Effect of Corporate Tax Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives in Nigeria

Authors

  • Daniel Ekwueme University of Ibadan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.2001

Keywords:

Corporate, Tax Policies, Corporate Social Responsibility, Initiatives

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of corporate tax policies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives in Nigeria.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: The study indicated that lower corporate taxes may lead to increased CSR spending as companies have more resources to allocate towards social and environmental initiatives, others argue that higher tax rates can incentivize CSR activities by encouraging companies to invest in socially responsible projects as a means to offset tax liabilities. Additionally, certain tax incentives and deductions specifically targeted at CSR expenditures can further encourage companies to engage in socially responsible behavior. However, the impact of tax policies on CSR initiatives can vary depending on factors such as industry, firm size, and the overall economic environment. Overall, understanding the interplay between corporate tax policies and CSR is crucial for policymakers and businesses aiming to promote sustainable and socially responsible practices.

Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Stakeholder theory, agency theory and institutional theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing effect of corporate tax policies on corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives in Nigeria. Corporations should enhance their transparency and disclosure practices regarding CSR expenditures, tax payments, and incentives availed. Policymakers should design tax incentives that explicitly promote responsible corporate behavior, such as tax credits or deductions for CSR expenditures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abishev, T., & Khodzhakulov, K. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in Central Asia: A comparative study of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 86, 82-96. DOI: 10.9774/TandF.4700.2022.february.4.3

Al-Dhaheri, S., & Al-Mazrooei, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in the UAE and Qatar: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 11(3), 189-207. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSOC.2019.10023013

Arunachalam, M., & Kumar, V. (2020). Mapping the drivers and barriers of corporate social responsibility practices in India. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 660-683. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-07-2019-0215

Brown, L., & Spicer, A. (2020). Corporate tax rates and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from qualitative interviews. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(1), 151-167. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04263-z

Bucur, S. I., & Micu, A. R. (2020). The drivers of corporate social responsibility practices in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from Romania and Poland. Sustainability, 12(11), 4617. DOI: 10.3390/su12114617

Chen, Y., & Gupta, S. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence from developing countries. Journal of Corporate Finance, 57, 334-354. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.005

Chen, Y., & Wang, C. (2019). The effects of corporate tax rates on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 59, 10-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.004

Elsayed, M. A., & Paton, R. A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa region. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(4), 764-784. DOI: 10.1108/CG-06-2018-0192

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

García, M., & López, E. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in Mexico and Argentina: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(2), 321-336. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04268-7

Gupta, S., & Sharma, A. (2020). Tax incentives and corporate social responsibility: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 119, 290-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.030

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Johnson, M., & Lee, S. (2021). Corporate tax rates and corporate social responsibility spending: Evidence from multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(3), 537-553. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04263-z

Kofi, A., & Mensah, I. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review of theories, determinants, and challenges. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1186/s40991-017-0026-2

Liu, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). The impact of corporate tax policies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) engagement: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101891. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.101891

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. DOI: 10.1086/226550

Nowak, M., & Kowalska, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in Eastern Europe: A comparative study of Poland and Romania. European Business Review, 33(1), 55-69. DOI: 10.1108/EBR-11-2019-0193

Shu, L., & Cao, Y. (2020). Sustainability-driven innovation in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(7), 2701. DOI: 10.3390/su12072701

Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2017). Trends in corporate social responsibility reporting by the Fortune Global 500: Exploring the influence of country of origin. Journal of International Business Ethics, 10(1), 1-15. DOI: 10.18374/JIBE-17-1.1

Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2019). Tax incentives and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from the United States and United Kingdom. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 428-445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.002

Wijaya, M. A. (2020). Exploring the determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(8), 95-103. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.095

Wu, J., & Chang, C. (2018). Corporate tax policies and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices: A cross-national study. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 627-646. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2941-2

Yang, J., & Wang, Q. (2021). How does corporate social responsibility affect innovation performance? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 13(2), 697. DOI: 10.3390/su13020697

Downloads

Published

2024-05-04

How to Cite

Ekwueme, D. . (2024). Effect of Corporate Tax Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives in Nigeria. American Journal of Law, 6(2), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.2001

Issue

Section

Articles