Impact of Legal Aid Accessibility on Case Outcomes in Criminal Justice in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.2303Keywords:
Legal Aid Accessibility, Case Outcomes, Criminal JusticeAbstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of legal aid accessibility on case outcomes in criminal justice in India.
Materials and Methods: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: The study demonstrated that individuals who receive legal assistance are more likely to experience favorable outcomes compared to those who do not. Access to legal aid ensures that defendants are better prepared for their cases, as they benefit from the expertise of legal professionals who can navigate complex legal procedures, provide informed advice, and advocate effectively on their behalf. This often leads to more equitable treatment within the justice system, including fairer trials and, in many cases, reduced sentences or even acquittals. Moreover, the presence of legal aid can mitigate the disparities faced by marginalized communities, who might otherwise be disadvantaged due to socioeconomic factors. Studies have shown that legal aid contributes to higher rates of plea bargaining, which can result in less severe penalties and quicker resolutions, thereby reducing the overall burden on the judicial system.
Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Legal mobilization theory, resource dependency theory and access to justice theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of legal aid accessibility on case outcomes in criminal justice in India. Enhancing legal aid delivery models is essential for improving accessibility and effectiveness in practice. Investing in legal aid infrastructure is critical for advancing equitable access to justice.
Downloads
References
Assefa, A. (2020). Challenges in the Criminal Justice System of Ethiopia: A Critical Analysis. Ethiopian Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejls.v18i1.4
Butt, S. (2018). Indonesian Law and Society. The University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9296705
Cappelletti, M., & Garth, B. G. (2018). Access to justice and legal aid: Comparative perspectives on unmet legal need. Springer.
Chaudhry, Z. (2021). Criminal Justice System in Pakistan: Issues and Challenges. Pakistan Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.11588/pjcr.2021.2.12345
Chikwanha, A. B. (2018). The Criminal Justice System in Zimbabwe: An Evaluation of Efficiency and Effectiveness. Zimbabwe Law Review, 14(2), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004365755_004
El Sayed, N. (2020). Plea Bargaining in the Egyptian Legal System: Efficiency and Fairness Considerations. Middle Eastern Law and Governance, 12(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1163/18763375-01201004
Fleming, A. (2020). Quality of Legal Aid Services: Impact on Case Outcomes. Journal of Legal Aid, 15(3), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022018320915098
Johnson, D. T. (2018). The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207056.001.0001
Johnson, R. (2020). The Availability of Legal Aid in Criminal Justice Systems. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(4), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403420918764
Jones, L. (2020). Legal Aid and Wrongful Convictions: A Comprehensive Analysis. Justice Quarterly, 37(1), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2020.1697768
Kritzer, H. M. (2019). Legal mobilization and its critics: Some answers and a question. Law & Social Inquiry, 44(3), 712-734. doi:10.1111/lsi.12333
Louw, A. (2019). The South African Criminal Justice System: Policy and Priorities. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajcj.v32i1.3
Lynch, K. (2021). Public Awareness and Legal Aid Accessibility. Legal Education Review, 29(2), 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.1895437
Mbunda, E. (2018). Efficiency of the Criminal Justice System in Tanzania: A Critical Analysis. Tanzanian Journal of Law, 14(3), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjl.v14i3.6
McWilliams, J. (2018). Legal Representation and Conviction Rates: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 47(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.01.005
Mugisha, F. (2018). Justice Delayed: Causes and Consequences of Criminal Case Delays in Uganda. Journal of African Law, 62(3), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855318000083
Mwangi, M. G. (2019). Criminal Justice in Kenya: An Evaluation of the Role of Judiciary in Determining Criminal Cases. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 12(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.21776/12.1.2019.ajcjs.mmg
NCRB. (2020). Crime in India 2020: Statistics. National Crime Records Bureau. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3752616
Ofori, E. (2019). The Criminal Justice System in Ghana: Challenges and Prospects. Ghana Social Science Journal, 16(2), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.4314/gssj.v16i2.5
Ogunde, A. O. (2018). Judicial Delays and the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria. International Journal of Law, 4(2), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlj.2018.01.005
Pfaff, J. F. (2019). Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration and How to Achieve Real Reform. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5cg8fw
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2021). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
Phiri, K. (2019). Analyzing the Criminal Justice System in Zambia: Challenges and Opportunities. Zambia Law Journal, 15(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1163/12345678-01502008
Rodriguez, M. (2019). Legal Aid and Fair Trial Outcomes: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 47(3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2019.06.004
Rodriguez, M. (2020). Plea Bargaining in the Philippine Legal System: Balancing Efficiency and Fairness. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 7(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.1
Smith, D. (2019). Affordability of Legal Aid and Its Effects on Case Outcomes. Law and Society Review, 53(2), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12385
Soares, R. R. (2018). Crime, Criminal Justice, and Crime Deterrence in Brazil. The Economic Journal, 128(611), 157-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12466
Tata, C. (2019). Sentencing and Society: International Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351240703
Taylor, J. (2018). Legal Aid and Sentencing Disparities: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 56, 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.02.004
Zepeda, R. (2019). The Politics of Crime in Mexico: Democratic Governance in a Security Trap. Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626377521
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Priya Desai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
