Livestock Emission Reduction Policies and their Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Peru

Authors

  • Carol Joseph Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajlp.1773

Keywords:

Livestock, Emissions, Policies, Greenhouse & Impact

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore the livestock emission reduction policies and their impact on greenhouse gas emissions in Peru.

Materials and Methods: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings revealed that reveal that these policies hold promise in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions associated with livestock farming, but their effectiveness varies by region and context. In the United States, stringent policies resulted in reduced methane emissions, emphasizing the importance of consistent implementation. In the European Union, policy effectiveness varied across member states, underscoring the need for knowledge sharing. In India, policies had mixed socioeconomic impacts, calling for targeted support. In the Brazilian Amazon, policies reduced livestock emissions but inadvertently contributed to deforestation, highlighting the importance of integrated approaches. New Zealand's policies encouraged effective dairy farming practices, while Argentina found that rotational grazing supported emission reduction. Australia's sustained policies led to national emissions reductions. These findings emphasize the need for region-specific policy design, long-term monitoring, knowledge dissemination, and policy continuity to address livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions effectively.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Theory of Environmental Policy and Regulation, Theory of Sustainable Agriculture & Theory of Behavioral Change and Adoption may be used to anchor future studies on the livestock emission reduction policies and their impact on greenhouse gas emissions in Peru. There is a need for continued research and monitoring to assess the long-term impacts of these policies and to identify innovative and context-specific emission reduction strategies. Additionally, stakeholders should prioritize knowledge sharing and capacity building to ensure that farmers and communities can effectively adopt sustainable practices encouraged by these policies. Lastly, policy continuity and stability are crucial for achieving sustained reductions in emissions, and governments should commit to their climate targets while adapting policies as needed to achieve optimal results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australian Government. (2019). Long-Term Impacts of Livestock Emission Reduction Policies on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia.

Bandura, A. (2004). Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143-164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660

Berry, W. (2019). The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture. Counterpoint.

DEFF. (2020). National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, South Africa. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.

DEFF. (2020). National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report. Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, South Africa. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.

Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. (2020). UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Final Figures: 2019. UK Government. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.

EPA. (2020). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2019. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.

European Commission. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Livestock Emission Reduction Policies in European Union Member States.

Garcia, M., et al. (2021). Livestock Emission Reduction Policies and Sustainable Grazing in Argentina. Ecological Economics, 182, 106890.

IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Economic Survey 2020. Government of Kenya. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Economic Survey 2020. Government of Kenya. DOI: 10.1002/bbb.

Kumar, R., et al. (2019). Impacts of Livestock Emission Reduction Policies on Rural Livelihoods in India. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 891-901.

Le Qur, C., Jackson, R. B., Jones, M. W., Smith, A. J. P., Abernethy, S., Andrew, R. M., ... & Canadell, J. G. (2020). Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nature Climate Change, 10(7), 647-653. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x

Meadows, G., et al. (2018). Assessment of Livestock Emission Reduction Policies and Their Influence on Dairy Farming Practices in New Zealand. Agricultural Systems, 161, 48-57.

Ministry of the Environment Japan. (2020). Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office of Japan (GIO). Retrieved from https://www-gio.nies.go.jp/en/ghg/

Nigeria INDC. (2020). Nigeria's Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. Retrieved from https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Nigeria%20First/UPDATED%20Nigeria%20INDC%20-%20June%202020.pdf

Nigeria INDC. (2020). Nigeria's Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. Retrieved from https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Nigeria%20First/UPDATED%20Nigeria%20INDC%20-%20June%202020.pdf

Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press.

Raihan, A. (2023). An Econometric Assessment of the Relationship Between Meat Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States. Environmental Processes, 10(2), 32.

Raihan, A., Muhtasim, D. A., Farhana, S., Hasan, M. A. U., Pavel, M. I., Faruk, O., ... & Mahmood, A. (2023). An econometric analysis of Greenhouse gas emissions from different agricultural factors in Bangladesh. Energy Nexus, 9, 100179.

Saadaoui, I., Rasheed, R., Aguilar, A., Cherif, M., Al Jabri, H., Sayadi, S., & Manning, S. R. (2021). Microalgal-based feed: promising alternative feedstocks for livestock and poultry production. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 12(1), 76.

Silva, A. B., et al. (2020). Evaluating the Role of Livestock Emission Reduction Policies in Reducing Methane Emissions in Brazil's Amazon Rainforest Region. Environmental Research Letters, 15(8), 085002.

Smith, J. D., et al. (2017). Assessing the Effectiveness of Livestock Emission Reduction Policies in the United States. Environmental Science & Policy, 72, 1-10.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-15

How to Cite

Joseph, C. M. (2024). Livestock Emission Reduction Policies and their Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Peru. American Journal of Livestock Policy, 4(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajlp.1773