Selection of an Appropriate Particulate Matter (PM) Separation Device for a Proposed Waste Incineration Plant

Authors

  • Noah Yakah Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana
  • Augustine Akuoko Kwarteng Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana
  • Cyrus Addy Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana
  • Michael Yirenkyi Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana
  • Jonas Aklie Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ejt.2110

Keywords:

Waste Energy, Municipal Solid Waste, Particulate Matter, Cyclone, Fabric Filter, Electrostatic Precipitators

Abstract

Purpose: Waste incineration facilities are the most widely used Waste to Energy (WtE) technology employed in developed economies in the disposal and management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). A major drawback of waste incineration facilities is the enormous volume of toxic emissions emitted from these facilities. Particulate Matter (PM) is a complex combination of either solid or liquid particulates produced from the combustion of MSW that are suspended in the air. These particles which are carcinogenic are therefore required to be separated from the emissions from the waste incineration plants prior to its emission into the atmosphere.

Materials and Methods: The cyclone, fabric filter, and Electrostatic Precipitators are typical PM separation devices that are employed in conventional coal-fired power generation plants. The adoption of these devices in waste incineration plants therefore require studies to select an appropriate one for use. In this study various models of the waste incineration plants were simulated using the Aspen Plus software aim at selecting an appropriate PM separation device for use in a proposed waste incineration plant in Ghana.

Findings: The study concluded that the fabric filter and the ESP are the optimum PM separation devices, achieving an overall separation efficiency of 99.54% and 99.45 % respectively for all particle sizes. The fabric filter was therefore, adopted for use in the proposed waste incineration plant.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: It is recommended, however, that a techno-economic analysis is performed on the use of the fabric filter and ESP in the proposed waste incineration facility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cooper, (1994). David Cooper and F. Alley, Air Pollution Control: A Design Approach, 2nd Edition, Waveland Press, Prospects Heights, IL, 1994.

Enviraj (2018), Available online: https://Enviraj|Electrostatic Precipitator (accessed on 11 April 2023).

EPA (1998), US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, “Stationary Source control Techniques, Document for Fine Particulate Matter”, EPA-452/R-97-001, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 1998.

Gawali, Snehal and Madhao B. Bhambere (2014), “EFFECT OF DESIGN AND THE OPERATING PARAMETERS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF CYCLONE SEPARATOR — A REVIEW”.

Han Z., Liu Y., Zhong M., Shi G., Li Q., Zeng D., Zhang Y., Fei Y., and Xie Y. (2018) “Influencing Factors of Domestic Waste Characteristics in Rural Areas of Developing Countries”, Waste Manag. 2018, 72, 45–54.

Kaza Silpa, Yao Lisa C., Bhada-Tata Perinaz, and Van Woerden Frank (2018), “What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050” Urban Development, Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank.

Miller B.G. (2010), “Advanced Flue Gas Dedusting Systems and Filters for Ash and Particulate Emissions Control in Power Plants”, Editor(s): Dermot Roddy, In Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, Advanced Power Plant Materials, Design and Technology, Woodhead Publishing, 2010, Pages 217-243, ISBN 9781845695156, https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845699468.2.217.

Ni M., Leung D. Y. C., Leung M. K. H., and Sumathy K. (2006), “An Overview of Hydrogen Production from Biomass”, Fuel Processing Technology 2006;87(5): 461-472.

Patwa A., Parde D., Dohare D., Vijay R., and Kumar R. (2020), “Solid Waste Characterization and Treatment Technologies in Rural Areas: An Indian and International Review”, Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101066 doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101066

Solheimslid, T., Harneshaug, H. K. and Lümmen, N. (2015), “Calculation of First-Law and Second -Law Efficiency of a Norwegian Combined Heat and Power Facility Driven by Municipal Waste Incineration: A Case Study” Energy Conversion and Management 2015;95:149 - 159.

The World Bank (1999), “Municipal Solid Waste Incineration: Technical Guidance Report; Technical Report”; The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; Available at https://goo.gl/kABenL (Accessed on 20 October 2020).

Vatavuk W. M. (1990), “Estimating Cost of Air Pollution Control”, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1990.

World Energy Resources Council (2016), Available online: “World-Energy-Resources-Full-report-2016.10.03.pdf (worldenergy.org)” (accessed on 20 April 2021).

Yakah, Noah, Imtisal-e- Noor, Andrew Martin, Anthony Simons, and Mahrokh Samavati. 2022. "Wet Flue Gas Desulphurization (FGD) Wastewater Treatment Using Membrane Distillation" Energies 15, no. 24: 9439. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249439

Zukeran A., et al., (1999), "Collection Efficiency of Ultrafine Particles by an Electrostatic Precipitator under DC and Pulse Operating Modes" in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1184-1191, Sept.-Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1109/28.793383.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Yakah, N., Kwarteng, A. A., Addy, C., Yirenkyi, M., & Aklie, J. (2024). Selection of an Appropriate Particulate Matter (PM) Separation Device for a Proposed Waste Incineration Plant. European Journal of Technology, 8(3), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.47672/ejt.2110

Issue

Section

Articles