The Moderating Effect of Firm Characteristics on the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Business Enterprises in Uganda

Authors

  • John Rwakihembo Mountains of the Moon University
  • Peter Oceng Mountains of the Moon University
  • John Baguma Kule Mbarara University of Science and Technology
  • Nixon Kamukama Mbarara University of Science and Technology
  • Nsambu Fredrick Kijjambu Faculty of Business and Management Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ijbs.2098

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to establish the moderating effect of firm characteristics on the relationship between corporate governance and the financial performance of companies in Uganda.

Materials and Methods: The study applied a positivist paradigm and a cross-sectional design. Data were obtained from a sample of 394 private companies drawn from central and western Uganda. Companies were stratified by region, sectors, and subsectors; and then selected using simple random sampling from each stratum. A structured questionnaire was distributed to board members, Chief Executive Officers, accountants, Internal Auditors, and managers who were selected purposively. Principle Component Analysis and varimax rotation were employed for data extraction and reduction. The hierarchical regression technique was employed for data analysis.

Findings: The study results confirmed firm characteristics moderate the relationship between corporate governance and the financial performance of companies in Uganda. The interaction term was found to be enhancing, with the moderator strengthening the effect of corporate governance on financial performance.

Implications to Practice and Policy: From the results, it is deduced that besides ensuring an effective governance system, managers and owners of private limited companies should pay more attention to enhancing firm attributes such as size, age, and reputation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiken. L.S. and West S.G. (1991). Multiple Regression. Testing and Interpreting Regressions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Agrawal, A., and Knoeber, C. R. (2016), the financial performance of a firm and Mechanisms for Controlling Agency Problem: Quantitative Financial Analysis Journal,31(03), 377-397.

Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S.A., and Reeb, D.M. (2014), “Board characteristic, accounting reports’ integrity, and cost of debt’, International Journal of Accounting and econ, 37(3),315-342.Accounting

Ansong, A. (2017). Managerial competence and financial performance of SMEs: the contingent role of stakeholder engagement. EuroMed Journal of Management, 2(1), 2-14.

Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in Social-psychological research. Strategic, Conceptual, and statistical considerations. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1173-1182).

Berger, A. and Udell, G. (2012), Economics of Business Finance: The Role of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6), 613-673.

Bolo D, Muchemi A.W, and Ogutu M., (2011), Diversity of Top Management teams and effects on corporate performance. PJ Business Admin. Manage, 1(3) pp 80-95

Boone, A. L., Casares Field, L., Karpoff, J. M., and Raheja, C. G. (2017), Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Composition: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101

Borghesi, R., Houston, J., and Naranjo, A. (2017), Value, Survival, and the Evolution of Firm Organizational Structure. Financial Management, 36(3), 5-31.

Christofi, M., Ηadjielias, E., Hughes, M., & Plakoyiannaki, E. (2021). Advancing Research Methodologies in Management Scholarship. “. British Journal of Management, 32(3), E1-E5.

Cuevas-Rodriguez G., Gomez-Mejia L.R and Wiseman R.M. (2012),” Has Agency theory run its course? Making the theory more flexible to inform management of reward systems”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 20 No.6.

Durnev, A. and Kim, E. (2005), To Steal or Not to Steal: Firm Attributes, Legal Environment and Valuation. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1461-1493

Field, A. (2006), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd Edition), Sage, London Financial Institutions Act of Uganda (2004)

Fombrun, C. J., and Shanley, M. (2010), Firm reputation and corporate strategy. Academy of Mgt Journal, 33, 233–258.

Haat, M.H.C., Mahenthiran, S, and Rahman, R.A., (2018), ‘Governance, transparency and financial performance of companies in Malaysia’, International Journal of managerial auditing, 23,8, (744–778)

Heenetigala, K. and Armstrong, A. (2011), ‘Corporate governance and financial performance in a dynamic political and economic environment: A case of Sri Lanka’, Financial Markets and Corporate Governance Conference, 2012, Australia

Hill, C.W.L., and Jones, T.M. (2012), “The Stakeholders-agency theory,” Journal of mgt studies, 29(2),131-154.

Himmelberg, C.P, Hubbard, R.G. and Palia, D. (2013), “Understanding determinants of managerial ownership and a link between ownership and performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3),353-384.

Imam, M.O., and Malik, M. (2017), ‘Corporate governance and financial performance: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh stock market’, Review of Research Papers in Business, 3(4), 88–110.

Jose E.P (2013). Doing Statistical Mediation and Moderation. New York: NY: Guildford Press.

Maina. E. K, Gachunga. H, Muturi. W and Ogutu. M (2017). Influence of firm Characteristics on

The Impact of Disclosure and Transparency in the Performance of Companies Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, Vol.5(9), pp 6994-7007.

Mutende E.A., Mwangi M., Njihia J.M, and Ochieng D.E (2017). The Moderating role of firm Characteristics of the relationship between free cash flows and the financial performance of firms listed on the Nairobi Stock Exchange. Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, Vol 6, No.4, 2017,55-74.

Nenova, T. (2013), The Value of Corporate Voting Rights and Control: A Cross- Country Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(3), 325-351.

Nihat. M. and Demir. s. N (2016). “The role of Firm Characteristics on the relationship between Gender Diversity and Financial performance,” Management Decision, Vol. 54, Lss 6pp. 1407-1419.

Ondigo H. (2019). The moderating effect of firm characteristics on the relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya. International Journal of Current Science and Interdisciplinary Research, Vol 2 (12).

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., and Podsakoff, N. P. (2012), Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology,63(1), 539-569. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Sengur, E.D. (2011), ‘Do CGIs of companies outperform others? Empirical evidence from Turkey’, International Business and Social Sciences Journal, 2(14),254-260.

Tabachnick B. G., and Fidell. L.S. (2001), Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th Edition, New York, Harper Collins

Uganda Bureau of Statistics (2016) Statistical Abstract

Yamane. T. (1973), Statistics: An introductory Analysis, 3rd Edition, Harper and Row, New York, NY

Zalaghi. H, Godini. M. and Mansouri. K (2019). The Moderating Role of Firm Characteristics on the Relationship Between Working Capital Management and Financial Performance. IA University of Arak, Iran, 4(1),71-88

Zuckweiler, K. M., Rosacker, K. M., & Hayes, S. K. (2016). Business students’ perceptions of corporate governance best practices. Corporate Governance, 16(2), 361-376.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-14

How to Cite

Rwakihembo, J., Oceng, P., Kule, J. B., Kamukama, N., & Kijjambu, N. F. (2024). The Moderating Effect of Firm Characteristics on the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Business Enterprises in Uganda. International Journal of Business Strategies, 10(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.47672/ijbs.2098

Issue

Section

Articles