The Use of Assistive Technology Devices and Its Effects on the Academic Achievement of Pupils with Visual Impairment in Some Inclusive Schools in Bamenda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ejt.2607Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed at investigating the use of assistive technology devices and its effects on the academic achievement of pupils with visual impairment in some inclusive schools in Bamenda. Three specific objectives were raised: To examine the use of mobile phones, audiobooks and screen magnifiers and its effects on the academic achievement of pupils with visual impairments in inclusive schools within Bamenda. From the objective of the study, research questions were formulated for guidance. Three theories were highlighted; Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory (1936) B.F. Skinner's Operant Conditioning theory (1938), and Lev Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development (1970).
Materials and Methods: The study adopted a mixed method with the concurrent nested research design for data collection. Questionnaire and interview guide instruments were used to measure the effects of assistive technology on academic achievement of pupils in inclusive schools. The researcher used a four range Likert Scale such as Strongly Agree (SA) = 4, Agree (A) = 3, Disagree (D) = 2 and Strongly Disagree (SD) = 1 for the teachers to choose. The questionnaires were structured in closed ended for the teachers and open ended interview guide for the pupils. The responses were analyzed with the used of simple descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages).
Findings: The results from the hypothetical perspective, findings show that, there is a significant effect on the use of assistive technology devices on the academic achievements of pupils with visual impairments in inclusive schools. The use of mobile phones shows that the calculated P-value is less than 0.05and retain the null hypothesis if P-value is greater than 0.005. Findings reveal that, considering the t-value the result are significant (p=0.000). Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative which state that mobile phones has a significant effect on the academic achievements of pupils with visual impairments in inclusive schools in Bamenda with (R Square)=0.268 and p=0.00. Audiobooks significantly affected the academic achievements of pupils with visual impairments, given (R Square)= 0282 and p=0.00. same with a significant positive effect of screen magnifiers with a coefficient determinate of ( R Square)=0.049 and p-0.007.It was concluded that assistive technology devices are useful and a supportive tool for both teachers and learners in the teaching learning process.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy : Recommendations were made to teachers and parents to make efforts to carry out continuous training with adequate knowledge in the use of assistive technology to better equip the learners. The government should subsidize the purchase of assistive device and draw up policies that will affect the implementation of inclusive education hitch free. Furthermore, suggestions for further research were made, asking other researchers to broaden the scope to get a larger sample size.
Downloads
References
Adedoyin, O., & Soykan, E. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of online learning resources for the development of learning competencies among students. Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 189-205.
Al Lily, A. E., Ismail, A. F., Abunasser, F. M., Alqahtani, R., & Watfa, M. (2020). Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture. Technology in Society, 63, 101317.
Alkahtani, K. (2013). Teachers’ Knowledge and Use of Assistive Technology for Students with Special Educational Needs. Journal of Studies in Education, vol. 3 (2), pp. 65-86.
Almekhalfi, A. & Tibi, S. (2012). The use of Assistive Technology for people with special needs in the UAE. Journal of International Special Needs Education, vol. 15 (1), pp. 56-71.
AlnahdI, G. (2014). Assistive Technology in Special Education and the Universal Design for Learning. TOJET the Turkish online journal of educational technology, vol. 13 (2), pp.18-23.
Al-Samarraie, H., Lundqvist, K. O., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2019). The effect of mobile learning on students’ learning behaviours and outcomes: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 128, 37–53.
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97.
Artino, A. R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1(2), 76–85.
Assistive Technology Industry Association. (2015). What is AT? [online]. [Accessed 15 August 2020]. Available at: https://www.atia.org/home/atresources/what-is-at/
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115.
Best, J. W. & Kahn, J. V. (2006) Research in education. 10th edn. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.
Boyle, J. R. & Joyce, R. L. (2019). Using Smartpens to Support Note-Taking Skills of Students with Learning Disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, vol. 55 (2), pp. 86–93.
Carstens, A.-M. C. (1996). Differentiation in student responses to literature based on auditory versus visual exposure. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED415524.
Cauley, F., Aiken, K., & Whitney, L. (2009). Technologies across our curriculum: A study of technology integration
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. 8th edn. London; New York: Routledge.pg. 70
Coleman, M. (2011). Successful Implementation of Assistive Technology to Promote Access to Curriculum and Instruction for Students with Physical Disabilities. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, vol. 30 (2), pp. 2-22.
