Women and Rural Development in the Context of Decentralisation in Tubah Council, North West Region of Cameroon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ijpid.1745Keywords:
Rural Development, Decentralisation, Gender, Tubah Council, Nord-West Region of CameroonAbstract
Purpose: Before 1990s, the decentralisation process in Cameroon has gone through several stages. This process really materialised with the revision of the Cameroon Constitution in 1996. Owing to that, several laws concerning this process were promulgated. Decentralisation should eventually make all decentralised territorial authorities autonomous. This government policy, which is part of the bottom-up approach, has the responsibility to promote the participation of the population. Thus, one is entitled to ask how decentralisation in Cameroon can impact women’s participation in rural development in the Tubah council?
Materials and Methods: To answer this question, primary and secondary data were mobilised and processed according to appropriate methods for the variables studied. Primary data were collected from observation, interviews of key informants and administration of questionnaires addressed to a sample of 145 people in the council area. Secondary data were obtained from internet sources, textbooks as well as documentations and libraries. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptives and inferentials statistics meanwhile content analysis was used for qualitative data analysis.
Findings: The results show that even if the decentralisation process does not pay particular attention to women, it contributes to the creation of a favourable framework for local development initiatives. Thus, 79% of the women in the Tubah area act individually, compared with 21% who take part in group actions. Their actions varied, with 40% in the field of agriculture and 30% to drinking water supply projects. Identified as one of the pillars of development in rural areas, the intervention of women, if well supervised and structured, it can boost development in a sustainable and effective way.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study recommends that councils within the process of decentralisation should encourage women participation in rural development by ensuring their high representativeness. It also goes in line with the theory of decentralisation, which states that in order to promote local and participatory development, the transfer of power to local authorities must be effective. The study emphasises on the fact that, the transfer should not only be at the level of power and finances, but it should also include the social categories, must especially women, who are one of the main actors of rural development in Cameroon.
Downloads
References
Ahl H., Berglund K., Pettersson K. and Tillmar M. (2023). Women’s contributions to rural
development: implications for entrepreneurship policy. In https://www.emerald.com/insight/1355-2554.htm.
Cheka C. (2007). The State of the Process of Decentralisation in Cameroon in Africa Development, Vol. XXXII, No. 2, 2007, pp. 179–194.
Coulibaly M. (1993). "La décentralisation... pour quoi faire ?". Décentralisation, journal d'information et de réflexion sur la décentralisation (février), Mission de Décentralisation (Bamako).
Deberre J-C. (2007). Décentralisation et développement local », Afrique contemporaine, 2007/1 n° 221, p. 45-54. DOI: 10.3917/afco.221.0045.
Eta M.B. (2016). Women’s work in the West Virginia economy.W. Va. Hist. 49, 7–20.
FAO (2015). The State of Food Insecurity in the World: Addressing Food Insecurity in Protracted Crises; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015.
FAO (2017). Prevention of post-harvest food losses: Fruits, vegetables and root crops. A training manual. Rome, Italy. ICRW:Washington DC, USA.
Jayawera R. (2010). Industrial enterprises and economic space: The network
paradigm. European Planning Studies 4(4) pp. 485-498
Jazamy A. M. (2015). Impact of Demographics, Social Capital and Participation in Income Generating Activities (IGAs) on Economic Empowerment of Rural Women in Bangladesh. Test Eng. Manag. 82, 1911–1924.
Kassibo B. (1997). La Décentralisation au Mali: État des Lieux », Bulletin de l'APAD [En ligne], 14 | 1997, mis en ligne le 26 janvier 2007, consulté le 07 septembre 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ apad/579; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/apad.579 21p.
Khan S. A. (2011). Decentralization and Women Empowerment: Exploring the Linkages in Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 18, Issue 1, 61-75
Kiribamune J. (2012). Development strategies for remote rural regions: what do we know so far? Paper presented at the OECD International Conference on Remote Rural Areas-Development through Natural and Cultural Assets, Albarracin, Spain, November 5-6,
Le Roy A. (1997). Les activités de service: une chance pour les économies rurales? Vers de nouvelles logiques de développement rural, Paris, L’Harmattan, 250 p.
