policy and Planning, 35(1), 103-113.

Smith, J. (2018). Microcredit and poverty alleviation: Evidence from rural Bangladesh. Journal of Development Studies, 54(3), 456-472.

United States Census Bureau. (2020). Income and poverty in the United States: 2019. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2020/demo/p60-270.html

World Bank. (2020). Poverty and shared prosperity 2020: Reversals of fortune. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33748

Downloads

Published

2024-05-08

How to Cite

Tour, K. (2024). Impact of Microfinance Interventions on Poverty Alleviation in Rural Communities in Chad. International Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47672/ijpid.2013

Issue

Section

Articles