Effect of Policy Network Individual Actors' Characteristics on Policy Process Outcomes in the Road Transport Sector in Nairobi City County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajppa.1330Keywords:
Network collaboration, policy process, policy outcomes, road transport sector, KenyaAbstract
Purpose: Public policy making process in the transport sector in Nairobi City County, Kenya faces a myriad of challenges as reflected in the high failure rate of most of the policies. Often ignored are the characteristics of individual actors within a policy network which can have a major impact on the public policy process by shaping how the policy is framed, negotiated, and implemented. Considering the increasing challenges in the policy making process and considering the importance of individual actor's characteristics in this process, this study sought to establish the effect of policy network individual actors' characteristics on policy process outcomes in the road transport sector in Nairobi City County, Kenya.
Methodology: The study adopted a descriptive research design. The target population of the study was 470 policy actors in the road transport sector within Nairobi City County out of which 407 were purposefully sampled to respond to the questionnaire and 45 were sampled to participate in focused group discussions as well as key informant interviews. A mixed methodology was adopted whereby both quantitative and qualitative data was collected through structured questionnaires, key informant interviews and focused group discussions. The quantitative data was analyzed through descriptive statistics that is mean, frequencies and percentages as well as regression analysis. On the other hand, qualitative data was analysed through thematic analysis and reported in a narrative format.
Findings: The study established that characteristics of individual actors within a policy network can significantly influence public policy processes outcomes by shaping how the policy is framed, how it is negotiated, and how it is implemented.
Recommendations: The study recommends a need to increase the influence of individual actors within the policy network by providing them with more opportunities, resources and necessary support to engage in decision-making processes. There is also a need for involved stakeholders in the policy making process in the transport sector in Nairobi City County to create a platform for individual actors to share their opinions, experiences, and perspectives on relevant policy issues. The study further recommends the involved stakeholders in the policy making process in the transport sector in Nairobi City County to provide resources and support to individual actors in order to strengthen their capacity and knowledge in policy making processes.
Downloads
References
Anderson, S. E., DeLeo, R. A., & Taylor, K. (2019). Policy entrepreneurs, legislators, and agenda setting: information and influence. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 587-611.
Aviram, F. N., Beeri, I., & Cohen, N. (2020). Entrepreneurship in the policy process: Linking behavior and context through a systematic review of the policy entrepreneurship literature. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 188-197.
Botterill, L. C. (2013). Are policy entrepreneurs really decisive in achieving policy change? Drought policy in the USA and Australia. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 59(1), 97-112.
Brouwer, S. (2018). Policy entrepreneurs and strategies for change. Regional Environmental Change, 18(5), 1259-1272.
Cairney, P. (2018). Three habits of successful policy entrepreneurs. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 199-215.
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2018). The role of policy entrepreneurs in open government data policy innovation diffusion: An analysis of Australian Federal and State Governments. Government Information Quarterly, 35(1), 123-134.
DeLeo, R. A. (2018). Indicators, agendas and streams: analysing the politics of preparedness. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 27-45.
Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 114-125.
Fischer, M. (2017). Institutions and policy networks in Europe. Oxford handbook of political networks, 833-854.
Hoffmann, S., Weyer, J., & Longen, J. (2017). Discontinuation of the automobility regime? An integrated approach to multi-level governance. Transportation Research part A: policy and practice, 103, 391-408.
Kapucu, N., Hu, Q., & Khosa, S. (2017). The state of network research in public administration. Administration & Society, 49(8), 1087-1120.
Leifeld, P., & Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 731-744.
Lubell, M., Robins, G., & Wang, P. (2014). Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games. Ecology and society, 19(4).
Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238-251.
Onkangi, E., & Muna, W. Networks And Their Role In Management Of Healthcare Systems In Kenya. Kenyatta University
Poku-Boansi, M., & Marsden, G. (2018). Bus rapid transit systems as a governance reform project. Journal of transport geography, 70, 193-202.
Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy sciences, 21(2), 129-168.
Shrestha, M. K. (2013). Self-organizing network capital and the success of collaborative public programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 307-329.
Teklewold, H., Mekonnen, A., & Kohlin, G. (2019). Climate change adaptation: a study of multiple climate-smart practices in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Climate and Development, 11(2), 180-192.
United Nations (2020). Sustainable Development Goal 16: Focus on public institutions, World Public Sector Report 2019, Division for Public Institutions and Digital Government, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York
Van der Heijden, J. (2019). Studying urban climate governance: Where to begin, what to look for, and how to make a meaningful contribution to scholarship and practice. Earth System Governance, 1, 100005.
Veeneman, W., & Mulley, C. (2018). Multi-level governance in public transport: Governmental layering and its influence on public transport service solutions. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 430-437.
World Bank (2014). Formulating an Urban Transport Policy: Choosing between Options. Washington, DC. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20950
World Bank (2017). World Development Report 2017: Governance and the Law. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0950-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cornelius Ombagi, Prof. David Minja, Dr. Wilson Muna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
