Impact of Federal Livestock Subsidies on Small-Scale Ranching in Israel

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of federal livestock subsidies on small-scale ranching in Israel.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: Subsidies are intended to support agricultural producers, including small-scale ranchers, their actual effects vary depending on several factors. Some findings indicate that subsidies often disproportionately benefit larger, industrial-scale operations due to their greater capacity to navigate bureaucratic processes and leverage economies of scale. This can potentially marginalize smaller ranchers, who may struggle to access subsidies or compete with larger competitors who receive more substantial support. Additionally, critics argue that subsidies can distort market dynamics, artificially inflating production levels and encouraging environmentally unsustainable practices. However, proponents of subsidies argue that they are necessary for ensuring food security, stabilizing agricultural markets, and supporting rural economies.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Economic theory of subsidies, sustainable agriculture theory and policy implementation theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of federal livestock subsidies on small-scale ranching in Israel. Identify practical strategies that small-scale ranchers can adopt to mitigate risks associated with fluctuations in subsidy programs. Evaluate the effectiveness of existing livestock subsidy policies and recommend adjustments based on empirical findings.