Marcou G. XVIII (2004). Décentralisation: quelle théorie de l'État?. In: Annuaire des collectivités locales. Tome 24, 2004. Réforme de la décentralisation, réforme de l'État. Régions et villes en Europe. pp. 235-252 ;doi : https://doi.org/10.3406/coloc.2004.1541 https://www.persee.fr/doc/coloc_0291-4700_2004_num_24_1_1541
Mayoux, E.M. (2010). Role of women in agricultural development and their constraints: A case study of Biliri Local Government Area, Gombe State, Nigeria. Pak. J. Nutr., 6, 676–680.
Mbanga L. A. (2020). Institutions and local development: Analysing experiences in Mezam Division, North West Region, Cameroon. African Journal of social SCIENCES. 11(6) 2020-25.
Mbanga L. A. (2003). Local Associations and Rural Development in Ndop Central Sub
Division, North West Province, Cameroon. Maîtrise Dissertation, Department of
Geography, FALSS, The University of Yaounde I, 156p.
MINADER. (2003). “Cameroon Compressive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis ( CFSVA).UN Food Program”. Via CesareGiulio VIOLA 68, Parrcode Medici 00148, Rome Italy.
Moser M. N. (2016). Empowering Rural Women: Issues, Opportunities and Approaches; Women Press: Toronto, on,Canada, 2005.
Moser M. N. (2016). Role of Rural Women in Agricultural Development and their Constraints.J. Agric. Soc. Sci, 6, 53–56.
Ngalim. A. N. (2016). Cattle Rearing Systems in the North West Region of Cameroon: Historical Trends on Changing Techniques and Strategies.Journal of Educational Policy and Entrepreneurial Research (JEPER)ISSN: 2408-770X (Print), ISSN: 2408-6231(Online)Vol. 2, N0.5. May 2015. Pp 175-189.
Ofei-Aboagye E. (2000). Promoting the participation of women in local governance and development: The case of Ghana. European Centre for Development Policy Management Maastricht, 11 p.
Quisumbing W.H. (2014). Agriculture and rurality: beginning the “final separation”? Rural Sociologie. 67(3):350–371.
Rabarivelo S. A (2017). Impact de la décentralisation sur le développement local à Madagascar. Mémoire de maitrise en Sciences Sociales à l’Université Antananarivo, 63 p.
Roig C. (1996). Théorie et réalité de la décentralisation. In Revue française de science politique, 16e année, n°3, 1966.
pp44571;doi :https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.1966.392937https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsp_0035 2950_1966_num_16_3_392937
Saquina S. M. (2015). Women in farming and income earning: Study of a Gazipur village. J. Rural Dev. Bangladesh, 25, 79–98.
Sékou C. D. (2008). Décentralisation et programmes de développement en Guinée: la stratégie de communication des agents de développement communautaires dans la CRD de Diari dans la préfecture de Labé (Guinée).
Smith D. P. (2014). “neglected side of the work-family interface” Antecedents of positive and negative family-to-work spillover. J. Fam. Issues, 28, 242–262.
Spindel M. R. (2010). Women’s Work in Third World Agriculture: Concepts and Indicators; International Labour Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.
Sweetman M. G. (2016). Female Labour Force Participation Rates in Rural Pakistan: Some Fundamental Explanations and Policy Implications (with Comments). Pak. Dev. Rev, 26, 687–697.
Taylor, G. (2013). Review of Evaluation Approaches and Methods Used by Interventions on Women and Girls’ Economic Empowerment; Overseas Development Institute: London, UK, 2014.
Tibaijuka. M. K. (2015). Social inequalities in health and nutrition in selected states. Econ. Political Wkly, 39, 677–683.
Tubah Council/PNDP (2017) Tubah council updates. No 1, July-September. Quarterly newsletter, Bamenda II council and the National Community Driven Programme.
UNO (2018). Rethinking the causes of deforestation: Lessons from economic models.World Bank Res Obs. 2018, 14, 73–98.
UNO (2015). United nations Organisation.(2012). “Incorporating Nutritional Consideration when Addressing Food insecurity”. Journal of food Security, 1(4), 431-440
Yemelong Temgoua N. (2021). Quand la diaspora féminine du département des Bamboutos à l’Ouest du Cameroun utilise ses ressources pour développer leurs villages d’origine. In Actes du Colloque-symposium international femme et développement en afrique subsaharienne : regards et actions croisés, pp 97-105.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nadine Yemelong Temgoua, Jim Narem Kwin Bouyo, Gilbert Zechia Mofor, Mearan Forchop Nahbila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
