INFLUENCE OF PRO ACTIVENESS ON PERFORMANCE OF STATE CORPORATIONS IN KENYA

Authors

  • Dr. Bruno Mugambi Linyiru Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Dr. Rutto Peter Ketyenya Dedan Kimathi University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ijbs.288

Keywords:

pro-activeness, state corporations, performance

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish the influence of pro activeness on performance of state corporations in Kenya.

Methodology: The study adopted an explanatory research design. The population of the research consists of the 187 state corporations in Kenya as at 2013. The unit of analysis was the state corporation. A purposive sample of 55 commercial state corporations was included in the study. The study used primary data gathered using questionnaires.

Results: Results indicated that pro-activeness is a key determinant of firm performance for commercial state corporations in Kenya.

Policy recommendation: The study recommended that state corporation steps up to promote pro-activeness among its employees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dr. Bruno Mugambi Linyiru, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Doctor

Dr. Rutto Peter Ketyenya, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology

Doctorate student

References

Agca, V. Topal, Y. and Kaya, H. (2009). Linking Intrapreneurship activities to multidimensional firm performance in Turkish manufacturing firms: an empirical study, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-19

Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: 103rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (part 2) (20-50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Covin, J. ., & Slevin, D. . (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behaviour. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7-25.

Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T. & Eisner A.B. (2007). Strategic Management: Text and Cases, 3rd Ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Lumpkin, G. T. Cogliser, C. C. and Schneider, D. R (2009). Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: An Entrepreneurial Orientation Perspective, Entrepreneurship and Theory in Practice, 33(1), 47-69

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management review, 135-172.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance. The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451.

Lwamba, N.M, Bwisa, H & Sakwa, M. (2014). Exploring the Effect of Corporate Entrepreneurship on Financial Performance of Firms: Evidence from Kenya's Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.Vol. 4, No. 1

Mang'unyi, E. (2011). Ownership structure and Corporate Governance and its effects on performance: A case of selected Banks in Kenya. International Journal of Business Administration. 2(3)

Mayaka, C. (2006). Safaricom Limited (A) Crafting Business and Marketing Strategy for a New Market. Nairobi: School of Business Unites States International University.

Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of Entrepreneurship in three types of firms, Management Science, 29:770-791

Miring'u, A. & Muoria, E. (2011). An analysis of the effect of Corporate Governance on performance of Commercial State Corporations in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Public Management,1(1)

Mokaya, S. (2012). Corporate entrepreneurship and organizational performance,Theoretical perspectives approaches and outcomes. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 1(4), 133-143.

Mugenda, O.M. & Mugenda, A.G. (2003). Research Methods: Quantitative and QualitativeApproaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies

Ongore, V.O & K'obonyo, P.O. (2011). Effects of Selected Corporate Governance Characteristics on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Kenya, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011, pp.99-12

Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. (5th Edition). London: Prentice Hall.

Wang, C. L. (2008). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance, Entrepreneurship and Theory in Practice, 32(4), 635-654

Wiklund J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small an medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1307-1314.

Zahra, S. A. & Garvis, D. M. (2000). International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environment Hostility, Journal of Business Venturing 15, 469-492.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-29

How to Cite

Linyiru, D. B. M., & Ketyenya, D. . R. P. (2017). INFLUENCE OF PRO ACTIVENESS ON PERFORMANCE OF STATE CORPORATIONS IN KENYA. International Journal of Business Strategies, 2(2), 21 35. https://doi.org/10.47672/ijbs.288

Issue

Section

Articles