Impact of Environmental Regulations on Sustainable Livestock Farming Practices in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajlp.2232Keywords:
Environmental Regulations, Sustainable, Livestock Farming PracticesAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of environmental regulations on sustainable livestock farming practices in Pakistan.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study indicated that in developed economies, stringent regulations have prompted farms to adopt advanced technologies and management practices. These include precision feeding systems, methane capture technologies, and improved waste management techniques to minimize environmental impact. Compliance with regulations often necessitates substantial investments in infrastructure and operational adjustments, driving farms towards more efficient resource utilization and reduced emissions. Consequently, sustainable practices like rotational grazing, organic feed alternatives, and biodiversity conservation have gained prominence, aligning with regulatory goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preserving natural habitats. Conversely, in developing economies, where regulatory frameworks may be less robust or unevenly enforced, the impact varies. Some regions face challenges in adopting sustainable practices due to limited resources and infrastructure. However, increasing global pressure and partnerships with international organizations are gradually influencing policy frameworks. Initiatives focusing on education, technology transfer, and incentivizing sustainable practices are emerging, aiming to balance agricultural productivity with environmental stewardship.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Environmental policy theory, institutional theory and socio-technical transitions theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of environmental regulations on sustainable livestock farming practices in Pakistan. In terms of practical implementation, promoting technological innovation is key. Collaborating with industry stakeholders to research and develop innovative technologies and practices that facilitate compliance with environmental regulations while enhancing farm productivity and resilience will be crucial. From a policy perspective, enhancing regulatory stringency and incentivizing sustainable practices are paramount.
Downloads
References
Abebe, A., & Tadesse, B. (2021). Vermicomposting: A Sustainable Waste Management Practice for Smallholder Farms in Ethiopia. African Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 18(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.5899/2021/ajsa-00123
Chai, C., & Sutthi, P. (2021). Promoting Sustainable Agriculture: The Role of Environmental Regulations in Thailand. Journal of Environmental Management, 35(4), 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.04.029
Chai, C., & Sutthi, P. (2021). Rotational Grazing Systems: Enhancing Forage Utilization and Soil Health on Thai Farms. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 30(2), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2021.1234567
Garcia, J., & Lopez, M. (2020). Wastewater Treatment on Pig Farms: Compliance with Water Quality Regulations. Journal of Environmental Management, 35(4), 512-527.
Garcia, J., & Lopez, M. (2022). Enhancing Pasture Management: The Impact of Stringent Environmental Regulations in Colombia. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 18(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2022.2016010
Garcia, J., & Lopez, M. (2023). Anaerobic Digestion for Organic Waste Treatment: A Sustainable Practice on Colombian Farms. Journal of Renewable Energy, 50(4), 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.029
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. W. (2021). Socio-Technical Transitions to Sustainability: A Review of Concepts, Theories, and Research Approaches. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 589-605.
Girma, M., & Assefa, D. (2023). Agroforestry Integration in Ethiopian Farming: Trends and Environmental Benefits. Agroforestry Journal, 30(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2023.1567299
Gomez, L., & Martinez, J. (2023). Composting in Argentine Agriculture: Trends and Environmental Benefits. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.04.041
Ibrahim, A., & Ahmed, B. (2022). Holistic Planned Grazing: Enhancing Soil Health and Water Retention on Nigerian Farms. African Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 15(2), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.5899/2022/ajsa-00132
Jones, A. B., & Brown, C. (2019). Environmental Regulations and Sustainable Waste Management in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(2), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.309938
Jones, A. B., & Brown, C. (2020). Sustainable Agriculture Practices on U.S. Dairy Farms. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(2), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.309938
Jones, A. B., & Brown, C. (2021). Environmental Regulations and Sustainable Livestock Farming: A Review of Current Practices. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 28(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2021.2016010
Lynch, T. D. (2020). Environmental Policy Theory: Foundations and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Machumu, G., & Moshi, F. (2020). Rotational Grazing Systems: Improving Forage Quality and Soil Health on Tanzanian Farms. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 25(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2020.1234567
Mwanaidi, Z., & Ngowi, P. (2021). Biogas Production from Agricultural Residues: A Case Study of Sustainable Waste Management in Rural Tanzania. Journal of Renewable Energy, 40(4), 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.029
Mwenda, J., & Njenga, M. (2020). Vermicomposting: A Sustainable Waste Management Practice for Smallholder Farms in Kenya. African Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.5899/2020/ajsd-00038
Ogbe, F., & Okafor, C. (2020). Bio-digesters for Manure Treatment: A Sustainable Waste Management Solution for Livestock Farms in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.5899/2020/jsd-00145
Patel, R., & Gupta, S. (2018). Pesticide Use Regulations and Environmental Sustainability on Beef Cattle Farms. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(3), 321-338.
Patel, R., & Gupta, S. (2022). Community-Based Grazing Schemes: Enhancing Sustainable Pasture Management in Rural India. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 18(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2021.2016010
Perez, M., & Sanchez, G. (2022). Rotational Grazing Systems: Improving Grassland Productivity and Biodiversity in Argentina. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 28(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2022.2016010
Rojas, A., & Martinez, C. (2021). Silvopasture Systems in Colombian Agriculture: Enhancing Biodiversity and Climate Resilience. Agroforestry Journal, 35(3), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2021.1567299
Santos, L., & Costa, M. (2021). Silvopasture Systems in Brazilian Agriculture: Enhancing Biodiversity and Climate Resilience. Agroforestry Journal, 28(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2021.1567299
Scott, W. R. (2019). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. SAGE Publications.
Silva, J., & Oliveira, R. (2022). Biochar Production from Agricultural Residues: A Sustainable Waste Management Practice in Brazilian Farming. Journal of Renewable Energy, 45(4), 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.029
Singh, N., & Sharma, A. (2021). Biogas Production from Agricultural Residues: A Case Study of Sustainable Waste Management in Rural India. Journal of Renewable Energy, 35(4), 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.029
Siri, S., & Phat, P. (2022). Biochar Production from Agricultural Residues: A Sustainable Waste Management Practice in Thai Farming. Journal of Renewable Energy, 45(4), 512-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.029
Smith, D, (2017). Composting in U.S. Agriculture: Trends and Environmental Impacts. Journal of Environmental Management, 54(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.041
Smith, D. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing Environmental Regulations for Sustainable Livestock Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.309938
Smith, D. (2018). Waste Management Regulations on Dairy Farms: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction. Journal of Sustainable Development, 25(3), 245-259.
Smith, D. (2020). Waste Management Policies and Sustainable Farming Practices: A Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Sustainable Development, 25(3), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2020.1234567
Suzuki, T. (2018). Agroforestry Integration in Japanese Farming: Trends and Challenges. Agroforestry Journal, 22(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2018.1567299
Tanaka, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2019). Recycling Systems in Japanese Agriculture: A Case Study of Waste Reduction Measures. Sustainability Science, 7(2), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0553-2
Tanaka, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2022). Biodiversity Conservation Regulations and Land Management on Sheep Farms. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 30(1), 78-92.
Wang, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Economic Implications of Air Pollution Control Regulations on Poultry Farms. Journal of Environmental Economics, 18(3), 112-125.
Wang, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). Precision Agriculture for Efficient Nutrient Management in Chinese Farming: Trends and Impacts. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(2), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.309938
Zhang, L., & Chen, W. (2021). Controlled Grazing Systems: Enhancing Forage Quality and Soil Health in Chinese Agriculture. Agroforestry Journal, 22(1), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2021.1567299
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wasim Aziz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.