Development of Rotterdam Rules for Harmonisation of Legal Instruments based on Economic and Political Conditions of UNIDROIT for Renewable Energies of Carbon Emissions

Authors

  • Zharama Llarena

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1320

Keywords:

Hague-Visby Rules, Hamburg Rules, UNIDROIT, Ecotax, Rotterdam Rules

Abstract

Purpose: Commercial transactions have binding obligatory and regulations that are restricted within a particular jurisdiction. However, the bill of lading for international carriage of goods must be performed and exercised resulting to extension of executory principles based on International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT) with a particular focus of interest on renewable energies for corporate economic goals towards sustainable development. This paper aims to develop statutory interpretation, based on Rotterdam Rules, to show the relationship between waste to energy technology and sustainable development. This helps in illustrating environmental tax for carbon emissions of energy management based on life cycle of drugs.

Methodology: Life cycle of drugs involves contractual agreements pertaining to sustainable development and waste to energy technologies. Its carbon emissions must be properly controlled and diverted to renewable energies in order to fulfill the economic success and political safety of sustainable development. The carriage of goods by sea involves legal instruments, such as Hamburg, Hague, and Hague-Visby Rules under principles of International Commercial Contracts (UNIDROIT). Rotterdam Rules covers a broader spectrum and more substantial elements of regulatory functions encompassing Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules.

Findings: Development of carbon tax is a statutory interpretation for economic success of the company towards philanthropic sustainable development in relation to public interests of human rights. Rotterdam Rules developed a means to enforce the substantial elements for validity of Hague, Hague-Visby, and Hamburg Rules in terms of carbon emissions for renewable energies based on sustainable development goals. Hence, the waste to energy technology provided a means of interpreting their economic progress in relation to law of the environment comparable to another jurisdiction.

Recommendation: In order to achieve economic and political stability, there must be a functional equivalence between waste to energy technology and sustainable development, hence, carbon emissions from commercial transactions of International Carriage of Goods must not serve as an impediment to economic success based on laws of the company and the environment, thus, it must fulfill the goals of political sustainable development resulting to renewable energies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Zharama Llarena

LLM Intenational Tax Law Student, Faculty of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University, UK

References

Mathur, S., & Hoskins, C. (2017). Drug development: Lessons from nature (Review). Biomedical Reports, 6, 612-614.

Wernet, G., Conradt, S., Isenring, H., Jimenez-Gonzalez, C., Hungernuhler, K. (2010). Life cycle assessment of fine chemical production: a case study of pharmaceutical synthesis. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 15, 294-303.

Voudrias, E., Goudakou, L., Kermenidou, M., Softa, A. (2012). Composition and production rate of pharmaceutical and chemical waste from Xanthi General Hospital in Greece. Waste Management, 32, 1442-1452.

Sarkar, S., Chakraborty, S., Bhattacharjee, C. (2015). Photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceutical wastes by alginate supported TiO2 nanoparticles in packed bed photoreactor (PBPR). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 121, 263-270.

Isidori, M., Lavorgna, M., Russo, C., Kundi, M., Zegura, B., Novak, M. et al. (2016). Chemical and toxicological characterisation of anticancer drugs in hospital and municipal wastewaters from Slovenia and Spain. Environmental Pollution, 219, 275-287.

Ananth, A.P., Prashanthini, V., Visvanathan, C. (2010). Healthcare waste management in Asia. Waste Management, 30, 154-161.

Nizami, A.S., Rehan, M., Waqas, M., Naqvi, M., Ouda, O.K.M., Shahzad, K. (2017). Waste biorefineries: Enabling circular economies in developing countries. Bioresource Technology, In Press.

Sankaranarayana, S. (2017). Functional Equivalency of Rotterdam Rules. The CINEC Journal, 121-126.

Steiner, N., Azetsu-Scott, K., Hamilton, J., Hedges, K., Hu, X., Janjua, M.Y. et al. (2015). Observed trends and climate projections affecting marine ecosystems in the Canadian Arctic. Environ Red, 23, 191-239.

Jose, A., Francisco, R., & Cruz, N. (1996). A study on impact of climate variability/change on water resources in the Philippines. Chemosphere, 33, 1687-1704.

Green, M., Pri-or, N., Capeluto, G., Epstein, Y., Paz, S. (2013). Climate change and health in Israel: adaptation policies for extreme weather events. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 2, 1-11.

Goklany, I. (2007). Integrated strategies to reduce vulnerability and advance adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change, 12, 755-786.

Bozic, V.S., Cvetkovic, S.M., & Zivkovic, B.D. (2015). Influence of Renewable Energy Sources on Climate Change Mitigation in Serbia. Thermal Science, 19(2), 411-424.

English, P., Sinclair, A., Ross, Z., Anderson, H., Boothe, V., Davis, C. et al. (2009). Environmental Health Indicators of Climate Change for the United States: Findings from the State Environmental Health Indicator Collaborative. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117, 1673-1681.

Reynolds, L. (2012). Climate change and health systems. Continuing Medical Education, 30, 76-79.

Carrico, A., Spoden, M., Wallston, K., Vandenbergh, M. (2013). The environmental cost of misinformation: why the recommendation to use elevated temperatures for handwashing is problematic, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 433-441.

Freedman, M. & Jaggi, B. (2011). Global Warming Disclosures: Impact of Kyoto Protocol Across Countries, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 22, 46-90.

Sanson, M. (2016). Statutory Interpretation, 2nd edition, Oxford University Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-09

How to Cite

Llarena, Z. . (2023). Development of Rotterdam Rules for Harmonisation of Legal Instruments based on Economic and Political Conditions of UNIDROIT for Renewable Energies of Carbon Emissions. American Journal of Law, 4(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.47672/ajl.1320