Kant’s Theory of Human Transcendence (Ontology) and its Pitfalls

Authors

  • Rev. Fr. Dr. Joseph T. Ekong, O.P, Ph.D

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ejpcr.1169
Abstract views: 88
PDF downloads: 152

Keywords:

Human transcendence, Kant, theory, ontology, pitfalls.

Abstract

Purpose: This work offers a caveat regarding the human propensity to error, even in situations of very meticulous and seemingly thorough philosophical investigations.

Methodology: This paper is a critical, analytic and evaluative, in its exposition of Kant’s ontology.

Findings: Kant already had a theory of the origin of concepts which reinforced his theory of the nature of judgments. Based on his acceptance of the Cartesian psychology of perception, he claimed that man thinks only thoughts and perceives only perceptions; and that the mind is aware only of itself and its own states. The situation puts in relief what finally is an issue between a theory which is pinned to a belief in an absolute beyond history and behind experience, and one which is frankly experimental.

Unique Contribution to theory, practice and policy (recommendation): In a manner that is both instructive and corrective, this work contributes to the extant repertoire of discussions on Kant’s ontology. It offers a significantly demanding ratiocinative interrogation of the foundations upon which Kant’s theory of human transcendence was premised or predicated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rev. Fr. Dr. Joseph T. Ekong, O.P, Ph.D

Associate Professor of Philosophy, Dominican University, Ibadan

References

Bunnin, N. and Tsui-James, E. P. (Eds.), (2003) The Blackwell Companion To Philosophy, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Company, 2003.

Cornelius Ryan and Henry Tiblier, (1967) Epistemology. Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company.

Dewey, J. (1920) Reconstruction in Philosophy. NY: Henry Holt and Company.

Findlay, J. N. (1981), Kant and the Transcendental Object: A Hermeneutic Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gelven, M. (1970), A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time. New York, Evanston: Harper and Row.

Heidegger, M. (1962) Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Bloomington, London: Indiana University Press.

Honderich, T. (1995), Ed. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: University Press.

Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason (trans. N.K. Smith), (London: Macmillan)

Kant, I. (1724-1804). Available at: http://www.friesian.com/kant.htm

Loux, M. J. (1998) Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction, 2nd Edition. New York: Routledge.

Okoro, C. (2001) Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Chapter 3, “Kant’s Ontology.” Plato, The Republic, Book VII, 515c-515e.

Strawson, P. F. (2004), The Bounds of Sense, An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, New York: Routledge

Weldon, T. D. (1958), Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-30

How to Cite

Ekong, J. T. (2022). Kant’s Theory of Human Transcendence (Ontology) and its Pitfalls. European Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion, 6(1), 30 - 42. https://doi.org/10.47672/ejpcr.1169

Issue

Section

Articles