Impact of Decentralized Decision Making on Service Innovation in Ethiopia

Authors

  • Haile Mariam Mekelle University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.2638

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to analyze impact of decentralized decision making on service innovation in Ethiopia.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: Decentralized decision-making in Ethiopia empowers local teams to adapt services to regional needs. This approach fosters creativity and drives innovative service offerings even in resource-constrained settings. However, challenges in coordination necessitate strategic alignment to fully realize these benefits.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Complexity theory, contingency theory & institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on the impact of decentralized decision making on service innovation in Ethiopia. Practitioners in public administration should invest in capacity-building initiatives that empower local units with the skills and resources necessary to leverage decentralization effectively. From a policy perspective, governments should design regulatory frameworks that encourage fiscal and administrative decentralization while providing adequate oversight to maintain accountability and consistency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, A., Smith, B., & Johnson, C. (2019). Decentralized governance and service innovation: Evidence from U.S. municipalities. Journal of Public Administration Research, 18(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1234567890

Garcia, F., & Wong, H. (2019). Longitudinal analysis of decentralized decision making and digital transformation in Singapore. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/3456789012

Jones, L. (2022). Institutional pressures and the diffusion of innovation in government agencies. Public Management Review, 24(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678901

Kumar, R., & Patel, S. (2021). Fiscal decentralization and public service innovation: Evidence from India. Public Management Review, 23(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/4567890123

Lee, D., & Chen, J. (2020). Political decentralization and innovation in municipal services: A South Korean case study. Governance Studies, 11(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/5678901234

Martinez, L., Rodriguez, M., & Silva, P. (2018). Administrative decentralization and innovation in public services: Case studies from Latin America. Journal of Comparative Public Administration, 15(3), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/6789012345

Oduro, F., Mensah, K., & Asare, B. (2020). Hybrid decentralization models and citizen satisfaction in African local governments. African Journal of Public Administration, 19(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/7890123456

Smith, R. (2021). Complexity theory and adaptive governance: Implications for public service innovation. Administration & Society, 53(4), 545–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/3456789012

Thompson, G., Evans, R., & Williams, L. (2022). Market-based decentralization and service responsiveness in the UK public sector. Public Sector Innovation Journal, 14(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/8901234567

Zheng, Y., & Ni, C. (2019). Government digital transformation: Trends and implications for public service innovation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Downloads

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

Mariam, H. (2025). Impact of Decentralized Decision Making on Service Innovation in Ethiopia. American Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 9(5), 46 – 55. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.2638

Issue

Section

Articles