Combs, D. (2014). New research on assistive technologies: uses and limitations. New York: Nova Publishers.
Conard-Salvo, T. & Spartz, J.M. (2012). Listening to Revise: What a Studyabout Text-to-Speech Software Taught Us about Students' Expectations forTechnology Use in the Writing Center. The Writing center journal, vol. 32 (2),pp. 40-59.
Cook A, & Hussey SM. (2002). Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 2nd edn. St. Louis: Mosby.
De Witte, L., Steel, E., Gupta, S., Ramos, V. & Roentgen, U. (2018). Assistive technology provision: towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, vol. 13 (5), pp. 467-472.
Elewekere, J. (2007). Strategies for enhancing inclusive education. School of teacher education and leadership, department of special education, Radford University. Retrieved from the punch newspaper on May 11th 2007 from http//www.google.com/ng/govt.x?alNG/iu
Fajry, K., Komariah, E., & Silvianti, T. M. (2016). Audio book: Teaching listening comprehension. Research in English and Education (READ), 1(1), 62–70.
Feyerer, E., Miesenberger, K. & Wohlhart, D. (2002). ICT and AssistiveTechnology in Teachers Education and Training. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 107-114.
Fichten, Asuncion, and Scapin. (2014) Successful Implementation of Assistive Technology to Promote Access to Curriculum and Instruction for Students with Physical Disabilities. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, vol. 30 (2), pp. 2-22.
Fischer, S., Barnes, R.K. & Kilpatrick, S. (2017). Equipping parents to support their children’s higher education aspirations: a design and evaluation tool. Educational review (Birmingham), vol. 71 (2), pp. 198-217.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. 6th edn. Los Angeles:SAGE.
Floyd, K.K. & Judge, S.L. (2012). The Efficacy of Assistive Technology on Reading Comprehension for Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, vol. 8 (1), pp. 48-64.
Hopkins, J. (2006). Assistive technology: Ten things to know. Library Media Connection,25(1), 12-14. https://www.edutopia.org/assistive technology for young children.
IDEA (2004). Special education. Contemporary perspectives for school professionals PearsonEducation, Inc. USA
Judge, S. (2000). Accessing and funding assistive technology for young children with disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28(2), 125-131.
Kuyini, A. B. (2010, April 4). Inclusive education in Ghana: Are we achieving the vision? GhanaWeb.https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/features/Inclusive-Edcuation-In-Ghana-Are-We-Achieving-The-Vision-179726https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/features/Inclusive-Edcuation-In-Ghana-Are-We-Achieving-The-Vision-179726
Laary, D. (2016, March 9). Ghana: Mobile phone penetration soars to 128%. The Africa Report. https://www.theafricareport.com/1800/ghana-mobile-phone-penetration-soars-to-128/https://www.theafricareport.com/1800/ghana-mobile-phone-penetration-soars-to-128/
Lauren, E.& Brdar, K. (2019). Assistive technology. The benefits of video medicated instruction.
McCarthy, M. M (2000). Inclusion of children with disabilities: seeking the appropriate balance. Guildford: McGraw-Hill.
McDonald, R., Pettersson, C. & Scherer, M. (2018). Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, vol. 13 (5), pp. 437-444.
Merbler, J., Hadadian, A., & Ulman, J. (1999). Using assistive technology in the inclusive classroom. Preventing School Failure, 43(3), 113-120.
Nugaret, A. A., Scruggs, T.E. & Mastropieri, M.A. (2005). Does teacher education produce better special education teachers? Exceptional Children Journal. 71 (3). 217- 229.
Sikanku, S. T. (2018). Challenges in teaching pupils with visual impairments in inclusive classrooms: The experience of Ghanaian teachers. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(11). www.iiste.orgwww.iiste.org
Türker, S. (2010). The effectiveness of audiobooks on the reading comprehension of selected texts by the university EFL students at different proficiency levels [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Watson, S., & Johnston, L. (2007). Assistive technology in the inclusive science classroom.
Wolfson, G. (2008). Using audiobooks to meet the needs of adolescent readers. American Secondary Education, 36(2), 105–117.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ambei Moses Chu (PhD), Nyambi Caroline Lema Nanga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.