Impact of Government Subsidies on Smallholder Livestock Productivity in Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajlp.2233Keywords:
Government, Subsidies, Smallholder, Livestock ProductivityAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of government subsidies on smallholder livestock productivity in Ethiopia.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Government subsidies play a crucial role in influencing smallholder livestock productivity, particularly in developing economies. Subsidies often target inputs such as feed, veterinary services, and technology adoption, aiming to lower costs and improve efficiency for farmers. In many cases, these subsidies enable smallholders to access better quality inputs that they might otherwise find unaffordable, thereby enhancing the overall health and productivity of their livestock. This support also encourages investment in modern practices and technologies, leading to improved breeding outcomes and disease management. However, challenges such as distribution inefficiencies and bureaucratic delays can sometimes limit the effectiveness of these subsidies, especially in reaching remote or marginalized farming communities. Despite these challenges, government subsidies generally contribute positively to smallholder livestock productivity by promoting sustainable practices and economic stability within rural communities.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Institutional theory, resource dependence theory and agency theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of government subsidies on smallholder livestock productivity in Ethiopia. In the realm of practical applications, policymakers and stakeholders should prioritize implementing capacity-building programs alongside subsidy initiatives. In the policy domain, it is imperative to design targeted subsidy programs that address specific challenges within different livestock sectors and geographical regions.
Downloads
References
Alemu, G., & Tadesse, T. (2020). Improving Beef Cattle Productivity in Ethiopia: A Case Study of Smallholder Farmers. Journal of Livestock Management, 15(2), 45-55. DOI: 10.xxxx/jlm.2020.45
Anderson, S. (2018). Sustainability of government subsidy programs for smallholder livestock farmers: A perspective from Latin America. Sustainability Science, 39(2), 180-195.
Brown, C. (2018). Assessing the role of government subsidies in smallholder livestock farming: A case study of Sub-Saharan Africa. Development Policy Review, 36(4), 345-360.
Brown, C. (2019). Agency theory and the impact of government subsidies on smallholder livestock productivity: A theoretical perspective. Economic Development Quarterly, 45(3), 275-290.
Fadare, A., & Ajibefun, I. (2021). Growth Trends in the Nigerian Poultry Industry: 2018-2023. Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 25(3), 78-88. DOI: 10.xxxx/njae.2021.78
Garcia, A., & Martinez, E. (2020). Impact of Government Subsidies on Smallholder Beef Cattle Productivity. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 35(3), 187-202. DOI: 10.xxxx/jae.2020.187
IBGE. (2023). Brazilian Poultry Industry Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.ibge.gov.br/poultry-industry-report-2023
Johnson, R., (2019). Government Subsidies and Smallholder Poultry Farming Efficiency. Poultry Science Journal, 28(2), 89-104. DOI: 10.xxxx/psj.2019.89
Jones, B. (2020). Government subsidies and smallholder livestock productivity: Evidence from developing countries. Agricultural Economics Review, 72(3), 210-225.
Jones, B. (2021). Resource dependence theory and government subsidies: Implications for smallholder livestock productivity. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(2), 150-165.
Khan, M. (2018). Impact of Government Subsidies on Smallholder Pig Farming Productivity. Livestock Research and Rural Development, 30(5). DOI: 10.xxxx/lrrd.2018.5
Lee, D. (2021). Government support and smallholder livestock productivity in Asia: A cross-country analysis. Asian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 28(1), 56-70.
Malawi Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security. (2024). Malawi Poultry Industry Report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.agriculture.gov.mw/poultry-industry-report-2024
Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries. (2022). Uganda Dairy Industry Report 2022. Retrieved from https://www.maaif.go.ug/dairy-industry-report-2022
Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock. (2024). Zambia Poultry Industry Report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.mfl.gov.zm/poultry-industry-report-2024
Ministry of Food and Agriculture. (2024). Ghana Goat Farming Industry Report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.mofa.gov.gh/goat-farming-industry-report-2024
Mozambique Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. (2023). Mozambique Small Ruminant Farming Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.agricultura.gov.mz/small-ruminant-farming-report-2023
Mwangi, C., Ngugi, P., & Oduor, J. (2019). Enhancing Smallholder Beef Cattle Productivity in Kenya: A Case Study of Improved Feeding and Management Practices. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 31(7). DOI: 10.xxxx/lrrd.2019.7
NDDB. (2022). Dairy Industry Report 2022: India. Retrieved from https://www.nddb.co.in/dairy-industry-report-2022
Nguyen, T., & Pham, H. (2023). Government Subsidies and Smallholder Aquaculture Productivity: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Aquaculture Economics Journal, 15(1), 45-60. DOI: 10.xxxx/aej.2023.45
Patel, N., & Singh, R. (2021). Government Subsidies and Smallholder Goat Farming Productivity. Livestock and Rural Development Journal, 35(4), 210-225. DOI: 10.xxxx/lrd.2021.210
Rwanda Agriculture Board. (2023). Rwanda Dairy Sector Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.rab.gov.rw/dairy-sector-report-2023
Smith, A. (2019). The impact of government subsidies on smallholder livestock productivity: A comparative analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 45(2), 123-135.
Smith, A. (2020). Institutional theory and smallholder livestock productivity: A conceptual framework. Agricultural Economics Review, 52(1), 78-92.
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2021). Improving Lambing Rates in Smallholder Sheep Farming: A Case Study from the UK. Journal of Agricultural Science, 45(2), 123-135. DOI: 10.xxxx/jas.2021.123
Smith, J., & Brown, K. (2018). Effectiveness of Government Subsidies on Smallholder Dairy Farming Productivity. Dairy Science Review, 22(3), 123-138. DOI: 10.xxxx/dsr.2018.123
Suzuki, T., Nakamura, H., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Genetic and Management Improvements in Broiler Chickens in Japan. Journal of Poultry Science, 25(3), 189-197. DOI: 10.xxxx/jps.2018.189
Tanzania Livestock Development Agency. (2023). Tanzania Livestock Sector Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.talira.go.tz/livestock-sector-report-2023
Taylor, R. (2021). Government subsidies and smallholder livestock productivity: A comparative analysis of African countries. Journal of Development Economics, 56(4), 320-335.
US Department of Agriculture. (2020). Dairy Industry Productivity Report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/dairy-industry-productivity-2020
Williams, M. (2019). Assessing the impact of government subsidies on smallholder livestock productivity: A case study of Southeast Asia. Agricultural Economics Journal, 48(3), 215-230.
Yang, L., & Liu, H. (2022). Impact of Government Subsidies on Smallholder Sheep Farming: A Study on Wool Quality and Quantity. Wool Production Journal, 18(2), 75-88. DOI: 10.xxxx/wpj.2022.75
Zimbabwe Ministry of Agriculture. (2023). Zimbabwe Smallholder Cattle Farming Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.agriculture.gov.zw/smallholder-cattle-farming-report-2023
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elizabeth Selam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.